Other Links
Editorial Board
-
Editor - Bill Kenny
-
Deputy Editor - Bob Briggs
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN AND HEARD
UK RECITAL REVIEW
Mozart,
Schoenberg, Schubert, Chopin:
Jonathan
Biss (piano). Wigmore Hall, 2.4.2009 (CC)
Two
days before Biss walked on stage at the Wigmore, Kirill Gerstein
gave a (mixed) recital at the Queen Elizabeth Hall, so it was
interesting to be able to compare two young men whose careers are on
the up at the moment. Biss, of course, boasts an EMI contract and
his recordings have so far been very well received by the press.
Biss took a little time to
acclimatise himself to the piano though, surely something that
should have been achieved before the concert?. The tell-tale sign
was a couple of notes that failed to sound in the exposition of the
Mozart C minor Sonata, K457 and which returned to consciousness on
the repeat. Overall, Biss’ reading of the first movement was a fiery
and convincing one. A pity, then, that the central Adagio sounded
forced at first. As it progressed, the music seemed to come into
focus. This was good but certainly not outstanding Mozart.
On the Tuesday, Gerstein had given Schoenberg’s Op. 11
Klavierstücke and underwhelmed. Biss opted for the Sechs
kleine Klavierstücke, Op.19, and triumphed. He was very alive to
the elusive nature of this music, especially in the staccati dyads
of the second piece, and its thrillingly stabbed sforzandi. Given
Schoenberg’s stated allegiance to his Viennese predecessors, the
move back to Schubert should be seamless. Biss chose a ‘torso’
sonata, the bimovemented C major, D840, the so-called “Reliquie’.
Biss’ reading was intelligent and finely nuanced, but missed the
depth the finest Schubert interpreters regularly find here. In
compensation, Schubert’s obsessive way with his motifs came through
– even against the uncomfortable counterpoint of a mobile alarm, at
one point. The second movement, a cortege-like Andante, came off
better.
There was an all-Chopin second part to the concert. Biss avoided
over-pedalling in the Op. 60 Barcarolle, taking things to the
opposite extreme. Expert filigree did not make up for the lack of
atmosphere; better were the three Mazurkas of Op. 59. The famous Op.
59/3, in particular, seemed to include a wide emotional range in its
short duration. A Nocturne (D flat, Op. 27/2) was well shaped,
enabling the climax to make its mark. The final item, the fourth
Ballade (F minor, Op. 52) was fluid but not structurally coherent,
as well as containing some uncharacteristically approximate, fudged
passages.
The encore was the slow movement of Mozart’s K545 sonata, here a
beautiful gem that made one wish he could have played all of K457 to
this standard.
Colin Clarke
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page