Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor Rob Barnett Editor in Chief
John Quinn Contributing Editor Ralph Moore Webmaster
David Barker Postmaster
Jonathan Woolf MusicWeb Founder Len Mullenger
Dmitri SHOSTAKOVICH (1906-1975) Festive Overture (1952) [5:50]
Symphony No. 5 (1937) [44:20]
Philharmonia
Orchestra/Vladimir Ashkenazy
rec. Suntory Hall, Tokyo, Japan, July 2001. DDD SIGNUM
SIGCD135 [50:10] /
The Philharmonia
Orchestra’s house label brings us a return to core Russian
repertory and does this courtesy of Vladimir Ashkenazy in
a live concert from Tokyo in 2001. He first recorded Shostakovich’s
Fifth a dozen years earlier for Decca with the Royal Philharmonic,
a version which recently reappeared in the Universal Classics
catalogue at bargain price. The two versions are noticeably
different.
Ashkenazy seems
to have rethought the first movement in the intervening years.
In 1988, his first movement, though a bit scrappy in the
hands of the RPO, was basically an introspective, epic affair,
akin to Western visions of the work such as those led by
Leonard Bernstein, Lorin Maazel, Benjamin Zander or Mark
Wigglesworth. It clocked in around 16:30. The live concert
from 2001, however, times at just under 15:00, putting it
in the more urgent style of Russian conductors, such as Evgeny
Mravinsky, Mariss Jansons, Mstislav Rostropovich, Dmitri
Kitaenko, Rudolf Barshai, Semyon Bychkov and Mark Gorenstein,
if not quite up there with the hectic though compelling Kirill
Kondrashin. This tightening of tempo removes a lot of mystery
and brooding from the music, though it increases the concentration
of the argument, at least for everyone but the cymbal player,
who enters a half-bar early at the big climax. For what it’s
worth, Shostakovich’s son Maxim tends to conduct the first
movement very slowly, but then he can be a bit of a maverick
at times.
The scherzo is
almost identical in tempo in both Ashkenazy performances,
though the playing of the Philharmonia in the live concert
makes a good bonus. The Philharmonia manages the feat of
being both more highly characterized and also more elegant
than the RPO. Ashkenazy, coming to conducting fairly late
from a career as a pre-eminent pianist, is no orchestra builder.
The core of the rich and creamy sound of the Philharmonia
here can be attributed to then-music director Christoph von
Dohnanyi. I heard the same effect many times over the years
when Dohnanyi was in Cleveland. Dohnanyi would drill the
orchestra to a high sheen - then Ashkenazy would guest conduct
and let the orchestra loosen up. He often achieved a sound
that was somehow both elegant and relaxed at the same time,
if rarely as cogent as Dohnanyi could be in concert.
Getting back
to the scherzo, there’s one odd little thing that always
irks me. Is there an error in the Kalmus Miniature Score?
I mean other than the famous misprint in the coda of the
finale, carried over from the first Russian edition. In the
trio of the scherzo, the end of the melody slows down, right
after the glissandos. Almost every performance resumes tempo
on the following held-out note. A close look at the printed
score, however, shows Shostakovich mischievously holding
off the “a tempo” indication until the third beat of that
bar. Though more difficult to keep together in performance,
this delayed resumption of the tempo is a great eccentric
touch. Pity that so few conductors bother. Ashkenazy doesn’t,
either, though he goes to the trouble of putting an inauthentic
(though effective) slur in the horns and trumpets in their
theme.
Ashkenazy’s live
slow movement knocks over a minute off his previous time.
This moves him toward the flowing end of the spectrum, if
not (fortunately!) to the point of Kondrashin or Jansons,
who skate over the surface of the movement without unleashing
its depths. I don’t mind hearing the movement slow as in
Bernstein, Maazel or Maxim Shostakovich, because it can take
it. It’s remarkably resilient music which never seems to
be as long as the clock tells me it is. But if Ashkenazy
is a little too flowing for my taste here, he nonetheless
makes a sound argument for it, encouraging the strings to
play with more warmth than one usually encounters in Shostakovich.
That humanizing effect is captured in even more impressive
sound in the MDG DVD-Audio disc from 2005 by Roman Kofman
and the Beethoven Orchestra. Kofman shies away from the violent
aspects of the work, but warms to its lyrical passages.
The biggest bone
of contention is typically the finale, specifically the ending.
Shostakovich suggested an eighth note metronome value (188
beats per minute), which the publisher assumed couldn’t possibly
be right. Thus, it was “corrected” to quarter note = 188,
a figure which encouraged many earlier Western advocates
of the work (Artur Rodzinski, Leopold Stokowski, Dimitri
Mitropoulos, Jascha Horenstein, Howard Mitchell, Sir John
Barbirolli, Massimo Freccia, Leonard Bernstein and Istvan
Kertesz) to take the coda too fast. Maazel pushed even faster
than that in his 1980 Telarc recording. But the correct figure,
allied with the musical revelation that Shostakovich may
have buried a dissident message in the lyrical center of
the finale, has bolstered the idea of a slower rendition
of the closing, so that it sounds grim instead of triumphant.
Ashkenazy, like
Gergiev and Jansons, seems to follow in the tradition of
Mravinsky, who delivered the coda poker-faced, at a moderately
slow pace. But that’s still a little faster than the metronome
mark, and rather understated, considering that those pounding
timpani are still marked fortissimo, with accents
on every note. Rostropovich, Maxim Shostakovich, Bychkov
and Gorenstein ring a little truer by allowing greater space.
It is possible to go overboard, however, which is why I would
warn listeners to steer away from the live concert version
released by Kurt Masur and the London Philharmonic on the LPO
Live in-house label in 2006. Masur, evidently equating
gross exaggeration with Russian passion, waddles through
the closing pages like a winding-down metronome. The final
few drumbeats are so far apart that the players can’t even
hit at the same time. The rest of that performance is similarly
shoddy and is arguably worth picking up just to amaze your
friends at how wrong-headed a performance can be.
Ashkenazy’s Universal
Classics reissue also contains the Festive Overture,
dispatched with efficiency if not exactly charm by Mikhail
Pletnev and the Russian National Orchestra. Ashkenazy’s own
live version of the overture on Signum is easily superior,
capturing both a sense of occasion and a good-natured playfulness
at a tempo allowing the musicians room to romp. To be honest,
I’ve never liked the noisy showpiece much, at least not until
hearing Ashkenazy put a more human face on it. The Universal
Classics disc contains a couple more trifles, but they aren’t
deal-breakers. The earlier recording allows for a more contemplative
performance, though the sound is rather stitched-together
as Decca’s multi-track recordings tended to be in the 1980s.
The live Philharmonia version has more natural sound, though
it is both live and in the bright and boomy acoustic of Suntory
Hall. That boom, however, plus the boiled-down efficiency
of a tour performance, gives the restrained Ashkenazy a little
more of an aggressive edge than he usually offers in music
such as this.
Available at budget rate in England, the Philharmonia
version thus becomes first choice. Not yet available in the
U.S., and being pre-marketed at full price, the Signum disc
becomes much less attractive when the Universal Classics
version is available at the opposite end of the pay scale.
Reviews
from previous months Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the
discs reviewed. details We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin
Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to
which you refer.