Other Links
Editorial Board
- UK Editors
- Roger Jones and John Quinn
Editors for The Americas - Bruce Hodges and Jonathan Spencer Jones
European Editors - Bettina Mara and Jens F Laurson
Consulting Editor - Bill Kenny
Assistant Webmaster -Stan Metzger
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN AND HEARD UK CONCERT REVIEW
Haydn, Beethoven:
Navarra
Quartet: Magnus Johnston, Marije Ploemacher (violins), Simone van der Giessen
(viola), Nathaniel Boyd (cello). Reardon Smith Theatre, National Museum,
Cardiff 23.1.2011 (GPu)
Haydn, String Quartet in C, Op.54, No.2
Beethoven, String Quartet in E minor, Op.59, No.2
As has often been noted, Haydn’s opus 54 quartets have about them what was
then a new assertiveness, a new demonstrativeness and even flamboyance of
manner. This is certainly true of the second of the three quartets that carry
the Opus 54 number, the most often played of the three. There is much that is
bold in the writing and some of it makes considerable demands on the players’
virtuosity, in music where the first violin often plays a somewhat dominant
role. In this performance by the young Navarra Quartet – formed in 2002 at the
Royal Northern College of Music and currently Quartet in Association there –
there was plenty of energy and propulsive playing. In the opening vivace the
work of leader Magnus Johnston was strong, and the ensemble playing was well
knit-together, though at moments things felt just a little rushed and in need
of a little more space; certainly some of Haydn’s pauses might have been given
greater value. Johnston was naturally much to the fore in the C minor adagio,
playing the lamenting Ziguener over the hymn-like ground provided by
the other voices. By leading straight from this adagio into the minuet, a
minuet suggestive of both the ländler and the later waltz, Haydn (not
uncharacteristically) teases the listener’s formal expectations, especially
when the adagietto echoes the adagio as well as the minuet proper. This is
tricky stuff and I am not sure that the Navarra absolutely brought it off on
this occasion. Haydn continues to flout mere convention, closing with an
enigmatic movement which opens with a simple and calm adagio (in which the
cello of Nathaniel Boyd was heard to particularly good effect), before a
lively presto enters assertively and appears to have taken over, to have
established the movement as the kind of fast movement properly fitted to close
a quartet; a fortissimo chord feels as though it is announcing the beginning
of a forceful coda, only for the slow opening of the movement to return and
for the work to close with a touching delicacy. The Navarra’s account of this
movement was intelligent and measured, though a little of its magic eluded
them.
In the second of Beethoven’s three Razumovsky quartets the playing was
committed and energetic, though sometimes at the cost of detail. The opening
of the allegro, with its two widely spaced chords, carried appropriate
authority, but in the many rapidly shifting moods that occupy so much of the
movement, transitions and emotional contrasts were not delineated quite as
clearly as they might have been. The lengthy adagio was well focussed and
shaped and the movement’s progression from an initial innocence and unearthly
calm, through a suggestion of the heroic, to a degree of sorrow before closing
in what Cobbett, capturing the emotional ambiguity very well, called “a
tranquillity which is not that of joy” was well articulated. The Navarra
Quartet was at its best in the compelling interpretation of this difficult
movement. The opening of the allegretto was nicely pointed, though in the main
scherzo-body of the movement their playing sometimes seemed too busily
forceful to allow the music’s deep sense of unrest to find expression. The
high-spirits of the closing presto were generally well-handled and a
pleasantly jaunty manner was achieved and sustained, though this performance
didn’t quite have the headlong irresistibility that some quartets have found
in the movement.
The Navarra Quartet is already a good ensemble, and this was a concert at
which one was very happy to have been present. The two quartets they chose to
play on this occasion are both particularly complex and demanding, full of
teasing subtleties and subversions of the conventional; I suspect that in a
few year’s time the Navarra’s readings of these quartets will be better still
– something to look forward to on the evidence of the good things they are
already able to offer.
Glyn Pursglove