Valery Gergiev, though 
                undeniably charismatic, is not everyone’s 
                cup of tea as a conductor. Speaking 
                to an experienced orchestral musician 
                recently, I was struck by his low opinion 
                of the Russian maestro; "..all 
                those fluttering fingers – what are 
                they for?", he fumed, "heavens, 
                the job’s difficult enough as it is 
                without unnecessary distractions from 
                the very person who is supposed to be 
                there to help!". Sometimes, it 
                does indeed seem that Gergiev has been 
                reading accounts of totemic conductors 
                of the past – Furtwängler in particular 
                – and has adopted some of the externals 
                of their styles. 
              
 
              
That may or may not 
                be fair; the acid test is to be found 
                in the musical results he obtains. These 
                too are variable, though there is no 
                denying the expressive power of his 
                best work. The three Tchaikovsky symphonies 
                recorded here have the potential benefit 
                of having been taken from live performances. 
                For a number of reasons, the Fifth is 
                the least successful; for one thing, 
                no conductor has ever, for me, managed 
                to conceal the comparative weakness 
                of the work itself, its structure comprising 
                conventionality spiked with gimmickry, 
                its conclusion strident yet unconvincing. 
                Then there’s the recording, which is 
                poorly balanced, the brass often obscuring 
                important detail. I’m quite sure it 
                didn’t sound as bad as this live. 
              
 
              
On the credit side, 
                the other two symphonies receive genuinely 
                fine performances. The Fourth, composed 
                at a time of crisis in Tchaikovsky’s 
                life, has a first movement which is 
                a true masterpiece of symphonic composition, 
                and is effectively a symphonic poem 
                in its own right. Gergiev allows it 
                to unfold with dignity, yet injects 
                real drama into the feverish climax 
                at its heart. In taking this approach, 
                he avoids some of the gratuitous tempo 
                fluctuations which many interpreters 
                lazily adopt. 
              
 
              
The slow movement suffers 
                from that acrid Viennese oboe tone, 
                making the great solo at its start rather 
                hard to listen to. In spite of this, 
                however, Gergiev still manages to capture 
                the feeling of fireside nostalgia. The 
                remaining two movements are equally 
                good, though this symphony always suffers 
                from the fact that, after the high anxiety 
                and drama of the first movement, the 
                remaining three inevitably feel anticlimactic. 
                Not much a conductor can do about that, 
                but Gergiev and his players do their 
                best to make the music eventful and 
                highly coloured. 
              
 
              
The recording of the 
                Pathétique is in many 
                ways the most interesting. The concert 
                at which it was made took place on the 
                day the news broke internationally of 
                the Beslan siege. Gergiev was born in 
                that part of the world, and clearly 
                felt especially deeply the horrific 
                fate of those children. Of course one 
                can never say for certain how much such 
                circumstances really affect the nature 
                of a performance. Suffice to say that 
                this does seem to me a particularly 
                deeply felt and high-octane account. 
                There are lapses, such as the impetuous 
                rushes of the first movement’s beautiful 
                second theme, or the poorly defined 
                opening of the 5/4 Allegro con grazia. 
                But the famous march is genuinely 
                thrilling, while the magnificent grief-stricken 
                finale has grandeur as well as sorrow. 
                This is greatly assisted by the glory 
                of the VPO’s string tone, which is as 
                sumptuous and as plangent as ever. 
              
 
              
A bit of a mixed box, 
                then, but containing versions of the 
                fourth and sixth symphonies which are 
                very fine, and which have the virtues 
                of live performance while avoiding some 
                of the acoustic pitfalls this can sometimes 
                bring. 
              
Gwyn Parry-Jones 
                 
              
see also review 
                by Michael 
                Cookson