Other Links
Editorial Board
- 
            Editor - Bill Kenny 
- 
            Deputy Editor - Bob Briggs 
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
 SEEN AND HEARD  
UK CONCERT REVIEW
 
            
            Haydn and Gesualdo: 
            Hilliard Ensemble, Chilingirian Quartet, Wigmore Hall, 
            
            London, 
            8.4.2009 (GDn)
            
            
            
            Haydn: 
            The Seven Last Words from the Cross, op.51 (publ. 1787)
            
            
            Gesualdo: 
            Responsoria in Parasceve (publ. 1611)
            
            
            
            
            Music for Holy Week, but with a twist; you'd expect nothing less 
            from Carlo Gesualdo. His Good Friday Responsories are rarities in 
            live performance, a fact easily explained by the immense 
            difficulties they pose for the singers. They are heavy going for the 
            audience too, so interspersing them with Haydn’s more civilised, and 
            considerably less traumatic, Seven Last Words strikes an appealing 
            balance between substance and digestibility.
            
            The Hilliard Ensemble are brave souls. They perform Gesualdo’s 
            wayward harmonies and erratic voice-leading permutations with 
            commitment and panache. The group has come close to monopolising 
            this repertoire, their ECM release of Gesualdo’s music for holy week 
            is the only complete recording currently available, and the 
            programme performed this evening will also be given in Valencia, 
            Berlin, Oxford and Nicosia over the Easter period. But competent as 
            they are, they certainly don’t make it sound easy. Responsory 1 
            Omnes amici mei dreliquernut me is a plunge straight into the 
            deep end, with terse six-voice polyphony, no discernable imitation 
            between the parts and few even transitory stable pitch centres. The 
            acoustic of the Wigmore Hall is not ideal for this sound; it favours 
            the countertenor and bass voices, but renders the middle voices 
            indistinct. The precision of their ensemble suggests that the 
            singers hear each other well enough, but each faces daunting 
            challenges in reconciling their own line with its harmonic and 
            contrapuntal context. Sustained notes, more often than not in the 
            uppermost countertenor part, are held over radically shifting 
            harmonies, and there is a tendency for the pitch to waiver simply 
            through the instability caused by these accelerated tectonics. 
            Another of Gesualdo’s nasty tricks is to write descending leaps of a 
            4th or 5th in the vocal lines while 
            simultaneously moving to a distant harmony. The singers often 
            struggle to find their destination pitch, but who can blame them? 
            The whole Gesualdo performance was a stimulating, if unnerving, 
            experience, sensations intensified by the inevitable feelings of 
            empathy for the singers.
            
            The Haydn seemed a heaven of tranquillity by comparison. 
            Interspersing the two works polarises the stylistic contrast, a 
            perception emphasised by the classical formality of the 
            Chilingirians’ interpretation. Any urges to romanticise Haydn’s 
            expressive phrasing are steadfastly resisted, highlighting the 
            music’s devotional roots at the expense of its humanity. The quartet 
            perform with a strident, often forceful tone, as if trying to fill a 
            much larger space with their sound. In another programme the results 
            might seem intimidating, but as interludes from the excesses of 
            Gesualdo they come over as enforced neutrality, dragging the ear 
            back to familiar tonal territory. Sadly, the quartet’s performance 
            was dogged by intonation and ensemble problems. The simple octave or 
            unison textures that open each movement were often badly out of 
            tune, and while pitch issues were usually resolved within a few 
            bars, the following textures often lacked co-ordination and often 
            failed to reach a consensus as to when chords should end. The 
            strident interpretation style only served to highlight these 
            inaccuracies.
            
            But technical flaws aside, it was the lack of expression that 
            frustrated most. While some other quartets could be accused of 
            performing the music of the late 18th century as if it 
            were from the mid 19th, the Chilingirian have veered to 
            the opposite extreme. It’s just too classical, and too restrained, 
            even for music written for Good Friday observances in the late 18th 
            century. I couldn’t help the feeling that, had Haydn been here, he 
            too would be yearning for more dynamic variation and some rubato to 
            shape the phrases. Although what he would have made of the Gesualdo 
            is anybody’s guess.
            
            
            
            Gavin Dixon
            
            
            
            
	
	
            
	
	
            
	
	
              
              
              Back 
              to Top                                                 
                
              Cumulative Index Page 
                           
                                                                                                    
                                    
                          
