Other Links
Editorial Board
-
Editor - Bill Kenny
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD CONCERT REVIEW
Haydn, Schubert and Ravel:
Tippett Quartet (John Mills and Jeremy Isaac
(violins), Dorothea Vogel (viola), Bozidar Vukotic
(cello), Wigmore Hall, London, 19.12.2008 (BBr)
Haydn:
String Quartet in C, op.20/2 (1772)
Schubert:
String Quartet in A minor D. 804 (1824)
Ravel:
String Quartet in F (1902/1903)
It says something about the strength, integrity and
power of a musical performance when, whilst enjoying
a drink in the Cock and Lion, after a Wigmore Hall
show, a member of the audience of that concert walks
up to you and your companion and enthuses for a few
minutes about what we had just heard. Such was the
impression made by tonight’s programme – you simply
had to share your enthusiasm with someone.
Starting with early Haydn it was obvious that the
Tippett Quartet – still a young group in the grand
scheme of things – had spent time thinking about what
it was going to play and how it was going to present
that music. Haydn’s Opus 20 set of quartets might
seem an easy option but it certainly isn’t. This
work, despite an outward air of easy going
melodiousness and happy japes, has much in it to
catch out the unwary performer. The striding first
movement was well handled, beautifully led by the
cello, the music really allowed to sing. The slow
movement is of deep seriousness and comes as a shock
but the players here placed it perfectly, making it a
logical continuation of musical thought – not always
an easy thing to do. The finale was especially
impressive, being marked to be played sotto voce
until the very end and this is what impressed most
about the Tippett’s playing – their ability to
achieve a real pianissimo, whilst still allowing the
audience to hear every strand, every nuance, of the
music clearly and precisely.
These same qualities were carried into Schubert’s
A minor work. There is an ineffable sadness to
the opening theme, as it oscillates between minor and
major, and, despite a little reticence from the first
violin, the atmosphere was well built. This
performance of the first movement had a real
symphonic feel to it and all four players gave
everything to make the music live before us. The
variations on a little tune from Rosamunde,
which makes up the slow movement, seemed very small
beer after the marvellously nervous Allegro,
but we were given a quite superb Minuet, filled with
lots of the melancholy of the first movement. The
finale is an odd piece for it’s a delightful, and
gentle, rustic dance, and it’s difficult to give this
movement the lightness it deserves because of what
has gone before. Bbut tonight the Tippetts did it
proud; it was light and buoyant, with a lovely
playfulness: the rather perfunctory ending came as
quite a shock. This was a splendid performance by any
standard.
After the interval we moved forwards nearly a century
to Ravel’s only essay in the form. This is a true
virtuoso work and it received a big performance, the
wild finale being especially exciting and giving a
sense of fulfillment not just to the work but to the
whole concert, for it was the only time the Tippetts
pulled out all the stops and let their collective
hair down in a barnstorming account of this thrilling
music.
A too small audience was most appreciative, as well
it might be. This was a superb exposition of three
fine quartets and with the intensity and
thoughtfulness the players put into their
interpretations one is already salivating at the
prospect of their next show.
Bob Briggs
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page