Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD CONCERT REVIEW
Rachmaninov, Stravinsky:
Nelson Goerner (piano), BBC National Orchestra of
Wales / Thierry Fischer (conductor), St. David’s Hall, Cardiff,
3.10.2008 (GPu)
Rachmaninov, Piano Concerto No.3
Stravinsky, The Firebird – complete
The beautifully shaped and played phrases
of the opening of Rachmaninov’s Third Piano Concerto immediately
gave one the feeling that the BBC National Orchestra of Wales was on
particularly good form and the remainder of the concert bore out
that initial confidence. The programme was made up of two
substantial works, both Russian in origin and written only a year
apart: 1909 for the Rachmaninov, 1910 for the Stravinsky). The
Rachmaninov concerto was written for performance in New York, the
composer giving the premiere with the New York Symphony Orchestra,
under Walter Damrosch on November 28th, 1909.
Stravinsky’s ballet was premuiered at the
Paris Opéra on June 25, 1910, conducted by Gabriel Pierné. The
juxtaposition of the two made for a fascinating evening.
Rachmaninov’s grandeur of gesture,
especially where the soloist is concerned, and perhaps the
regularity with which he himself played the concerto, for a long
time tended to encourage audiences to view it as a vehicle for
virtuoso pianism rather than an intregrated composition. While the
Argentinian pianist Nelson Goerner was certainly well able to handle
the technical demands of the piano part, and presented us with some
beautifully rippling runs and some percussive, declamatory playing,
one never had the sense that there was any mere display going on.
Resisting any temptation to draw attention to his own brilliance
(this was definitely not pianism à la Lang Lang), Goerner’s work was
fully integrated into a sense of the work seen nad heard whole –
there was non sense, as there can be with this concerto, of an
orchestra merely ‘accompanying’ a soloist. The clarity of Thierry
Fischer’s conducting, and the orchestra’s response to it, ensured
that the interrelationships which bind together most of the
materials in the first movement were clearly audible, and Goerner’s
eloquent and lucid work played its part in bringing out the
coherence of the movement. I remember reading somewhere comments
made by the critic Grigory Prokofiev after the Moscow premiere of
the work in April of 1910, when he wrote of the works “sincerity,
clarity and simplicity of musical thought”. These are not the
qualities which have always been uppermost in later renditions of
the work, but they were the dominant impressions one took away from
this particular performance. The opening of the Adagio was
especially beautiful, the playing of the woodwinds (here and
elsewhere) a particular joy. Pianist and conductor alike were again
striking in the clarity with which they elucidated the shape of the
movement, intimate attention to detail never being allowed to muddy
larger questions of form. The lucid honesty of Nelson Goerner’s
playing conveyed a real sense of thought and feeling, rather than
the glossy pre-packaged oratory that this movement can sometimes
elicit from pianists. The playing of the woodwinds was a particular
delight in this second movement. In the Finale energy levels were
high, but not merely frantic or frenetic, the tempos being well
judged, even if the central series of episodes ran the risk of
seeming rather shapeless before the emergence of the closing heroic
triumph. Perhaps here one did miss some of the sheer self
assertiveness of some performances, but the colours were certainly
resplendent and Goerner’s work, particularly at the lower end of the
keyboard, was unflamboyantly persuasive. Overall this may not have
been as dazzling as performances of the work sometimes are, but it
made out a very eloquent case for the musical virtues which the
concerto possesses and on which valuable light was thrown by there
not being any attempt to play it as a kind of glorified competition
piece.
The first half’s performance of Rachmaninov’s Third Concerto was
good; the second half’s Firebird was quite outstanding. It was, in
short, one of the finest performances I have heard the BBC National
Orchestra of Wales give in recent years. Both precise and evocative,
exceptionally transparent in texture where it needed to be, rich and
full elsewhere, this was a magical reading of a remarkable score.
This full 1910 score of The Firebird is hugely more impressive, more
overwhelming, than the any of the orchestral suites which the
composer later extracted and rearranged from it. The scope of the
work is enormous and the musical interest and inventiveness are such
that it is well capable of sustaining the listener’s interest
without the benefit of stage action – especially when performed as
well as this. Thierry Fischer’s subtle gradations of volume and
tempo throughout were beautifully calibrated, the dialogue between
solo instruments and between instrumental sections, often very witty
(in wholly serious fashion) were presented with exemplary sense of
style and purpose. From the opening darkness, rich in fairy tale
danger, the diabolus in musica in the lower strings, all that
followed seemed to grow with organic inevitability. The echoes of
Rimsky-Korsakov and Scriabin (and others) are real, but handled with
a respectful wit which is part of the pleasure of this ceaselessly
inventive score. The Firebird’s Dance was ravishing in its
glittering orchestration, evidently relished by Fischer and the
orchestra, and the Firebird’s yearning pleas for release after her
capture were beautifully stylised, ‘humanised’ to a point without
ever leaving the realm of folk-tale and myth. The music of the
Enchanted Princesses had a delicate playfulness with just the right
tinge of sentimentality and the horn solo which announced the
entrance of Prince Ivan was suitably heroic. The solo oboe in the
Khorovod, drawing as it does on a genuine Russian folk song (which
Stravinsky may have known from its appearance in a collection edited
by Rimsky-Korsakov) was exquisite in the suppleness of its phrasing,
the piece collapsing into an evocation of the love (and first kiss)
of Princess Unearthly-Beauty and Prince Ivan. After the trumpet
calls (taking us back to the diabolus in musica) we needed no stage
action, such was the panache of the orchestral playing, to be aware
of the presence of the multitude of slave girls and monsters,
soldiers, fiends and magicians (chief of them Kastchei). Whether in
the whirling rhythms or savagely accented rhythms of some of the
later dances, or in the pointillist and Ravellian delicacy and
subtlety of some of the orchestral evocations of beauty and love or,
for that matter, the soaring grandeur of the closing music triumph,
this was a marvellous reading, a constant stimulation to the
reader’s imagination. By turns joyous and ominous, haunting and
fierce, ethereal and infernal, heroic and tender, Stravinsky’s score
was performed with conviction and passion. It rightly received a
fiercely enthusiastic response from the audience in the hall. The
concert was being recorded for future broadcast on radio 3. If the
sound engineer’s do justice to it, it will be a concert well worth
catching.
Glyn Pursglove
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page