Other Links
Editorial Board
-
Editor - Bill Kenny
-
Deputy Editor - Bob Briggs
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD INTERNATIONAL CONCERT REVIEW
Bach, Szymanowski, Strauss, and
Mussorgsky:
Emanuel Ax (piano), Philip Smith (trumpet), Sheryl
Staples (violin),
Robert Langevin (flute),
Liang Wang (oboe),
New York Philharmonic Orchestra, Lorin Maazel
(conductor). Avery Fisher Hall, New York, 3.1.2009
(MB)
Bach - Brandenburg Concerto no.2 in F
major, BWV 1047
Szymanowski – Symphony no.4, for piano and orchestra, op.60
Strauss – Burleske in D minor, for piano and orchestra
Mussorgsky,
orch. Ravel – Pictures at an exhibition
This was a curious programme. Part way through Pictures at an
exhibition, I wondered whether a connecting theme might have
been unusual concerto forms – at least in Classical terms – although
I doubt that this could have been the intention. I had better
explain why Mussorgsky-Ravel would fall into such a category, so
shall start with that, the final work, which had the second half to
itself. Pictures at an exhibition is not, of course, a
concerto for orchestra but in Lorin Maazel’s performance, it rather
sounded like one. Ravel’s transcription has become very much an
orchestral showpiece and seeking for a Mussorgskian heart beating
beneath the Ravelian glitter may be somewhat to miss the point, but
I do think it worth making the attempt. This performance was verily
sped through, all sections of the New York Philharmonic on superb
technical form, yet I could not help thinking that something was
missing. The tone was set with an opening Promenade as brisk as –
probably brisker than – any I have ever heard, and almost every
movement was considerably quicker than usual. The cart in ‘Bydlo’ is
drawn by oxen; here it sounded motorised, almost turbo-charged. By
contrast, the ‘Great Gate of Kiev’ seemed to last for an eternity,
excessively drawn out even without the irritating inserted pregnant
pauses. Much of the audience clearly enjoyed such a virtuosic
account – I hesitate to say ‘interpretation’ – but I found this the
least interesting of the four performances.
Let us return to the beginning. Bach’s second Brandenburg
Concerto is one of the greatest of all concerti grossi
and I liked this performance very much. It may not have plumbed the
Bachian depths; Maazel is no Klemperer or Richter. But we benefited
from elegant style and a praiseworthy refusal to genuflect before
the false god of ‘authenticity’. Each of the soloists proved
eminently musical and exhibited great beauty of tone. Balances both
between concertino and ripieno and between the
soloists themselves – often tricky in this work – were perfect.
Dynamic contrasts were sometimes terraced, though never aggressively
of the ‘sewing-machine’ Baroque school, and sometimes shaded,
especially in the beautiful slow movement. It flowed in the best
sense, ‘flowing’ here being what it says rather than a euphemism for
dogmatically fast. The contrast with the opening of the third
movement, characterised by a perky trumpet entry, was musical rather
than a perverse shock-tactic. Maazel here adopted a tempo that
seemed just right: lively but not frenetic, and with a nice but not
vulgar rallentando at the close.
Szymanowski’s Fourth Symphony is not a concerto, but has a
concertante piano part, here played by Emanuel Ax. The music and the
style are of course Szymanowski’s own, but for the uninitiated, one
hears something between Bartók and Zemlinsky. It is a marvellous
work and it was gratifying to hear it performed by musicians who are
not especially known as advocates of the composer. Maazel drove some
of the music, especially in the outer movements, a little hard but
the great washes of orchestral sound came over well, with excellent
solo work from the leader and timpanist, amongst others. Ax could be
rather heavy-handed, playing his part as if this really were a
Romantic concerto. However, he was most impressive as the hot-house
accompanist of the slow movement’s night-chamber-music.
King Roger, the composer’s
operatic masterpiece, was palpably close.
Maazel and Ax both seemed better acquainted with Strauss’s
Burleske, Ax now playing without a score. It is an endearing if
un-Straussian work, generally more redolent of Brahms, sometimes
Schumann, and occasionally Liszt; there is perhaps but one
progression that puts me in mind of the later Strauss (Rosenkavalier,
certainly not Elektra). Not even as good a performance as
this was could convince me that Strauss always knows where he is
going harmonically, but this movement is in conventional
concerto-style and sounded like it. Both pianist and conductor
proved more yielding than they had been in the Szymanowski, although
some of the brass interventions were unnecessarily brash. Ax’s
virtuosic style was more appropriate here. I only wish that the
programme had amounted to more than the sum of its parts.
Mark Berry
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page