Other Links
Editorial Board
-
Editor - Bill Kenny
-
Deputy Editor - Bob Briggs
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN AND HEARD
UK CONCERT REVIEW
Mendelssohn and Schumann:
Steven Isserlis (cello). Orchestre des Champs-Élysées; Philippe
Herreweghe (conductor) Barbican Hall London 24.1.2009 (MMB)
Mendelssohn:
The Hebrides Overture (Fingal’s Cave), Symphony No. 3 “Scottish”
Schumann:
Cello Concerto in
A minor
Tonight’s concert was part of the excellent 2008-2009 Great
Performers series, organised by the Barbican every year; this time
featuring the Orchestre des Champs-Élysées, led by their founder,
the distinguished Belgian conductor Philippe Herreweghe, with
renowned British cellist Steven Isserlis.
The programme opened with Mendelssohn’s The Hebrides Overture,
one of his most enduringly popular works in Britain. The composer
first sketched his ideas for this piece during a trip he made to
England and Scotland, as a young man of twenty. He actually wrote
the main theme, in B minor, the day before setting out on a boat
journey, to visit the sea caves on the island of Staffa, part of the
Inner Hebrides in Scotland. Mendelssohn completed the first version
in Rome, in 1830, as a present to his father, and called it
Overture to a Lonely Isle. He then revised the full piece in
1832 as Die Hebriden (The Hebrides), dedicated to pianist
Ignaz Moscheles (1794-1870). This was the version that the composer
conducted himself, at the premiere of the piece in May 1832 for
the London Philharmonic Society. Immediately after its first
performance, Mendelssohn revised the work once again and called this
final version The Hebrides Overture, however it was published
in 1835 as Fingal’s Cave. It is a relatively short piece,
beautifully liquid, with a dark main theme in B minor, which
reinvents itself through repetition before the second theme in D
major begins. This is a wonderful melody played by the cellos and
bassoons, possibly one of the greatest ever written by Mendelssohn,
according to some of the composer’s enthusiasts. The piece finishes
softly on pizzicato strings and timpani, underlined by a
flute. Herreweghe led the Orchestre des Champs-Élysées in a vivid,
stimulating, performance of the piece, making it easy to imagine the
cliffs, the waves and the wind. His decision of having the orchestra
in an antiphonal placement, with the cellos and violas in the
middle, flanked by the first and second violins, and with the double
basses in a row at the back, definitely contributed to the “wave”
effect of the piece.
Fingal’s Cave
was followed by a very different work: Robert Schumann’s Cello
Concerto in A minor. This concerto, together with Dvořak’s, is one
of my favourite pieces for the instrument, though Schumann’s, unlike
Dvořak’s, has often been dismissed as poorly written. On the one
hand, this is possibly due to the work’s lack of flashy virtuosity,
which does not mean it is easy but that the piece is subtle,
revealing a deep understanding of the instrument. The naturally sad
sound of the cello is the true star and not the soloist. On the
other hand, the orchestral part is deceptively thin, in the sense
that it is unobtrusive and more transparent than other concert works
by the composer, his Piano Concerto for example, also in A minor.
For this performance of Schumann’s intensely lyrical piece,
Herreweghe and the orchestra were joined by cellist, and children’s
author, Steven Isserlis, with his wonderful Feuermann Stradivarius
cello of 1730, kindly loaned by The Nippon Music Foundation of
Japan. Isserlis has often championed Schumann’s Cello Concerto and
the composer is, according to Isserlis, one of his passions.
Isserlis is an inspired musician and his commitment to the
instrument and the music were obvious throughout the performance. He
beautifully underlined Schumann’s lyricism, extracting a luminous
sound from the instrument and providing some truly moving moments,
particularly during the second Langsam (slow)movement; a
wonderful melody, expressed with tenderness and great delicacy. He
plays the cello with an elegant stroke of the bow, approaching the
instrument in a rather soft, sensitive and caring manner. In fact, I
felt this was occasionally a little too much, as during a few of the
slightly more powerful passages for the orchestra, Isserlis appeared
almost as if he were miming; one could watch him play but could not
hear him. This fact, together with his continuous adjustments to the
cello’s endpin, was a bit distracting. I found myself wondering if
he thought that the precious Stradivarius would simply disintegrate
at his feet, should he attempt to play it in a more assertive
manner. Nevertheless, his interpretation of Schumann’s piece was
overall very satisfying, with great musical integrity and beauty,
doing full justice to the composer and performed without breaks
between movements, as Schumann intended.
The Orchestre des Champs-Élysées accompanied Isserlis’s
interpretation very effectively, suitably keeping in the background,
cushioning the soloist instead of overwhelming him. This was
expertly and discreetly achieved by Herreweghe who I often find too
remote in his interaction with orchestra and solo musicians.
However, in this instance, I must say that his distant, sober
conducting style excellently served Schumann’s Cello Concerto and
Isserlis’s performance.
After the interval, Herreweghe and the orchestra returned for
Mendelssohn’s Scottish Symphony, therefore returning to the
composer’s trip to Scotland. Mendelssohn’s Symphony is, like
Schumann’s Cello Concerto, in the key of A minor and, again like
Schumann’s piece, its four movements are intended to be played
without a break. It was actually the last symphony out of a total of
five that Mendelssohn composed; the number three is related to the
publishing order. The Scottish Symphony is a dark piece, deeply
contrasting with his Italian (the number 4 in A major from 1833).
The gloomy aspects of the work were possibly influenced not only by
the usually poor weather of Scotland but also by Mendelssohn’s visit
to the ruined palace of Mary, Queen of Scots. As is generally known,
he was moved by it and he wrote to his family that he had found
there the beginning of his Scottish Symphony. He wrote sixteen bars
of it but then moved to other projects, only returning to the
symphony twelve years later, finally completing it in January 1842.
It was performed in England in the same year and, upon its success,
Mendelssohn was permitted to dedicate it to Queen Victoria.
With the “Scottish”, the musicians of the Orchestre des
Champs-Élysées and their conductor really came into their own.
Again, Herreweghe’s antiphonal placement of the orchestra
effectively made the work shine. His conducting style changed a
little during this piece; he became more energetic, his enthusiasm
for the work was genuine and contagious and the orchestra followed
his lead and a special rapport was created. I must say that the
Scottish Symphony is a work that I like but not one that I care to
listen to very often. Its beauty is unquestionable but its bleakness
tends to depress me, leaving me fretting about the gray, damp
weather of the British Isles and longing for the hot, luminous
summer days of some Southern European country. Surprisingly and for
the first time, I felt differently towards this Symphony and this is
entirely due to Herreweghe’s, and the Orchestre des Champs-Élysées’s
credit. Although they made short breaks between the first and second
movements and then between the second and third, they gave it a
positive energy and an optimistic edge that to me was unprecedented.
The darkness was still present but there was a light at the end of
the tunnel, a triumph over adversity, which I believe was an
interpretation very close to the composer’s intentions. I still
prefer the Italian Symphony, with its lively, radiant, sunny tunes,
but this interpretation of the “Scottish” by Philippe Herreweghe and
the Orchestre des Champs-Élysées was truly wonderful and arguably,
one of the best I have ever had the pleasure of witnessing. The
audience at the Barbican responded in a very positive way, giving
orchestra and conductor long, enthusiastic and well deserved
applause, which made Mr Herreweghe return to the stage and give a
brief, but pleasant and welcome encore.
Margarida Mota-Bull
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page