> Brahms (Clarinet Sonatas) - Schubert (Der Hirt auf dem Felsen) [CH]: Classical CD Reviews- Nov 2002 MusicWeb(UK)

MusicWeb International One of the most grown-up review sites around 2023
Approaching 60,000 reviews
and more.. and still writing ...

Search MusicWeb Here Acte Prealable Polish CDs
 

Presto Music CD retailer
 
Founder: Len Mullenger                                    Editor in Chief:John Quinn             


Johannes BRAHMS (1833-1897)
2 Clarinet Sonatas, op. 120 (1894)
Franz SCHUBERT (1797-1828)

Der Hirt auf dem Felsen (1828)*
Anna-Maija Korsimaa (clarinet), Soile Isokoski (soprano)*, Marita Viitasalo (pianoforte)
Recorded January and April 1993, Järvenpää Hall, Finland
WARNER APEX 0927 48305 2 [59’ 42"]


BUY NOW 

Crotchet   AmazonUK   AmazonUS

Brahms was on the point of retiring from composition when the playing of the clarinettist Richard Mühlfeld inspired him to write these two sonatas, as well as a quintet and a trio including the clarinet, and also to go back generally on his decision to retire.

Mindful of this, many players aim to evoke lovingly the warmly romantic world to which Brahms clung. If this produced distressingly heavy-handed results in the case of Ralph Manno and Alfredo Perl (Arte Nova 74321 27767 2), the great American clarinettist Harold Wright, partnered by Peter Serkin, left performances which combine surging romanticism and nostalgic songfulness (Boston Records BR 1005CD). This was recommended as a Record of the Month about a year ago and remains a touchstone of traditional Brahms playing, in spite of a recording which does not treat the piano so very kindly (a fact which the present very finely engineered issue rather points up).

The booklet gives us helpful notes on the music but not a word on the performers. Korsimaa was a "Young Artist of the Year" in 1988 in her native Finland and can also be heard in a work by Crusell on the BIS label. She and Viitasalo approach the music uncluttered, as it were, by preconceptions. Their tempi are slower than Wright’s in all movements, but in the first sonata at least they produce an entirely valid alternative. By making the most of the dynamic contrasts and showing plenty of rhythmic strength they give us a Brahms who, far from reliving nostalgically his past style, is powerfully confronting the problems of the present. It is a less "lovely" Brahms than Wright’s (though the actual playing is beautiful) but its sinewy purposefulness may be preferred by those who complain that this composer always wrote like an old man.

I am a little less happy with the second sonata which seems, by its nature, a little less suited to a similar operation. This is autumnal music, there is no getting away from it. I also feel there are two miscalculations over tempi. The central section of the second movement is marked "sostenuto", but this surely does not mean that the original "Allegro appassionato" is to be lost sight of wholly, the tempi is broadened in relation to it, but it is not a new tempo altogether. This was one of Manno’s and Perl’s mistakes and Korsimaa and Viitasalo are certainly much less heavy-handed than the Arte Nova team. Indeed, they almost convinced me, but the section does seem a bit too long at this tempo. The other point was right at the end. This sonata closes with a variation movement, mostly in a slow tempo, but for the last three pages Brahms swings into an Allegro. The second of these pages is then marked "Più tranquillo" and here the performance drops right back to a much slower tempo. On the last page Brahms marks no further tempo change, but the music plainly concludes Allegro (and so it is played). This proves, for me, that Brahms’s "Più tranquillo" means a change in atmosphere rather than tempo – he didn’t need to write "A tempo" on the last page because the original tempo has not been departed from. These performers do not agree, and evidently suppose that the "A tempo" was not written by Brahms, either because he thought it was obvious or because he just forgot. However, listen to the effect; does not this Allegro seem absurdly brief, bursting in after so much slow music and then stopping again almost at once? In comparison, Wright and Serkin seem to have it just right.

I’m sorry to have these reservations over the second sonata because the performance still has many fine qualities and that of the first is really worth having alongside the Wright and Serkin one. Another reason for getting this disc is Soile Isokoski’s performance of the Schubert. Isokoski won the first Elly Ameling competition in 1988 and has gradually built up a fine reputation in opera houses on both sides of the Atlantic. Earlier this year she got rave reviews for a disc of Richard Strauss orchestral lieder, including the "Four Last Songs". Her lovely tones negotiate this by no means simple piece with complete ease. The performance has some other points in its favour, too. During the long first section the tempo is held absolutely steady; very often when the piano’s triplets give way to simple quavers a faster tempo is adopted, presumably because the singer’s phrases become very long indeed if the tempo is left unchanged. This evidently creates no problems for Isokoski and the increasing melancholy of the music is hauntingly realised. The final Allegretto is also very well judged.

Christopher Howell


Return to Index

Error processing SSI file