The hero of the Double Concerto is in some ways Pierre 
          Monteux. As we saw in the recent reissue of his Orfeo ed Euridice 
          (BMG 09026 63534 2; ruined, alas, by Risë Stevens’s old battleaxe 
          of an Orfeo), his natural tendency to clear textures, light basses, 
          not too much legato and springy rhythms, produced results in older music 
          which are still acceptable today. The modern listener will note the 
          lack of a continuo instrument, but since in 1932 that would probably 
          have meant a piano, maybe things are better as they are. 16-year-old 
          Menuhin and his revered teacher fit in with the generally clean-limbed 
          approach (the Largo ma non tanto is less romantic than some performers 
          give us even today). 
        
Unfortunately the same orchestra under Enescu give 
          us Bach as he was wont to be given those days. Fine musician as he was, 
          he is unable to do anything about the heavy basses, the slogging rhythms 
          and the dense textures deriving from too much legato. 
        
Still, the main point here is Menuhin, and here I have 
          to register a certain surprise. Even at this relatively tender age, 
          the ability of Menuhin’s tone, without any perhaps ostensible qualities 
          of brilliance, depth, warmth or whatever, somehow to "ennoble" 
          the classics with its simple yet "spiritual" naturalness, 
          had already been noted by his contemporaries, yet all I hear in these 
          performances is well-schooled playing. It is good that he had already 
          evolved a style which would still be heard as acceptable Bach playing 
          to the end of his career, but there is no doubt that in the ‘50s and 
          ‘60s (before nerves began to compromise his technical delivery) his 
          playing revealed much more fully that spirituality which is at the root 
          of his legend. 
        
As a good modern instruments version of the three concertos, 
          Menuhin’s Bath Festival recordings are still in the running. More than 
          a myth, these first recordings simply provide a pleasant snapshot of 
          his career at that moment. 
        
Good transfers by Ward Marston, informative notes by 
          Tully Potter. Among other things, Potter tells us that Adolf Busch was 
          first approached as Menuhin’s partner for the Double Concerto. He declined, 
          saying that he always put artistic considerations before commercial 
          ones and it was too early for Menuhin to record the work. This is the 
          paradox of recorded music. We can hear that Busch was right; but how 
          nice that we can hear this for ourselves. 
        
 
        
        
Christopher Howell