Other Links
Editorial Board
-
Editor - Bill Kenny
-
Deputy Editor - Bob Briggs
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN AND HEARD INTERNATIONAL CONCERT REVIEW
Mozart and Webern:
Fazιl Say (piano) and Ensemble Resonanz. Laeiszhalle Hamburg,
25.2.2009 (TKT)
Webern:
Movement for String Orchestra in D minor (op. post.)
Mozart:
Piano Concerto in C Major, K467
Webern:
Five Movements, op.5 (version for string orchestra)
Mozart:
Piano Concerto in D major, Coronation, K537
Mozart and Webern in one concert? If you follow the organizers,
listening to each composer helps to hear the other one in a new way.
There is a certain historical logic to this: what started with the
First Viennese School, (G C Wagenseil et al), the Mannheim School (J
and C Stamitz et al) and a little help from J S Bach’s sons,
eventually led to Viennese Classicism by ringing in the Age of
Sentiment, introducing the “gallant style” and developing the
structure of the sonata movement, which was also adopted for
symphonies and solo concertos. Anton Webern, on the other hand, was
a member of the
Second Viennese School around Arnold Schoenberg, which developed
12-tone music, a way of composing which regards all twelve notes of
the chromatic scale as equal, denying the conventional hierarchy of
notes. This effectively denies our desire to have dissonances be
resolved in consonances (which consist of the hierarchically
superior notes). Small wonder that audiences have had enormous
difficulty with 12-tone music, which has never become part of
popular culture.
It is true that we hear, say, Debussy differently after a Brahms
symphony than after a work by Schoenberg: we are more likely to hear
the dissonant sounds Debussy created to paint his musical pictures.
Yet, today our perception of what is and what is not dissonant has
changed so thoroughly, simply leaving out some of the notes of a
chord – a device Mozart used in his C major concerto – no longer
suffices for us to hear a dissonance. No amount of Webern can
re-train our ear that drastically.
Still, the combination of Mozart and Webern worked, for the simple
reason that Webern’s pieces are quite beautiful – and how many
people would you draw into a concert hall by announcing Webern
alone? The Movement in D minor is a neoromantic fragment, which was
recorded for the first time a few years ago, by Festival Strings
Lucerne, and is utterly evocative and deserves to be discovered. The
Five Movements are full of contrasts, drama, and a wide range of
emotions and timbres, which the Ensemble Resonanz rendered with
great clarity.
Fazιl Say is a third-generation disciple of the
Second Viennese School, as it were: his father, a respected
musicologist in Turkey, studied with Theodor W. Adorno who, like
Webern, in turn had studied with Schoenberg. Say’s Mozart is
certainly not the ethereal, childlike composer we often hear, but
rooted in this earth: bubbly, extraverted, full of joie de vivre,
and masculine. Say, who is not only an accomplished composer but
also an extremely gifted improviser, played his own cadenzas with
great chutzpah and such irreverence, he sometimes stayed just this
side of musical caricatures. He mastered the quiet, tender sounds
but largely stunned listeners with his extreme dexterity, especially
in the D major concerto, an unspectacular work but a bottomless
source of Mozart melodies. Would the composer have approved? Says’s
performance may not be what he had in mind, but no doubt Mozart
would have enjoyed this fresh interpretation – and after all, Say
was a great deal more Mozart than Mozart was Turkish in his Rondo
alla turca.
The audience was noticeably uplifted. It was treated to three
sweeping encores: Mozart’s Ah, vous dirai-je, Maman at
breakneck speed, Alla Turca Jazz (the title says it all), and
Say’s own Black Earth, a dark and haunting composition based
on a Turkish ballad about loss and loneliness.
Thomas K Thornton
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page