Other Links
Editorial Board
-
Editor - Bill Kenny
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD INTERNATIONAL OPERA REVIEW
Berg, Lulu: Soloists, Chorus and Orchestra of Lyric Opera of Chicago, Sir Andrew Davis (conductor) Civic Opera House, Chicago 22.11.2008 (JLZ)
Production:
Director: Paul Curran
Set Design: Kevin Knight
Lighting: David Jacques
Cast:
Animal Tamer/Athlete: Jan Buchwald
Alwa: William Burden
Dr. Schön/Jack the Ripper: Wolfgang Schöne
Lulu: Marlis Petersen
Painter/Sailor: Scott Ramsay
Professor of Medicine/Professor: Craig Irvin
Schigolch: Thomas Hammons
Prince/Manservant/Marquis: Rodel Rosel
Wardrobe Mistress/Schoolboy: Buffy Baggott
Countess Geschwitz: Jill Grove
Journalist: Corey Crider
Lyric Opera of Chicago’s new production of Alban Berg’s Lulu
is compelling musically, dramatically and visually. With its fine
cast which includes Marlis Petersen, one of the outstanding
musicians currently portraying the title role, the roles are covered
well, and the staging allows them to interact with each other
convincingly. The production itself is worthy of note for the
innovative tack which Kevin Knight has
taken from film.
Not only did Knight allow the character of Lulu to resemble Louise
Brooks, who created the role in Pabst’s famous film, Pandora’s
Box, but he also used the idea
of film to frame each act, from the tableaux
which opened them, to the scrimmed “Ende” at the conclusion of the
work. In approaching the design in this way, Knight integrated into
the production the musical sequence in the second act, for which
Berg recommended using film to show the trial, imprisonment, and
escape of Lulu, prior to her return to Alwa. The film was no longer
anomalous, but part of the visual language of this production. Thus,
other elements from film merged into the design to fine effect. With
the Louise-Brooks wig of medium-length black hair that seemingly
remains perpetually in place, Petersen resembled the image of Lulu
as immortalized on film, and the film
itself came to life in this production. With the visual
element unifying the performance and with
the fine leadership that Sir Andrew Davis has given it, this
production makes an important work
accessible to a wider audience.
As
Lulu, Marlis Petersen sang the role easily and convincingly. She has
captured the details of the part excellently,
with a facility
that other singers may not have. If her
voice was sometimes difficult to
hear, this was
the result of the sometimes thick textures in the score, which was
also
well
executed by the orchestra. Petersen’s phrasing made the
sometimes angular lines that Berg used to depict his character,
emerge with the remarkable clarity
otherwise. Her diction, the German of a native speaker,
contributed to her success in a role which she
has also played in Vienna
and other cities. And as
incongruous as it may seem, Petersen’s previous role at Lyric was as
Adele in the 2006-2007 season, an equally
memorable portrayal though in many ways
removed from the multidimensional Lulu of Berg’s opera. That aside,
the freshness and engaging tone that Petersen brought to Adele
actually enlivened her depiction of Lulu.
The vocal presence was useful in defining her character, with the
passages of Sprechstimme executed beautifully.
Likewise, Petersen’s speaking voice lent
authority to the limited passages of spoken dialogue at
critical points in the drama.
The entire cast formed a tight ensemble in this almost seamless
production. Jill Grove chracterised
Countess Geschwitz convincingly, with her fatal attraction to Lulu
clearly apparent and absent of any
affectation. In bringing to life the sometimes surrealistic
character of Geschwitz, Grove brought to it the kind of expression
that she used to create the role of the Nurse in last season’s
production of Strauss’s Frau ohne Schatten. Grove worked
very well with Petersen, especially in the second act, where
the chemistry between the two must occur almost instantaneously, and
the two reacted smoothly with Wolfgang
Schöne, who played Dr. Schöne, the tragic victim of Lulu’s
acknowledged sincere love.
As Schön,
Wolfgang
Schöne
re-created for this Lyric production a
role that has been a mainstay of his
career. He delivered with the same facility as Petersen, with
his baritone timbre working clearly through
the the entire score. Physically, he
brought his character to life with appropriate body language and
gestures denoting
the old man, especially in the second act, where Dr. Schön has
become as obsessive about Lulu’s other
lovers as Lulu herself was in attracting
them. The monologue in which
Schön
wields the pistol that will seal his own fate was a fine part of the
act, a point in this production in which the musical and theatrical
pitch was appropriately heightened.
Among the rest of the cast, the American
tenor William Burden was three-dimensional as Alwa.
No mere pawn of Lulu, Burden gave his part all of
the nuance that Wedekind wrote into
the character, and his delivery was
impeccable. Burden’s voice fits Alwa's music
nicely, and he made the sometimes
demanding lines seem effortless. Known for various roles in
Britten’s operas, Burden deserves attention for his solid approach
to the character of Alwa. At the end of the second act, the scene
where Alwa makes love to Lulu at the place
where his father, Dr. Schön, died, his
evocation of Lulu as an almost ideal beauty was memorable for its
soaring line and the seamless handling of
Berg’s music.
Thomas Hammons made the mysterious character of Schigolch
seem, at times, as much an earth-spirit as Lulu herself, since he,
of all the people in opera, seems to have
known her long before the action begins. His bass-baritone voice
lent appropriate weight to the role, which includes some lines that
must rise well above the stave.
In the same way, Jan Buchwald gave a fine reading to the dual roles
of Animal Tamer and Athlete. In the former role. Buchwald was
immediately effective in the prologue,
which started in this production on the main floor
of the theatre, before he moved to the stage and took the
audience into the action of the opera. Even though Buchwald was
sometimes difficult to hear form that position,
once again this seemed to be because he was
struggling against orchestral energy.
Of all the principals, the tenor Scott Ramsay seemed less engaged in
the role of the painter, the character whose interest in Lulu sparks
the chain of tragic deaths that are crucial to the plot. From the
musical level, he gave a fine reading, but
it may be that the blocking in this production needs to engage the
Painter more effectively to make his part
work as well as the others do. Lulu is
a difficult score that requires a deft hand at the dramaturgy,
something that emerged at times in the various parts
which Rodell Rosel had
- the humorous touches he gave to the part of the
manservant helped to play up Lulu’s presence as a force of nature
within her own household. His characterization of the Marquis
too gave a nice pointedness to that
role, which is crucial to Lulu's fateful
decisions.
Yet it is the principals who must resolve
the drama in the final act, with Petersen, Grove, and Burden
bringing the work to its dénouement. As Jack the Ripper,
Schöne’s determination is menacing from his
first entrance. The tragic ending is
cinematic in the best sense, and delivers the appropriate catharsis
to this highly charged work.
One of
the masterpieces of twentieth-century opera, Berg’s Lulu
becomes even more compelling in Lyric’s new production. Strong
theater on its own merits, the musical content serves the work
equally well.
Sir Andrew Davis gave remarkable shape to the lines of Berg’s score,
such that the dissonant idiom Berg chose for this work was
thoroughly accessible, and the musical
structures readily perceivable. It is encouraging to see the
audiences that Lyric Opera can attract to
its productions, and it is even more admirable when a
work like Lulu can attract full houses. Lyric
Opera of Chicago is to be commended not only for
bringing this powerful opera back for new audiences, but also
for creating a fine production
which enhanced the outstanding execution
of the music
to great effect.
James L. Zychowicz
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page