Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN AND HEARD CONCERT REVIEW
Poulenc, Mahler:
Joanne Boag (soprano), Orchestra and Chorus of Welsh National Opera,
Alexander Polianichko, St. David’s Hall, Cardiff, 31.10.2008 (GPu)
Poulenc:
Gloria
Mahler:
Symphony No. 5
This ‘halloween’ concert was certainly far more treat than trick.
Both chorus and orchestra of the Welsh National Opera are
consistently amongst its greatest strengths and – almost without
exception in my experience – it is a pleasure to see and hear the
two of them with orchestra elevated from pit to stage and the chorus
in evening dress rather than in the costumes (of varying interest
and attractiveness) which designers require them to wear in their
productions.
The expanded orchestra heard in the major work here – Mahler’s Fifth
Symphony – gave a generally very good account of itself’ It is
certainly not overparted even when tackling works of such ambition
and scale. Of the chorus one need only say that they maintained the
very high standards one has come to expect when hearing them on the
operatic stage.
Alexander Polianichko is one of those very accomplished conductors
who seems not to have quite achieved ‘star’ status but who can
generally be relied upon (more than some such international ‘stars’)
to articulate performances that have assurance, a clear sense of
purpose and good orchestral balance. All these virtues were evident
in this largely convincing performance of the Mahler.
The mournful grandeur of the work’s opening worked very well, the
interplay of brass and strings balanced with particular sensitivity
(the solo trumpet work throughout was outstanding). Himself
originally a violinist, Polianichko drew particularly lyrical
playing from the violins, here and elsewhere, but not at the cost of
any neglect of larger issues of form and balance. Indeed
Polianichko’s sense of the movement’s shape, of the larger arc of
its musical argument, was particularly impressive. In the A minor
second movement (marked “Stürmisch bewegt, mit grösster Vehemenz”)
we didn’t perhaps quite get the “greatest vehemence” that Mahler
calls for; at times there was a sense of strain and of evident
effort and there was less certainty in Polianichko’s transition
between sections, the ‘gear-changes’ (of which this movement has
several) were sometimes a little ragged. But there were also moments
of radiant beauty. On the other hand, Part Two of the symphony, the
lengthy Scherzo in D major, was an unqualified success. The spirit
of the dance pervaded it all, even if, as the music requires, the
rhythms were sometimes ironically disrupted. The opening of the
movement convincingly breathed the air of the Austrian countryside
(and we were reminded that much of the symphony was written at the
cottage in the grounds of Mahler’s villa close to Maiernigg, on the
bank of the Wörthersee, in the Corinthian Alps). The central trio
section, on the other hand, danced with a rich endowment of Viennese
sophistication, a model of grace and clarity, textures thoroughly
transparent, for all the near-swooning of some of the string
playing. Indeed, the work of the upper strings was a delight in the
evocation of the ballroom. In this movement, as elsewhere in the
work, the writing for the horns is subtle and central to the musical
textures – the horns did it something like full justice in this
performance. Polianichko’s control of the movement’s shape was
impressive and he brought it to a rousing conclusion.
The reading of the Adagietto – at a moderate tempo which avoided the
extremes of some performances – was thoroughly engaging. It had a
quiet intensity, a persuasive intimacy that well communicated the
wistful quality of the music. If this is to be seen as a kind of
(love) song without words to Alma Mahler, then in this performance,
at any rate, one sensed an undercurrent of fear – the fear of
failure and loss – in the music’s expression of the composer’s
feelings about this beautiful flirtatious younger woman (she was
twenty years younger than Mahler). It is music of passionate
elegance and this was a satisfying reading of it, which brought out
some of its emotional ambiguities and complexities.
In the Rondo–Finale Polianichko’s judgement of dynamics was
particularly astute, the movement’s sense of momentum tactfully
established and controlled, and the echoes of musical materials
first heard in the second and fourth movements clarified without
excessive underlining. By the time that we reached the brass chorale
at the end of the work, the effervescence of what had immediately
preceded it had prepared us successfully for this triumphantly
affirmative music. Polianichko and the orchestra had led us, with an
emotional plausibility that went far beyond mere rhetoric, on a
journey which combined both power and intimacy, from opening
darkness to closing light.
This wasn’t one of the very greatest performances of the symphony
one is ever likely to hear, but that was hardly the expectation
which one might appropriately have brought to the concert. What it
was, was an intelligently sensitive and, for the most part,
purposively structured reading of a demanding and complex work. It
made for a very rewarding musical experience.
The evening had opened with a performance of Poulenc’s Gloria, one
of those late religious work which followed Poulenc’s 1936
pilgrimage to the Shrine of Our Lady at Rocamadour, overlooking the
gorge of the River Alzou, north east of Cahors. It is a fine work,
blending reverence (in terms both of faith and musical tradition)
and a characteristically Poulencian mischief. Right from the
beginning one had confidence in this performance, the tricky balance
of voices and orchestral sections at the beginning of the opening
‘Gloria in excelsis Deo’ convincingly achieved, and with a pleasing
sense of comfort and ease. The choral basses were especially
impressive here, providing a firm grounding for the fanfare-like
declamation of the text. In the ‘Laudamus Te’ (which initially
scandalised some hearers), chorus, orchestra and conductor all
seemed to revel in the rhythmic impetus of Poulenc’s writing, its
affirmation of the possible coexistence of spirituality and
playfulness, its pentatonic melodies and dancing rhythms thoroughly
captivating. Equally successful was the tranquillity of the ‘Domine
Deus, Rex Caelestis’ which succeeds it. Joanne Boag was an eloquent
soprano soloist, singing with real purity at the top of her range
and with some attractive fullness of tone lower down. Her voice is
maturing rapidly and attractively and this was as convincing a
performance as I have heard from her. There was an appropriately
Debussy–like quality to some of the orchestral textures here. In the
relatively brief fourth section, Polianichko’s direction
unassumingly brought out the wit and inventiveness of the music, its
sheer and vital joy. In the fifth section, ‘Domine Deus, Agnus Dei’,
the orchestral introduction might perhaps have been a little darker
and weightier; Boag was again impressive in her control of pitch,
and if she didn’t quite achieve the rapt quality which the text and
music invite she responded well (as she did throughout) to
Polianichko’s very sympathetic conducting (his wealth of operatic
experience was surely not irrelevant here). Soloist, Chorus and
Orchestra were blended and balanced with exquisite judgement and
finesse in the closing section (‘Qui sedes’), rounding off a lovely
performance of a beautiful and moving work.
Glyn Pursglove
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page