Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD INTERNATIONAL OPERA REVIEW
Wagner, Tristan und Isolde:
Orchestra and Chorus of the Teatro Real.
Conductor: Jesús López Cobos.
Teatro Real de Madrid. 15 and 17. 1.2008. (JMI)
It is
clear that times in Spain are changing for the better in the field
of opera. For many years, Wagner operas in general and Tristan
in particular were mostly confined to Barcelona’s Liceu but
lately we have had performances of this masterwork in Barcelona,
Madrid, Bilbao and Oviedo. It is a topic in itself to speak about
the great difficulties of programming Tristan due to the
scarcity of suitable voices for the main roles, to which should be
added a good orchestra and a first rate conductor. In these
performances however, Madrid's Teatro Real has offered two
alternative casts and the final result is more than satisfactory,
although some shades of quality exist.
The alternative Isolde was American Jeanne-Michèle Charbonnet, a
soprano with a long track record in the heavier Wagnerian
repertoire. Her interpretation was full of good intentions and but
short on true quality. She is a good interpreter, but the vocal
problems are too many. Almost all of the high notes were
problematic, when not impossible, and she has an annoying and
uncontrolled vibrato, which in fact is uncontrollable at times. Pictures © Teatro
Real / Javier del Real
Production from Teatro San Carlo de Nápoles.
Director: Luis Pasqual
Sets: Ezio Frigerio.
Costumes: Franca Squarciapino.
Lighting: Wolfgang Von Zoubek.
Cast:
Tristan: Robert Dean Smith/Jon Fredric West.
Isolde: Waltraud Meier/Jeanne-Michèle Charbonnet.
King Marke: René Pape.
Brangaene: Mihoko Fujimura/Elena Zhidkova.
Kurwenal: Alan Titus/Alexander Marco-Buhrmester.
Melot: Alexander Marco-Buhrmester/Lauri Vasar.
The production comes from Naples and has stage direction by Luis
Pasqual. The real thread of this production is the sea, which is
clearly very appropriate: there's a large ship’s stern in the
first act, a garden full of trees on the seaboard in the second,
and a room with huge windows facing the ocean once again in the
Kareol act. The attractive sets, even the almost bare stage in
the last act, remind us much of Marthaller's concept at Bayreuth.
Mr. Pasqual's “originality” consists in presenting the work in
three different times: the Middle Ages for the journey, Romantic
times for Act II and modern times for Kareol. It's not too
convincing, but in fact it does not disturb much, which is
something worth noting nowadays. The costumes are always
beautiful, although I couldn’t stop thinking in Octavian and the
Marschallin during the love duet in the second act. There is good
work with the lighting, especially with the ever present ocean at
the back of the stage.
I had hoped that the fact that Pasqual transferred the action of
the second act to Romantic times might have served to remind Jesús
López Cobos that Tristan - and particularly its second act
- is the summit of romantic music. López Cobos is a very cerebral
conductor and in this kind of music you need heart and passion,
besides brains. His reading of this great second act was if he had
turned his back to stage and there was no emotion at all in his
interpretation. He was much improved on the last act, but that
seemed to me too late. The orchestra played very well, better
than their normal quality, although still a long way from what
one can enjoy with their colleagues in Valencia. López Cobos
received some sonorous booing after Act II on the first night.
Two days later however, he seemed more relaxed and confident and
the musical result was better, although still lacking passion and
inspiration.
Waltraud Meier has been one of the great Wagnerians of the last 20
years and I will not be discussing her artistic heights. She was
not at her best due to a throat problem during rehearsals though I
must recognize that it is almost impossible to attend to a more
intense and convincing interpretation of Isolde on stage than
hers. From a strictly vocal point of view her high register seemed
more problematic than it used to be: the high Bs were very
laborious and high Cs simply didn't exist or were shouted. I
confess that I suffered somewhat during the beginning of her great
duet with Tristan in the second act. I would rather forget all
this though and remember here for her Liebestod. Never mind
whether she is ill or in good health, she is a real icon in
Madrid.
Robert Dean Smith was a musical Tristan blessed with a beautiful
voice, but he does not have enough vocal power for rge character
in a large house like the Teatro Real. He is one of the most
important Wagnerian lyric tenors of the present time however, well
able to face up to - like very few others - parts such as
Lohengrin, Walther, Parsifal and Siegmund, but he is certainly not
a held. In his favour, is his intelligence which makes him
not to try to sing above his real abilities, always maintaining
vocal elegance and outstanding phrasing. Nevertheless, on more
than an occasion, his voice did not project over the orchestra.
This was particularly evident during the second act, which was
well sung, but short on volume. Surprisingly he was at his best in
the horrific last act, despite all the problems described. Robert
Dean Smith seems to me to be a Tristan with great qualities and
serious deficiencies, who may shine more brightly at Bayreuth, due
to its special acoustics.
Another American, Jon Fredric West, was the second Tristan and it
is fair to say that by combining the vocal beauty and musicality
of Robert Dean Smith and the vocal power of West we would get a
Tristan of reference standard. West is without a doubt the most
suitable voices for Tristan nowadays, if not the only one, but he
works best in the last act of the opera, where he provides an
outstanding display of power and vocal resource, truly spectacular
and unequalled by and other tenor at the present time. A
different matter though is how he deals with the rest of the
opera, and especially the second act. There is neither passion nor
controlled singing in what he does, but only decibels. If he were
able to sing as as well as he does through the second act and
could also add passion, he would then be the Tristan of reference.
As things stand, it best to remember his n the last act.
Of René Pape I can only say that he really is
Koenig Marke. “God save the King” was never was better deserved
than when dedicated to this extraordinary artist. Voice, diction,
elegance, feeling, phrasing, extraordinary deep notes and all –
round excellence add up to make him an immense singer. With
Mr. Pape on stage, this opera should really be retitled
Tristan, Isolde und Marke. I have the impression too that he
is developing into a deep bass more than the bass baritone, that
he has been formerly.
Japanese Mihoko Fujimura was a good Brangaene with a very well
structured voice, although with less weight in the low register
than in the past. Russian Elena Zhidkova made a lighter Brangaene
than we are used to. Young and beautiful, she is not the
traditional Isolde’s maid but is a convincing interpreter with an
attractive voice and sensitivity, even though her voice is not too
big.
Alan Titus was not convincing as Kurwenal, often singing too
loudly at and without much evidence of his character's
faithfulness to Tristan. Alexander Marco-Buhrmester was generally
lighter-voiced in the same part, but more credible and convincing
than Titus.
Alexandre Marco-Buhrmester was a luxurious Melot in the first cast
while Lauri Vasar was a suitable enough but tighter voiced. There
as a good performance by Angel Rodriguez as Shepherd and David
Rubiera completed the cast as the Steuermann.
As usual in Madrid, there was a packed house for both casts
although with some desertions from the expensive seats before the
last. The loudest popular successes were for Waltraud Meier, René
Pape and Jon Fredric West. Maestro Lopez Cobos received applause
mixed with boos at the first night, while in the second he had a
much better reception. Luis Pasqual was applauded too, which is
always good, despite the fact that nowadays it seems that
Directorial success is often directly related to the boos received
at the premiere.
Jose M. Irurzun