Claudio Abbado’s relationship with the Berlin Philharmonic 
          has not always been an easy one but in the last couple of years a string 
          of remarkable recordings has worked its way onto CD – most recently 
          a stunning Falstaff. Now Deutsche Grammophon are set to release 
          three Mahler recordings recorded live with the Berlin Philharmonic in 
          Berlin and London. The first of those releases, the Third, recorded 
          at the Royal Festival Hall, is everything I remember it being: fabulously 
          rich in detail, profoundly moving and with a sense of perspective it 
          is rare to find in this symphony. It is one of those Mahler performances 
          you never forget, one to be spoken of in the same breath as Chailly 
          conducting Mahler’s First with the London Symphony Orchestra, Maazel 
          conducting the ‘Resurrection’ with the same orchestra, and, going further 
          back, Bernstein’s unforgettable Prom’s performance of Mahler’s Fifth 
          with the Vienna Philharmonic. 
        
 
        
The second of the Mahler releases is this 2001 performance 
          of the Seventh (the final release will be of the Ninth) and is simply 
          fabulous, confirming Abbado as our greatest living Mahlerian. In no 
          other performance does the poetry of this work, or its visions of Romanticism, 
          seem so deftly caught (try, for example about 14 minutes into the opening 
          movement and the astounding articulation of the strings at 15’18 onwards): 
          no other conductor seems to make of this movement what Eliot called 
          ‘time recollected in tranquillity’. The Berlin strings have an ethereal, 
          other-worldly quality, tangible to the touch. And in almost no other 
          performance does the immanent ambiguity of this work seem so resolved 
          by the time we reach the end of that most ambiguous of movements, the 
          Rondo. 
        
 
        
Yet, this is also an intensely imagistic performance. 
          The symbolism of the march themes, of the repeated birdsong, of echoing 
          horns are less bewildering than they seem in less diaphanous performances, 
          rather like looking at a completed picture rather than the sketches 
          for one. Take the oboe duet in the second Trio of the first Nachtmusik, 
          for example; Abbado’s Berliners make this music genuinely, and hauntingly, 
          lyrical, something skated over by Rattle, Bernstein and Sinopoli. Move 
          on to the Scherzo and Abbado and his orchestra take this movement’s 
          shifting syncopations with something resembling a mist induced evening: 
          the nightmares are fleeting, the apparitions ghostly, images are half 
          seen. It is profoundly disturbing, striking in its anguish. Muted violins 
          are more sinister than usual, flute and oboe more piercing than the 
          usual jab in the dark. All of this is in enormous contrast to Abbado’s 
          delicate handling of the second Nachtmusik with its child-like 
          simplicity. The effect is of course magical – the sonority of mellow 
          strings, plucked chords and yearning woodwind as objective and unique 
          as it should be. Come to the disintegration of the coda and the sound 
          is pure confectionary – the bird-like twittering of the flutes in their 
          treble range and the muted violins, played here with perfect pianissimos, 
          are simply stunningly done. 
        
 
        
The sheer scale of what Mahler achieved in the final 
          movement is staggering and this performance of the Rondo Finale 
          is superbly played, quite Rabelaisian in its spirit, with an electrifying 
          tempo swifter than either Bernstein or Sinopoli, neither of whom quite 
          summon up the incandescence of Abbado. The contrasts are thrillingly 
          drawn – day turns to night, hell turns to heaven and desolation turns 
          to triumph. The virtuoso playing adds focus to this paean of celebration 
          over adversity, and adds great contrast to what has preceded it. Abbado’s 
          triumph is to instil some sense of purpose, some sense of reasoning 
          to this movement’s ambiguity – and he does so persuasively. There is 
          a real sense that Abbado treats this Finale as the forward-looking masterpiece 
          that it is.