Other Links
Editorial Board
- UK Editors
- Roger Jones and John Quinn
Editors for The Americas - Bruce Hodges and Jonathan Spencer Jones
European Editors - Bettina Mara and Jens F Laurson
Consulting Editor - Bill Kenny
Assistant Webmaster -Stan Metzger
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN AND HEARD UK CONCERT REVIEW
Te Deum, Op. 103
Stabat Mater, Op. 58
After memorable accounts of orchestral music by Suk and Dvořák earlier in
the week, Neeme Järvi turned his attention to two of Dvořák’s choral works.
These pieces, particularly perhaps the Stabat
Mater, deserve more frequent performances. They
are superlatively crafted pieces, full of heart-felt devotion. Järvi’s
accounts were in many respects excellent (particularly the
Te Deum), but the
Stabat Mater lacked that final
element of rapport with the text and spirit.
The Te Deum (1892) is a
mere twenty minutes long and is scored for solo soprano, solo bass, choir
and orchestra. Järvi’s was a superlative account. Only some loss of string
definition at times could be counted against it. Janice Watson’s
contributions were positively radiant. The purity of her “Dignare, Domine”
in the work’s final panel was magic. In many ways, Watson reminds me of
Susan Gritton in her direct musicality. Peter Rose, the bass soloist, was
full-bodied of voice and authoritative. The chorus excelled in the third
movement, the agitated “Aeterna fac cum Sanctis tuis in gloria numerari”.
Järvi led the forces to a rousing conclusion.
Back in 2007,
I reviewed a superlative Arthaus DVD of the
Stabat
Mater,
conducted by Neumann. An earlier work than the
Te Deum
(it was written in 1876/77), it lasts around 85 minutes. In Järvi’s hands,
the important descending lines of the initial “Stabat Mater dolorosa” were
rather literal, and they similarly lacked dramatic resonance on their return
in the ninth movement (“Inflammatus et accensus”). Despite excellent,
well-balanced choral work and some sterling solo contributions, the feeling
was that we never got inside the music. The closest Järvi came was in the
choral pleas, “Eia, mater, fons amoris” (O mother, fount of love, make me
feel the strength of thy grief”), where he seemed to find the perfect tempo.
The final movement sought to redress the balance with a wonderful “Paradisi
gloria” and a miraculous unaccompanied choral moment near the end. It was
not enough to erase memories of the performance’s structural shortcomings,
however (this final movement should have felt like the natural summation of
emotions previously invoked and their resolution in Paradise).
Janice Watson’s strengths remained unabated in
the second part of the concert. Dagmar Pecková replaced an indisposed Sara
Fulgoni. Pecková is a remarkable musician. Her contribution to the second
movement (“Quis est homo”) was creamy and lovely, yet impassioned; she also
provided an ardent plea in the penultimate “Inflammatus et accensus”.
Unfortunately in this latter instance, she was occasionally drowned by the
orchestra, something that seemed to be Järvi’s miscalculation. The tenor
(Peter Auty) was superbly focussed and his lines were well-projected. Peter
Rose, the bass soloist, was remarkably commanding in his “Fac et ardeat cor
meum” (the fourth movement).
The London Philharmonic Choir remains a superb group, working impressively
as a single body at either end of the dynamic spectrum. The soloists,
despite a last-minute substitution, remained impressive. Yet the niggling
realisation that, in the Stabat Mater
at least, Dvořák’s genius had not been done justice, remained.
Given that Dvořák’s Requiem conducted by Järvi has appeared on the
LPO’s own label (LPO-0042), it is not unreasonable to expect that these
performances might, also, be issued in due course.
Colin Clarke