Other Links
Editorial Board
- UK Editors
- Roger Jones and John Quinn
Editors for The Americas - Bruce Hodges and Jonathan Spencer Jones
European Editors - Bettina Mara and Jens F Laurson
Consulting Editor - Bill Kenny
Assistant Webmaster -Stan Metzger
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN AND HEARD
UK CONCERT
REVIEW
Beethoven: Arrangement for String Quartet of Piano Sonata Op.14 No.1
Brahms: String Quartet in A minor, Op.51 No.2
Beethoven: String
Quartet in E flat Major, Op. 127
It seems that Beethoven found the process of transcribing his
works for other instrumental arrangements tiresome. He made very few
such arrangements. But he was also worried that his works would be
transcribed by mere imitators and ruined in the process. Obviously
there was then a market for all kinds of arrangements, for domestic
use, etc. The arrangement heard tonight of his Op. 14 No.1 Piano
Sonata for string quartet was made by Beethoven to protect the
quality of both the work transcribed, and the arrangement itself,
and also to deter imitators. It is quite a straightforward affair,
the only substantial change being the transposition of the original
sonata from E major to F, a tonal register more suited to a string
quartet arrangement. The Endellion played this relative rarity in a
suitably straightforward manner, emphasising the tonal and rhythmic
contrasts of the three movements. It was interesting to hear
left-hand piano appeggios given over to string tremolandos and also
the newly syncopated inner parts of the final rondo theme. But this
is ultimately no more than a piece of interesting compositional
diversion so I shall stick to the original piano sonata version.
Much of Brahms' chamber music, and especially the two quartets
Op.51, deserve to be played more often than they are. They are both
superbly rich and diverse works, making one wish Brahms had gone on
to write more string quartets. The Endellion emphasised the more
classical side of the A minor quartet, with fairly brisk tempi for
the opening Allego non troppo, and indeed throughout the whole work.
The development section's rhythmically charged cross-rhythms and
rich viola sonorities were all allowed to speak, as it were, but
always within an integrated classical frame. This brisk directness
certainly paid off in the andante moderato slow movement - not
really a slow movement at all! The canonic recitative between violin
and cello in the mid-section, so admired by Tovey, gained in terms
of clarity, although I did miss something the movement's mood of
sustained opulence within a Bach-like canonic register. The scherzo
third movement, with its 'slow minuet' style, and polyphonic trio in
duple time was refreshingly delivered, although, at times I would
have welcomed slightly more contrast between trio and the minuet
tempo. The finale's lively rondo theme came off splendidly, its mood
of exhilaration, tempered by minor key excursions, convincingly
sustained right up to the terse, but affirmative, coda.
Op. 127, as the first in the series of 'Late Quartets', initiates
the very advanced and wonderful tonal/structural unity - sometimes
unity out of apparent disunity, which was developed through these
late works. From the opening Maestoso unison chords in the tonic E
flat the Endellion projected very resolutely the tonal/harmonic
contour of the whole movement; the point being, of course, that this
bold E flat statement, as in the opening E flat of the earlier 'Eroica'
Symphony, initiates a structural unity; transposed into the mediant
of G major. It appears at the development in C major; the parallel
of E flat's relative minor; it marks the beginning of the
recapitulation, and so on up to the G minor initiated by the cello
which leads to the home tonic of the brief, absolutely punctual, but
quiet, coda. All this was convincingly realised tonight, with some
suitably robust accenting in the jagged and alternating
cross-rhythms of the development section. The great A flat Adagio,
with its set of variations, was securely sustained- not in a rigid
manner, but one which adapted tempo variation to each episode
without losing any sense of coherence. Actually, and contrary to
many standard commentaries, it is more correct to speak not of
variations but of five development sections, in which the theme is
not so much 'worked-out' according to Classical principles but
transformed, while retaining its essential form. The absolute tonal
unity, mentioned above as a feature of the opening movement, applies
with equal mastery here; A flat moving to E flat modulations, and
eventually to a haunting C sharp minor episode, before the coda in
the home tonic. All this was traversed and integrated with the
mastery which comes only from years of total immersion in all of
Beethoven's Quartets, and, with the Endellion, almost all of the
string quartet fragments Beethoven left. My only criticism here was
a need for more Sotto
voce, particularly
in the haunting and sublime C sharp minor fifth variation.
The amazingly agile Scherzando vivace, with its bizarre changes
of tempo, and the rondo finale, depart from the the preceding tone
of reflection and pathos,taking us into a world of high spirits -
what Beethoven described as La
gaieté. The Endellion relished the quirky shifts and rhythmic
turns of the Scherzando, and the brief light-footed trio with its
folk-like dance rounds was given a totally idiomatic peasant dance
inflection. The carnivalesque rondo finale, with its gypsy-like
rhythms, was similarly inflected with joyous zeal. The march-like
second subject with its sharp discordant tonal clashes sounded more
trenchant and even more strident than usual producing a stark
contrast. But the general tone of exuberance and rough humour won
out in the coda with C major trills and a return to the rondo
lyricism of the movement's opening.
Despite a few criticisms regarding an inadequate Sotto
voce, mentioned above, and an occasional lack of finesse in tuning and delineation, this was a
thoroughly engaging and idiomatic performance of an endlessly
protean and fascinating masterpiece.
Geoff Diggines
.