Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN AND HEARD RECITAL REVIEW
Schubert:
András Schiff
(piano). Wigmore Hall, London, 14.5.2008 (MB)
Four
Impromptus, D.899
Six Moments Musicaux, D.780
Three Klavierstücke, D.946
Four Impromptus, D.935
This was a frustrating recital. András Schiff, it goes without
saying, is an extremely fine musician, who has perhaps always been
most at home in the Classical repertoire (and Bach). His touch, as
once again displayed here, is almost unfailing beautiful, not for
its own sake, but at the service of the music. His beloved
Bösendorfer piano serves his approach supremely well: infinitely
yielding, never strident, at one with the music. One cannot fault
his musical seriousness, his absolute lack of empty showmanship, nor
the evident fondness of his advocacy for Schubert.
What, then, was the problem? Sad to say, it lay in the programme
itself. What could be wrong with an all-Schubert programme? Nothing,
but the organisation of this particular all-Schubert programme was
unfortunate. To perform the first three sets of pieces prior to the
interval made for a very long ‘half’: an hour and a half. For much
of the Three Piano Pieces, D.946, a large part of the
audience seemed restless and even Schiff seemed at times a little
tired. Doubtless the heat did not help, but I suspect the upshot
might have been similar even in the dead of winter. It was telling
that a number of audience members did not return after the interval
– which was a great pity, since there were musical riches aplenty to
be heard. However, it was not simply the length of the recital,
which, beginning at half-past seven, did not end until about ten
past ten. The concentration of so many Schubert pieces, without a
single sonata, or indeed movement in sonata form, had the extremely
unhappy consequence of making them sound too similar, especially
those in ternary form. I am not convinced that the Moments
musicaux are heard to best advantage as a set, but they were
certainly not in this context; I rather think the programme would
have been better without any of them, save perhaps as an encore or
two. What might have made very good sense in a recording, namely
collecting a good number of non-sonata works by Schubert, does not
necessarily work as a recital programme.
I had heard the C minor Impromptu, D.899/1, in the same hall, six
nights previously from
David Fray. Schiff’s was a different performance, less
Romantically volatile, but at least as fine. His subtle rubato was
exquisitely tuned to the twists and turns of the music, whilst the
Erlkönig-like triplets were suitably implacable. Inner
voices, where they existed, were projected powerfully, to what was
perhaps a surprising extent; so too were bass lines. The lightness
of touch with which Schiff opened the second impromptu provided a
great contrast from the outset, without precluding sterner
minor-mode moments, even within the opening material, let alone in
subsequent sections. Left-hand dissonances later on were keenly
projected, in almost Bartókian fashion. Throughout this set, though
especially in the second and fourth pieces, I was impressed by the
lack of any vain attempt to hide the sectional nature of Schubert’s
writing; instead, Schiff made a structurally contrasting virtue of
it. Fray had also performed the G flat impromptu, no.3. If his
performance had put me in mind of Mendelssohn, then Schiff’s did
even more; there were even shades of Bach, in the near-complete
obliteration of any distinction between melody and harmony. Here was
a voice of great experience, yet an experience in no sense weary.
The Moments musicaux started well and, if the truth be told,
continued well; my doubts concerned the programming rather than the
performances as such. With the first, Schiff started extremely
promisingly, providing a contrasting, quirkier Schubertian voice,
married to an intensely lyrical middle section. A truly impassioned
outburst performed a similar structural-expressive function in the
second. Rhythms were nicely sprung in the celebrated – and
considerably shorter – third piece, in F sharp minor. But by the
time we reached the fifth, the only truly quick piece in the set,
the relief was palpable, this despite great success purely on its
own terms in projecting the quicksilver mood swings of the fourth.
The sixth piece, sadly, sounded more like a reversion than anything
new.
It was with the Three Piano Pieces, D.946, that even Schiff
himself began to seem a little tired: not that there were
inaccuracies, but dynamic and rhythmic contrasts at least appeared a
little dulled at times. The first piece suffered least in this
regard; indeed, its mood-swings were very well captured. When it
came to the second, the barcarolle sections were achingly beautiful,
but I felt that the first of the minor-key episodes was somewhat
under-characterised, with the consequence that it came to sound
prolix. There was no such problem with the second of these episodes,
whose metrical change registered truly magically, exhibiting a
pathos all the finer and truer for its complete lack of
exaggeration. Audience restlessness, married to an undeniable
similarity of mood between the first and third pieces, resulted in a
sense of relief that the interval had finally arrived.
Duly refreshed, I felt in a much better position to enjoy the D.935
set of impromptus. There could be no doubt that Schiff was in his
element here. Without attempting to wield the pieces closer together
than their character could bear – Schumann was surely incorrect to
dub them as a sonata in disguise – a looser unity, born of contrast
as much as similarity, was confidently forged. The great strengths
of Schiff’s technique and musicianship were allowed to shine,
without the marring fatigue that had set in during the first ‘half’.
For instance, although the second impromptu, in A-flat major, is
rather similar in character and indeed in piano-writing, to some of
the Moments musicaux, here it gained from its placing with
more contrasted pieces. The grand manner of the opening of the first
was surely contrasted with the most tender lyricism that followed.
During the third, a truly exquisite set of variations, there was a
sense of proliferation, of variety, rather than of undue
regimentation, which suited Schubert’s brand of variation-writing
perfectly. The anguish of the third variation was the more telling
for developing, rather than being imprinted upon Schiff’s reading
from the outset. And the quirky Hungarian style of the fourth suited
him equally. The ambivalence and complications of metre were married
to an exquisite legato in the more lyrical sections. There was no
lack of virtuosity in the passage-work, but the word seems almost
beside the point in describing so utterly musical an account. What a
pity, then, that the impact of such a performance remained somewhat
blunted by its overall context.
Mark Berry
Seen and Heard's Emeritus Editor Peter Grahame Woolf,
expressed a similar opinion about the programming for this
recital on his site
Musical Pointers. [Ed]
Back to Top Cumulative Index Page