Other Links
Editorial Board
-
Editor - Bill Kenny
-
Deputy Editor - Bob Briggs
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN AND HEARD
UK CONCERT REVIEW
Schumann, Brahms:
Kate Royal (soprano);
Christopher Glynn (piano). Wigmore Hall, London 7.5.2009 (CC)
Schumann
6 Lieder, op. 107.
Brahms
Liebestreu; In der Fremde; Lied; Parole; Anklänge; Juchhe!
Schumann
Gedichte der Königin Maria Stuart, Op. 135.
Brahms
Murrays Ermordung. Nachtigallen schwingen. Wie die Wolke nach der Sonne. Der
Frühling. Volkslied. Der Trauernde. Liebe und Frühling I & II.
It is
fascinating, tracking the career of Kate Royal. Her EMI discs have been popular;
they are imaginatively programmed and provide a fascinating mix of the familiar
and the less well-known. Her operatic career is taking off in no uncertain
fashion: future engagements include Donna Elvira (Glyndebourne), Pamina and Anne
Trulove (Rake’s Progress) at the Royal Operas, Covent Garden and her
debut at the New York Met.
The world of Lieder is where Kate Royal feels most at home, though, and on this
occasion she did indeed project a real sense of communication to this
near-capacity Wigmore audience. In terms of vocal range, she is a true soprano,
but as she conclusively proved on several occasions, that does not mean that her
lower register is weak. Far from it, and this ability to truly project low down
was used to great effect, in the Brahms song, “Liebestreu”, Op. 3/1, for
example.
The programming was carefully considered and often beautiful. There was one
last-minute hitch, however. Graham Johnson, the originally advertised
accompanist, had cancelled and so the young Christopher Glynn substituted at a
late stage. Royal has, of course, recorded a highly successful Schumann disc for
Hyperion with Graham Johnson (CDJ33110) although none of the repertoire on that
disc was replicated in the present recital. Glynn is an able pianist who took
some time to accustom himself to the Wigmore acoustic, threatening to overpower
Royal on several occasions in the earlier stages of the evening. It was only
when we arrived at the fourth of the Brahms songs in the first half, “Parole”,
Op. 7/2, wherein Brahms conjures up the huntsman by using horn-derived fanfare
figures, that Glynn really began to indicate that he has any great force of
character.
If her
2008 Wigmore recital indicated that Royal’s diction was improving beyond all
measure, this concert confirmed it. She launched the evening with Schumann’s Six
Lieder, Op. 107 (1851), a group of settings of Titus Ulrich, Möricke, Heyse and
Müller von Königswinter, all of which centre on the concepts of loss and
sadness. Royal’s blanched tone for the first, “Herzeleid”, seemed entirely
appropriate. The words “unglücksel’ge Träumerin” (luckless dreamer) seem
designed to slip up any unwary singer, but they were in fact crystal clear even
at the very back of the hall. If one can make references to Wolf’s more famous
“Gärtner” (Schumann’s third song) and a sideways nod to Schubert’s (or
Gretchen’s) spinning-wheel for “Der Spinnerin” in the mode of accompaniment,
neither action interrupts the integrity of Schumann’s utterance. Most
impressive, perhaps, was the sense of continuity between stanzas the musicians
effected in the final song, “Abendlied” (“Evening Song”).
The set of Brahms songs from the first half were remarkably wide-ranging, from
the mini-operatic scene of “Liebestreu” (“True love”) through the exciting
“Parole” (which actually was the first time in the recital that Royal really
showed us the power of her voice) to the joyous, playful “Juchhe!” (“Hurrah!”).
The magnificence of the programming shone through the first sequence of the
second half. The five songs of Schumann’s late, beautiful Gedichte der
Königin Maria Stuart, Op. 135 cradled Brahms’ setting of a Scottish
folksong, “Murrays Ermödung”, Op. 14/3 (1858), inserted between the second and
third Schumann songs. The contrast between the outgoing Brahms and the preceding
Schumann, “Nach dem Geburt ihres Sohnes” (“After the birth of her son”) was
stark indeed.
Royal did not quite capture the sense of tender farewell that runs through Op.
135/1, “Abschied von Frankreich”, a shame as the song flowed well. More
effective was the prayer-like “Nach der Geburt ihres Sohnes” (“After the birth
of her son”), a song of the starkest, most ascetic prayer imaginable. The trick
here is to ensure that it does emerge as a prayer, not as a contradictory
funeral dirge, and Royal succeeded magnificently. The third song, “An die
Königin Elisabeth” emerged as a perfect partner to the Brahms folksong
insertion. The most problematic of Schumann’s Op. 135 is No. 4, “Abschied von
der Welt” (“Farewell to the World”), purely in terms of projecting the words
which pose problems for any non-native German speaker (“Zugemess’ne Zeit” seems
doomed). Yet Royal succeeded, even revelling in the magnificent processes of the
German language itself (which other language has a single word for “joy of
death”? – “Todesfreudigkeit”). Actually, this fourth song is surely one of
Schumann’s jewels from any period of his life. The way the composer seems
to play with our very perceptions of time itself is simply awe-inspiring. One
criticism, and it is directed at the pianist – the attempts at painful, accented
gestures on the piano failed. One could hear what Glynn was getting at and
aiming for – and indeed, what Johnson would surely have achieved, had he chosen
to do so – but the effect was beyond Glynn’s expressive capabilities.
Finally, a set of seven Brahms songs, taken from opus numbers from which Royal
had extracted songs in the first half: Opp. 6, 7 and 3 (in that order). Royal’s
decision to keep her arms absolutely motionless at her sides for some of the
songs was a little off-putting as it was so artificial. Op. 6/2 was a case in
point (“Der Frühling”). Close your eyes, though, and Royal projected the idea of
contained elation very effectively indeed. Impressive also was Royal’s handling
of “Liebe und Früihling I”, Op. 3/2, a song that begins as a folksong before
blossoming out into more overtly expressive realms.
If there is one major criticism of this recital, it is of length. The first half
was a mere 30 minutes (exactly); the advertised programme finished at 8.56pm,
and there was only the one encore (the traditional song, “Early one morning”).
Kate Royal seems to be going from strength to strength, learning from her
mistakes and taking constructive criticism on board.
As a postscript, I was about to point out a performance of Handel’s 1749
oratorio Susanna that was scheduled for October this year at the Barbican
with Royal in the title role, only to find that she has been replaced by Sophie
Klarthauser on the grounds of pregnancy and that Royal’s baby is due around
then. Congratulations are in order, it seems.
Colin Clarke
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page