Other Links
Editorial Board
-
Editor - Bill Kenny
Assistant Webmaster - Stan Metzger - Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN AND HEARD INTERNATIONAL CONCERT REVIEW
Brahms and Shostakovitch: Frank Peter Zimmerman (violin), Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra, Bernard Haitink (conductor), Het Concertgebouw, Amsterdam 21.3.2010 (BK)
Brahms: Violin Concerto in D Major, Op. 77
Shostakovitch:Symphony No. 15 in A Minor, Op. 141
As the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra's Director General Jan Raes pointed out
last year in his
interview with Bas van Westerop for Seen and Heard International, the
orchestra's distinctive sound is closely associated with the Concertgebouw
building itself. 'If
Rotterdam is energetic,' he said, 'then Amsterdam is more velvet,
more rounded.' He then added that 'Rotterdam is sometimes an
orchestra of soloists and Amsterdam an orchestra of people working together to
find a homogenous sound.' Well, he would know; he was also General
Director in Rotterdam for four years before moving to his current post.
It was a particular privilege then to hear 'the best orchestra in the world' in
its own hall for the very first time after more than 50 years of concert -
going. This Sunday afternoon concert coincided with a planned trip to see Kaija Saariaho's opera Emilie at Het Muziktheater, Netherlands
Opera's home in Amsterdam and the opportunity to hear it was simply too
good to miss: especially since the concert was directed by Bernard Haitink, the orchestra's Principal /Chief Conductor from 1961 to 1988.
According to the Concertgebouw's
web site Bernard Haitink himself had said at some time that the Concertgebouw building was the best
instrument in the orchestra that it houses. There's no argument at all on this point;
the hall's acoustic is clearly associated with the velvety orchestral
quality that
Jan Raes described.
Frank Peter Zimmerman played the familiar Brahms violin concerto with such commitment
and effortless ease that he made the work seem newly appealing. He produced
such a wonderful array of colour and expressiveness for each movement that the
work's many moods - especially the first in which the cadenza was subtle and
almost menacingly dark at times - had a quality of freshness and spontaneity
that was a delight to hear. Mr.
Zimmerman was rewarded with a prolonged standing ovation
from almost everyone present in the sold-out concert hall.
Shostakovitch's quirky final symphony is a famous enigma of course. The composer is reported as having described the first movement
Adagietto as 'a toyshop with plenty of trinkets and knick-knacks
- absolutely cheerful' and the many repetitions of the quote from Rossini's
'William Tell' overture certainly seems to support this description, at least at first
sight. But Shostakovitch is always more subtle than he often admits
and behind his apparent naïveties (cf his Ninth Symphony), something darker
is almost always present in his writing, often as not related to his turbulent
clashes with the Soviet authorities. Hence this particular quotation, I suspect,
borrowed from an opera about a Swiss freedom fighter and also famously used by the US television series, 'The Lone Ranger' which has a
similarly virtuous hero. The intent isn't only joie de vivre.
The dark second movement, with its quotation of the 'fate' motif from
Wagner's Ring, its grave chorale for brass, its trombone glissandi and lamenting cello
solo, is anything but
joyful - full of menace in fact - and the third movement provides only a brief
respite before the even more enigmatic finale. There we find extra
references to Wagner's 'fate' theme as well as his Tristan und Isolde, to
twelve-tone rows and to Strauss's Heldenleben among other sources.
Typical Shostakovitch orchestral grandeur mixes with the often mentioned ticking clocks until
the symphony finally dies away by returning
full circle to the spare celesta notes with which it began. If there is hope
left to us in the end, this symphony seems to say, then that hope is extremely
faint.
Under Bernard Haitink's direction, the orchestral sound was everything that Jan
Raes had promised - velvety, homogenous and perfectly crafted at every turn. If
there's a quibble, then it's a only a very small one; occasionally, especially in the Brahms
concerto, the sound was almost too tidy and polite. Which factor was responsible
for this, the hall's intrinsic acoustic, the orchestra's extraordinary precision or
Bernard Haitink's conducting is impossible to say after a single hearing.
Bill Kenny