Other Links
Editorial Board
-
Editor - Bill Kenny
-
London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
-
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD INTERNATIONAL CONCERT REVIEW
Bach, Webern, Berg, and Schoenberg:
Scharoun Ensemble and guests, Barbara Hannigan (soprano); Pierre
Boulez (conductor). Philharmonie: Kammermusiksaal, Berlin.
18.4.2008 (MB)
Bach-Webern – Ricercare a 6, from The Musical Offering, BWV
1079
Webern – Five Movements, for string quartet, Op.5
Webern – Three Songs, for voice, E flat clarinet, and
guitar, Op.18
Webern – Concerto for flute, oboe, clarinet, horn, trumpet,
trombone, violin, viola, and piano, Op.24
Berg – Seven Early Songs, arr. for ensemble by Reinbert de
Leeuw
Schoenberg – Chamber Symphony no.1 in E major, Op.9
This concert marked the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Scharoun
Ensemble, the new music ensemble – albeit with a repertoire
extending back to the Baroque – founded by six members of the
Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra and two other musicians. Two of the
original members remain: Peter Riegelbauer on the double bass and
horn-player Stefan de Leval Jezierski. Today’s ensemble of eight
was joined by a number of other instrumentalists, including other
members of the Berlin Philharmonic and, most laudably, its
orchestral academy. So high was the quality of solo and ensemble
playing that I think it would have been impossible for anyone
successfully to distinguish between members and guests, although
doubtless the absolute security of the core players was crucial to
the integration of the others. Indeed, such is the ensemble’s
calibre that it was able to secure none other than Pierre Boulez
to conduct. It was good to see Sir Simon Rattle in the audience
too.
I do not think that I had previously heard Webern’s celebrated
Bach transcription performed by an ensemble of soloists rather
than by full orchestra. The good news is that it works extremely
well. (There is no bad news.) This performance struck a
finely-judged note between chamber and orchestral music. It was
notable that the instrumentalists were listening to each other as
chamber musicians, whilst also taking their cue from Boulez. This
in fact was a characteristic of the rest of the programme too (bar
Webern’s Op.5, which was not conducted). Boulez did not resort to
the generous, some might say exaggerated, rubato that a
conductor such as Esa-Pekka Salonen has employed in this work.
Instead, the music unfolded with supremely natural inevitability.
It was perhaps more beautiful than I had ever heard before; this
was not, however, a surface beauty, but representative of an
extraordinary polyphonic and timbral richness. The linear
transitions between instruments registered Webern’s
Klangfarbenmelodie with a well-nigh perfect balance between
similarity and difference.
Webern’s Five movements for string quartet received a performance
at least as good as any I have heard. It was more rich in string
tone than the
Arditti Quartet performance I heard last year: not necessarily
better, but certainly different. The viola opening to the second
movement, matchlessly performed by Micha Aufkham, sounded as ripe
as late Brahms, and put me quite appropriately in mind of Brahms’s
sonatas for viola and piano. This did not preclude violence where
necessary, as in the eruption of the Sehr bewegt third
movement. The full-blooded delicacy – the contradiction is
deliberate – of those achingly rare wisps of sound in the fifth
movement displayed another extreme of Webern’s and the ensemble’s
soundworld. One was made to listen, not with the ultra-extremity
of Nono’s music, but with an appreciation that this music lay
somewhere between Brahms and Nono. In fact, I have never heard the
work, or at least parts of it, sound so close to Verklärte
Nacht.
Soprano Barbara Hannigan and guitarist Wilhelm Bruck joined the
ensemble for Webern’s Op.18 songs. This is not one of Webern’s
most ingratiating works but it is difficult to imagine a better
performance. The strange dissocation between words and text in
‘expressive’ terms registered but, more importantly, so did the
sense that the words suggest, indeed almost determine, the musical
form. Each player’s – the third was Walter Seyfarth – ability not
only to sound but also to express the intervals in his or her line
ensured that the result was never clinical. As, of course, did
Boulez. I was a little surprised, but also delighted, by the
late-Romantic rubato he employed during the second song,
Erlösung. There seemed to me little doubt that Boulez’s
approach to Webern has now been influenced by his recent work on
Mahler and no doubt whatsoever that Webern benefited. Seyfarth
ensured that the high pitch of the E flat clarinet never became
shrill, and the lengthy – at least in Webern’s terms! –
instrumental postlude to the third song evinced a perfect match
between timbral beauty and pin-point precision.
The first half came to an end with the masterpiece that is
Webern’s Op.24 Concerto. A defining characteristic of this
performance was that it truly was a concerto for (small)
orchestra. Each instrument had and took its opportunity to shine,
whilst never forgetting its place within the whole. Whilst it is
invidious to single out any performer, I especially appreciated
Wolfram Brandl’s sweet-toned violin and the splendidly
neo-Brahmsian piano part as presented by Holger Groschopp.
Rhythmic definition, just as important here as in Stravinsky or
Bartók, was superb throughout, imparting a real sense of a
concerto finale to the third movement, Sehr rasch.
Hannigan returned for Reinbert de Leeuw’s arrangement of Berg’s
Sieben frühe Lieder. I had not heard the arrangement before,
but thought it worked very well, cleverly incorporating aspects of
Second Viennese practice in transcription of other music, not
least the use of the harmonium, but also the scoring in general.
The songs lay relatively low for Hannigan’s voice, allowing her to
exhibit a richness that one might not have expected. This was not
the richness of a Jessye Norman, of course, but it was certainly
enough for an ensemble of this size. Indeed, there was a real
sense of the singer being part of the ensemble, first among
equals, rather than simply a ‘soloist’. Hannigan imparted a
considerable erotic charge to much of the music, for instance in
the final line, ‘O gib act! Gib acht!’ of Nacht, or the
Treibhaus-atmosphere of Die Nachtigall. She really
worked with the words, almost all of them perfectly discernible,
to produce music that appeared to emanate from them. The solo
strings were almost unbelievably rich in tone, violist Micha
Aufkham once again forming the expressive heart of the ensemble,
visibly – and audibly – attentive to his colleagues and to the
conductor. The instrumental postlude to Traumgekrönt was
simply exquisite. Clarinettist Alexander Bader beautifully sounded
the summer wind in Liebesode, followed by a telling
recognition of the harmonic shift on ‘Und aus dem Garten…’ from
soprano, conductor, and the entire ensemble. Boulez imparted a
true sense of progression and unity to the songs, ensuring that
there was no sense of miscellany.
Crowning this wonderful evening was, quite simply, the best
performance of Schoenberg’s first chamber symphony I have heard,
whether live or recorded. I have never experienced the work as
quite so symphonic before, which is testament to the prowess of
the players and to Boulez’s guiding hand. Inner parts sounded and
told as if they were lines in a Brahms symphony – and, of course,
one is not very far at all from Brahms, motivically or even
harmonically. Every single line told from every member of the
ensemble, and yet the whole was far greater, far richer than the
considerable sum of the parts. Problems of balance never even
seemed to be an issue, which in this of all works is a staggering
achievement. The characterisation of each of the four movements
within the single-movement overall plan was sharper than I can
recall in any other performance, but their integration was just as
remarkable. Rarely if ever can the sense of Schoenberg not only
synthesising but also extending the paths of Brahms and Wagner
have been so readily yet un-self-consciously apparent. Speeds were
far from slow but the music relaxed when necessary, never sounding
hard-driven, as can often been the case, and even used to be the
case with this conductor. Boulez must re-record this work – and
with these players. Better still, the entire concert should be
released as a live recording. It was a perfect celebration of a
great ensemble.
Mark Berry