Volume Ten in the series of live Library of Congress 
          recitals is a very generous set devoted to the Budapest Quartet’s Mozart. 
          It also cannily covers much ground in presenting the full quartet in 
          a 1943 K421 and K464 and then joined by Langenus in the Clarinet Quintet, 
          Szell in the Piano Quartet and to finish Roisman, Kroyt and Schneider 
          slim down for the E Flat Major Divertimento. The discs are especially 
          valuable for the collective light shone on the Quartet’s Mozart performances, 
          which tend to be overshadowed rather by their Beethoven and Haydn, and 
          also in the light of the almost contemporaneous recordings made of the 
          same works. A greater sense of elasticity is almost always present in 
          the concert performances, with congenial surroundings, sympathetic colleagues 
          and a greater sense of expressive breadth adding to the real rewards 
          of this splendid slimline double. 
        
 
        
The Clarinet Quintet brings to the fore the Belgian 
          clarinettist Gustave Langenus, born in Malines in 1893, whose early 
          success in England led to a place in Henry Wood’s Queen’s Hall Orchestra. 
          He was subsequently hired by Walter Damrosch for the New York Symphony, 
          left for the Philharmonic and then began a long career as chamber player, 
          soloist and teacher. A consummate romantic with a beautiful rounded 
          tone he blends with the string players in a performance of marvellous 
          intimacy and projection. They maintain a good tempo in the Allegro, 
          but flow especially convincingly in the Larghetto where Langenus’s occasionally 
          almost flute like upper register lends the movement a distinction all 
          its own. In the Menuetto there is some vital and elegant phrasing and 
          the finale is precise but with sufficient space to breathe – and I admired 
          cellist Mischa Schneider’s bass accents here. Comparison with the famous 
          recording the Budapest Quartet made with Benny Goodman is almost all 
          in favour of this Langenus concert. Goodman always regretted that he 
          and the Budapest had not played the work in concert before recording 
          it – the result is an attractively played but rather metrical performance, 
          with heavy bar lines audible, and a sense of over caution wearyingly 
          pervasive. (It’s less well known that the previous year he had been 
          booked to record it with the Pro Arte Quartet but had apparently turned 
          up at the recording studios after an overnight trip with a soft reed 
          instead of the harder ones used by classical clarinettists, blew a few 
          disappointing notes, packed up and left). Langenus by contrast was a 
          practised exponent of the chamber literature – far more experienced 
          in fact than his younger colleagues – and the resultant performance 
          is one worthy of the music. 
        
 
        
For the E Flat Major Piano Quartet the Quartet are 
          joined by a sometime collaborator, George Szell, whose splendid playing 
          in the Brahms F Minor Quintet at the Library of Congress I recently 
          reviewed and greatly admired (Bridge 9062). Together with Szell they 
          also recorded the two Quartets – as they did later with Mieczyslaw Horszowski. 
          In 1945 at the Coolidge Auditorium they played the E Flat Major over 
          two nights and the performance presented by Bridge is a composite; the 
          first movement comes from the first performance, the second and third 
          from the following day. Harris Goldsmith, as ever an erudite guide, 
          notes the differences in flexibility between this concert and the commercial 
          disc and it’s quite true; analogous, in fact, to the Langenus-Goodman 
          disparity in the greater breadth and flowing flexibility attributable 
          to the live performance. There is also greater metrical freedom and 
          less abrupt and sharpened attacks. 
        
 
        
In the Divertimento Roisman, Kroyt and Schneider conjoin 
          in a reading of considerable élan. Goldsmith points out that 
          their 1940s aesthetic shares a profile – and a speed – with that of 
          the Heifetz-Primrose-Feuermann recording. This is true to an extent 
          though the Budapest players are actually slower in almost all six movements; 
          the expressive freedom thus gained are ones of flexibility and familiarity- 
          they’d played this music longer and deeper than the more celebrated 
          trio. The Budapest reading fits somewhere between that extreme of hyper 
          virtuosity and the more pliant romanticism of the only other then commercially 
          available disc, by the Pasquier Trio, altogether a more reflective affair 
          and attractively so. In the Quartets the players are commandingly fluent. 
          Some scuffs mar the opening movement of K421 – the sound quality varies 
          in places but is never less than acceptable and often a good deal more 
          so - and some may feel they open rather too casually but the Andante 
          is fine. Again maybe the Menuetto falls slight prey to a sense of manipulation 
          but the final movement is elegantly decisive. Not a stellar performance 
          but a good one. K464 is better though I have reservations about the 
          Menuetto again which is rather too manicured for me. The integration 
          and tonal play of the two violins in the opening Allegro is splendid 
          however and the Andante, lasting over eleven minutes, flows seamlessly 
          – a pity about the chuffs and clicks from 2.00 onwards but you can listen 
          through it to the pleasure beyond. 
        
 
        
No complaints about presentation and booklet; few about 
          the recording or playing either. This is a splendidly engrossing set, 
          full of life and engagement, and strongly recommended. 
        
 
        
        
Jonathan Woolf