Other Links
Editorial Board
-
Editor - Bill Kenny
-
Deputy Editor - Bob Briggs
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN AND HEARD INTERNATIONAL
CONCERT REVIEW
Ravel,
Theofanidis and Brahms:
Seattle Chamber Music Society,
Lakeside School, North Seattle, 13.7.2009 (BJ)
The
centerpiece in the program was the world premiere of a commissioned
work by Christopher Theofanidis, and the customary pre-concert recital
was sensibly devoted to an introduction to his Summer Verses.
The two brilliant performers, violinist James Ehnes and cellist Robert
deMaine, played snippets from the piece, and the 41-year-old Texas-born
composer presided with a good deal of easy-going charm.
Playing
for about 15 minutes, Summer Verses is clearly
designed to offer a relatively undemanding listening experience, but
that doesn’t preclude the exercise of considerable craft and some
satisfyingly intense expressive touches in at least four of the five
movements. The fourth movement, however, is a horse of another color.
Titled “Robert,” it celebrates the composer’s and cellist’s 20-year
friendship with a trenchant–not to say somewhat scurrilous–musical
portrait.
Essentially
a piece of music theater, rather like those the trombonist Stuart
Dempster was pioneering as far back as the 1960s, it calls on the
resourceful cellist to contribute all kinds of physical effects and
vocal interjections. The ebullient deMaine obliged with evident relish,
while Ehnes chugged away at his side with simple poker-faced repeated
notes.
A
good time was had by all. I have to say that it’s hard to imagine
another cellist fitting comfortably into deMaine’s shoes, which may
limit the viability of the piece for other duos–but after all,
Lutoslawski’s exploitation of Rostropovich-ian musical foibles in his
Cello Concerto hasn’t restricted that work’s wider dissemination. My
only disappointment in the rest of Summer Verses
came in the slow third movement, headed “lyric, wistful.”
Theofanidis
had told us that the violin’s theme here would continue unchanged while
shifting harmony beneath it altered its effect. But the change seemed
to me scarcely perceptible in impact, perhaps because there was too
much texture in the theme itself: Frank Martin did something similar,
but to much more arresting effect, in the opening pages of his 1945
masterpiece, the Petite Symphonie concertante.
Still, there were plenty of other more telling touches in Theofanidis’s
new piece, and it would take more curmudgeonry than even I can muster
not to respond to it with as much enjoyment as the evident enjoyment of
a packed house demonstrated.
First
on the program was Ravel’s Sonata for Violin and Piano. As is usual in
Seattle Chamber Music Society concerts, the different works on the
program offered the opportunity to hear a variety of performers on the
same instruments, and the Ravel was entrusted to violinist Soovin Kim
and pianist Adam Neiman, who realized the full quicksilver character of
the work with a performance that combined technical assurance and
beguiling tone with a truly Ravelian indirectness and subtlety.
I
had expected Brahms’s monumental Piano Quintet, after intermission, to
be the crown of the evening. In the event, it did not quite attain that
stature. There is much to be said for a dynamic rather than portentous
treatment of the work’s first movement. In all four movements,
moreover, there were some superbly expressive contributions from second
violinist Augustin Hadelich, violist Richard O’Neill, and particularly
cellist Edward Arron. The last-named, a cellist I have not heard before
but certain look forward to encountering again, possesses a mighty
reservoir of dark, resonant tone in the lower reaches of the
instrument’s range.
Anna
Polonsky is a pianist whose gifts as a chamber-music player I have had
several occasions to admire in the past. So I am inclined to give her
relatively faceless participation in this performance the benefit of
the doubt. She may well have been collegially trying not to throw the
playing of the first violinist too much in the shade. Scott St. John,
it seemed to me, sacrificed everything to a shallow kind of excitement.
He hacked at the quicker music rather than giving the notes time to
speak, and his tone, lacking elsewhere in substance, was hardly
beautiful even when, as in the potentially ravishing slow movement, it
did take on some body.
As
a result, this wonderful work emerged not sounding much like Brahms,
and the end epitomized the rather superficial nature of the whole
performance. In the breathtaking coda, insufficient care was taken with
the phrasing of the helter-skelter triplet rhythms, so that the very
last note came across as if it were on a heavy beat rather than as the
astonishing throw-away last member in one such triplet. Nevertheless,
the magnificent Ravel and the quirkily inventive Theofanidis were
enough to make the evening on balance a real pleasure.
Bernard
Jacobson
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page