Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD RECITAL REVIEW
Chopin, Debussy, and Prokofiev:
Simon Trpčeski (piano). Wigmore Hall London 4.3.2008 (MB)
Chopin – Piano Sonata No. 2 in B flat minor, Op.3
Debussy – Children’s Corner
Prokofiev – Old Grandmother’s Tales Op.31
Prokofiev – Toccata in D minor, Op.11
Prokofiev – Piano Sonata no.7 in B flat major, Op.83
Simon Trpčeski possesses a phenomenal technique, but is also
clearly a fine musician with a mind of his own. Chopin’s second
sonata received a commanding reading, a couple of slips in the
scherzo notwithstanding. Trpčeski has an extraordinary fullness of
tone: undoubtedly pianistic, but also highly suggestive at times
of orchestral colours. This, one could tell, was someone born to
play a Steinway (and Rachmaninov). The first movement was
big-boned, at times almost Beethovenian in its sound, although
there is of course nothing Beethovenian about Chopin’s remarkably
original handling of sonata form. There was a true sense of a
cortège to the
Marche
funèbre,
which somewhat surprisingly put me in mind of the ‘Bydlo’ from
Mussorgsky’s Pictures at an Exhibition. The middle D flat
major section of this movement was especially notable. Taken at a
daringly slow pace, there was a daring spareness of texture allied
to the noble singing tone that was Trpčeski’s throughout the
recital. The Presto final movement sounded less spare, less
flickering, than is generally the case, but certainly worked well
in Trpčeski’s bolder interpretation of its moto perpetuo.
Indeed, there was a sense in which it therefore seemed more of a
‘finale’ than is often the case with a movement that bewildered
Schumann and Mendelssohn amongst others.
The six movements of Debussy’s Children’s Corner were
sharply and winningly characterised. Trpčeski’s Debussy is not a
composer of (post-)impressionist hazes, but paints in bold,
primary colours. This is Debussy for the Steinway, not the Erard.
I do not wish to imply absence of variegation. ‘Jimbo’s Lullaby’
was softer in touch and approach than, say, its predecessor,
‘Doctor Gradus ad Parnassum’, which fairly rattled through
Debussy’s affectionate parody of Clementi’s tedious keyboard
exercises. Yet mystery was not to the fore of this pianist’s
agenda. Occasionally, for instance in ‘The snow is dancing’, I
felt this as a lack, but there were compensations aplenty, not
least from Trpčeski’s tightness of rhythm, which did not preclude
well-considered rubati from time to time. This is a pianist
of aristocratic poise, as he would also show in the first of his
encores, the first Arabesque. The part-writing was
as clear as it would have been with Maurizio Pollini, but with a
more Romantic, less modernistic tone. In ‘Golliwogg’s cake walk’,
the gently mocking quotations from Tristan und Isolde were
wonderfully handled: full of character, yet integrated into the
general musical argument.
Prokofiev perhaps fared best of all. The Old Grandmother’s
Tales sounded duly nostalgic, pining for a Mussorgskian
‘Mother Russia’ that no longer existed, if ever it had. The
‘whiteness’ of Prokofiev’s piano writing – irrespective of key –
was married to a wonderful, vocal projection of line. This was
followed by a simply spellbinding Toccata, which never
relented and yet never lost that extraordinary fullness of tone. I
have long treasured Pollini’s recording of the seventh sonata as
hors concours, but upon the evidence of this recital,
Trpčeski is a serious rival. Indeed, his tone and more general
post-Romantic approach are arguably more appropriate than the
crystalline modernism of the Italian pianist. (In practice, of
course, there is absolutely no reason why one should choose; I
simply mention Pollini in order to signal the level of pianism at
which Trpčeski is operating.) The mechanical – war-like? – quality
of some of the first movement’s rhythms was once again projected
with an orchestral fullness of tone. This did not soften the hints
– and more – of barbarism, but rather heightened the tension. The
pianist’s singing tone and length of line present in the middle
Andante caloroso could not have been more impressive. And the
barbarism of the final Precipitato exceeded that of the
Toccata, which in retrospect at least now sounded jejune. The
relentless 7/8 rhythm put me in mind of the wilder reaches of
Bartók (in whose music I should love to hear Trpčeski), and once
again this was miraculously accomplished without the slightest
hardening of tone. There was an abandon which perforce had to
remain controlled, but one might never have guessed so as the
sonata was hurled towards its barnstorming conclusion. Trpčeski
had the measure of that strange marriage between percussive and
lyrical writing, which stands at the heart of Prokofiev’s writing
for his own instrument.
Mark Berry