Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD INTERNATIONAL CONCERT REVIEW
Schnittke and Tchaikovsky:
Gidon Kremer (violin), Marie-Elisabeth Hecker (cello), Munich
Philharmonic, Christian Thielemann, Philharmonic Hall, Gasteig,
Munich, 30.10.2008 (JFL)
Schnittke:
MOZ-ART à la Haydn,
Concerto Grosso No.2 for Violin, Cello & Orchestra
Tchaikovsky:
Symphony No.6 “Pathétique”
Out of complete darkness – just a dim spotlight on conductor
Christian Thielemann – emerged the sounds of Alfred Schnittke’s MOZ-ART
à la Haydn, until the lights over the semi-circle of two small
string orchestras (five violins, viola, and cello each, one double
bass behind them) suddenly went on, timed precisely to the first
tutti entrance. The character of a game in this playful music around
two solo violins (taken by the principle first and second violins of
the Munich Phil) was underscored by the roving musicians who changed
positions – while playing – as the music dictated different
combinations among the players.
The ensuing romp is mildly humorous (it doesn’t take much to get a
classical music concert crowd laughing), and even Thielemann may
have reluctantly entered into the spirit. Mozart quotations, some
blatant and some more subtle, coexist peacefully with fragmented,
joyously dissonant, sounds, typical of the more harmless side of
Schnittke. As the music ended, the lights went out on stage again,
and in reference to Haydn’s 45th Symphony the players
left for the exits, the last notes sounding faintly from behind the
stage.
More accurate than inspired was the Concerto Grosso for
violin, cello, and large orchestra. It’s a bombastic work for 90+
players, including harpsichord, piano, a battery of classical
percussion instruments, drum kit, and electric guitar. Gidon Kremer
and the 21-year old Marie-Elisabeth Hecker performed the buzzing,
spiky solo parts, he with merry routine, she with aching sincerity.
The harpsichord busily stalks through the score where lyrical
‘historicist’ passages, percussion interruptions, huge orchestral
swells, flageolet wire-acts, the “Brandenburg theme” all took turns.
The climax of the third, Allegro, movement sounds like two
old fashioned Bach concerto performances thrown in with a
Shostakovich symphony rehearsal at feeding time. Unlikely repertoire
for Thielemann, who didn’t look completely at ease, but led the
orchestra with very economical means, great detail, and precision.
Some critics in Munich think that Tchaikovsky, too, is outside of
Thielemann’s realm. The excerpt from Eugene Onegin he
produced at the
Odeonsplatz Open Air in July,
however, suggested a happy relationship between the foremost
conductor of German romantic repertoire and the Russian romantic of
a more shallow persuasion. This Pathéthique bore that out.
Not surprisingly, the Parsifal opening was audibly Wagnerian
before the nutcrackerish lightness (the flutes, especially) intrudes
and creates the atmosphere of a
ballet-within-a-symphony.
To charm the ears (these, at least), Tchaikovsky’s 6th
Symphony should be played with sumptuous, rich orchestral sound
– but without giving in to the temptation of making it so syrupy
that the Bach & Beethoven reared listener goes into a diabetic
shock. If treated so, there’s actually a good deal of grim thunder
to be found in the Pathétique. Thielemann, who has committed
the score to memory (a notable sign of how much importance he
attaches to the work), did just that – and the Munich Philharmonic
delivered on the sound to go with it.
Instead of delving into ‘exploitable’ moments and melodies, as
Thielemann is successfully prone to do with Brahms, Wagner, or
Beethoven, he never allowed Tchaikovsky to linger uncomfortably. At
the same time, his tempi were of the usual flexibility so that the
parts taken at a brisk clip didn’t march toward the finish line with
undue haste. The brass collaborated beautifully, the softness of the
last cymbal clash in the third movement was astounding, the march
predictably precise without denying the frequent interjections of
gaiety, the arch and tension in the fourth movement superb. This was
a performance more deeply probing than I thought the music would
permit – perhaps not for lovers of sugar-coated Tchaikovsky, but
surely for those who suspect actual drama beneath the surface. There
is clearly something in Thielemann that responds to Tchaikovsky, and
it made for the finest account of the Pathéthique I have yet
heard in concert.
Jens F Laurson
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page