Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD OPERA REVIEW
Strauss, Salome:
Soloists,
Orchestra of the Royal Opera House, Philippe
Jordan (conductor) The
Royal Opera, London.23.2.2003 (MB)
Cast:
Salome –
Nadja Michael
Herodias –
Michaela Schuster
Page to Herodias –
Daniela
Sindram
Herod –
Robin
Leggate
Narraboth –
Joseph
Kaiser
Jokanaan –
Michael
Volle
First Nazarene –
Iain
Paterson
Second Nazarene –
Julian
Tovey
First Soldier –
Christian
Sist
Second Soldier –
Alan Ewing
First Jew –
Adrian
Thompson
Second Jew –
Martyn
Hill
Third Jew –
Hubert
Francis
Fourth Jew –
Ji-Min
Park
Fifth Jew –
Jeremy
White
A Cappadocian –
Vuyani
Mlinde
Slave –
Pumeza
Matshikiza
Production:
David McVicar (director)
Es Devlin (designs)
Wolfgang Göbbel (lighting)
Andrew George (choreography)
Mark Grimmer and Leo Warner (video design)
David McVicar’s reputation seems to be riding high in the operatic
world at the moment, especially amongst those impatient with the
more or even less extreme instances of Continental Regietheater.
His La Clemenza di Tito for the English National Opera was
a very fine production, which truly breathed life into the
characters of an opera seria that has often been deemed
problematical (largely, I should add, on account of inappropriate
expectations). I liked his
Covent
Garden Magic Flute, which, in spite of a strangely
disappointing final scene, had plenty of magic to it and in that
sense – praise be! – suggested engagement with the music, although
much less with the work’s profounder themes. Handel’s Giulio
Cesare he appears to have dealt with by sending it and its
genre up. (I say ‘appears to’ since I have not seen it myself, so
am relying on reports.) Spectacle clearly appeals to McVicar and
to much of his audience: this was the first time in many years I
can recall applause uncontaminated by booing for the production
team. There is something populist about his general approach which
risks becoming merely conservative, capitulating to notions of
opera as a ‘show’, a ‘good night out’, rather than a critical
force. Deconstruction can be taken too far and should never become
the only game in town, but questioning of a work’s claims does no
harm whatsoever; indeed, a viable work will thereby be
reinvigorated, instead of being condemned to the slow and painful
death of a museum piece.
This was certainly not a ‘conservative’ production in the sense of
adhering to stage directions and period costume. Instead, the
action was updated to what seemed to be the 1920s or ’30s,
although little, so far as I could tell, was made of this; in
which case, why bother? It is not as if Salome were written
during the inter-war period. There was perhaps an implication of
violence being endemic to this period, but is that not the case
for any time one might choose – and certainly for the ancient
world? More seriously, the production titillated rather than
challenged. In one very important respect, I believe it
misrepresented and domesticated the work: Salome emerged
more as a house of controlled and ultimately somewhat camp horrors
than as dangerously erotic. An exception was Salome’s treatment of
John the Baptist’s severed head, which truly shocked and was
justly both horrific and erotic. I am not at all sure why Naaman,
the executioner, emerged naked from the cistern, nor why he had
all along been wearing only an overcoat, but it gave the actor
Duncan Meadows, who played his odd part very well, an opportunity
to show off his muscular, albeit excessively bloodstained
physique. It must have been a very messy beheading.
The set was striking in its way, with a split-level
‘upstairs-downstairs’ arrangement, so that we saw the Tetrarch’s
dinner party proceeding upstairs as the action proceeded
downstairs. However, it made little sense for the dining company
to repair downstairs; it would be a very odd dinner party that
ended up in the servants’ quarters. Wolfgang Göbbel conveyed a
suggestion of moonlight, which of course is all too present in the
score, but this sat awkwardly with the setting in a basement. The
extras were attentively directed, although I thought the presence
of the Jews was slightly exaggerated. This may have been a
reference to the updating, but it did not seem to lead anywhere.
The Dance of
the Seven Veils was especially odd. I suspect this may be the
first case of Salome actually gaining rather than discarding
clothes. This would certainly have defied expectations, not least
given the melodramatic announcement that the production would
contain scenes of nudity and violence – it would be an odd
Salome that did not – but I am not sure to what end. This
dance was more akin to a balletic pas de deux in which
Salome and Herod danced through seven rooms and for some reason
she tried on what appeared to be a wedding dress before petulantly
rejecting it. There was something appropriately nauseating to the
action, assisted by Philippe
Jordan’s
attentive conducting – attentive, that is, to the events on stage
– but this was the only aspect I found comprehensible. The filmic
‘symbolism’ was predictably heavy-handed, as is usually the case
with what, with rare exceptions, is a hyper-realistic medium. A
doll presumably indicated that Herod’s lusts were of long
standing; a slow, awkward, melodramatic unzipping must have been
just that. The exploding light bulb defeated me. At any rate, I
assume that the stage-film relationship was this way round:
perhaps the film indicated what was ‘really’ going on, and the
stage action was ‘symbolic’. Either way, it failed to cohere. None
of the several people I asked after the performance had the
faintest idea what had been intended on stage, let alone depicted.
Jordan’s reading of the score revelled in its phantasmagorical
elements. There were wonderful instances of exotic woodwind lines
twisting and swirling, which are often lost in Strauss’s luxurious
orchestration. In this sense, it was quite a ‘French’-sounding
reading, which, given the work’s roots in perfumed French
décadence seems a perfectly legitimate approach. That said,
there were too many errors from the brass early on. And one
crucial element, arguably the most crucial of all, only revealed
itself during later scenes, namely the glow of the strings. For at
least the first half of the opera, they had sounded unduly muted
and did not really form the bedrock of the sound. Jordan’s account
also became structurally more cohesive as the work proceeded. The
punctuation of Herod’s entreaties with Salome’s insistence upon
the ‘Kopf des Jochanaan’ was very well handled in terms of tempo
and orchestral response. Salome’s words, searingly delivered by
Nadja Michael, functioned as a kind of ritornello.
Perhaps subsequent performances will iron out the earlier
difficulties experienced on this, the opening night.
In the title role, Michael impressed. She hit most of the right
notes, and paid commendable attention to the words and their
meaning. Not only can she act; she also looks the part. Given her
recent conversion to soprano roles, it should not surprise that
her voice lacked a little in sheer Straussian refulgence. She was
not the ‘sixteen year old princess with the voice of an Isolde,’
which Strauss so cruelly suggested, but she was an excellent
Salome of a slightly lighter variety. Michael Volle was a towering
presence in the role of Jokaanan, although the production’s
conception of him as a ‘Beckettian tramp soaked in sewage’ worked
against the intrinsic nobility of the role. Robin Leggate,
standing in for an ailing Thomas Moser, was a fine Herod. Here
campness is quite justified, although it was not overdone. But the
words and their vocal shaping matter too, as Leggate illustrated.
Michaela Schuster’s vocal performance as Herodias was impressive,
but the production again rather worked against her. Amongst the
gratuitous ‘horrors’, she was presented for the most part as
nothing more grotesque than a housewife. Mention should also go to
Joseph Kaiser, noble of utterance and beautiful of tone in the
role of Narraboth. The utter indifference to his suicide – perhaps
most shockingly from the holy man himself – was a nice touch from
the production. Greater, more focused concentration on harrowing
moments such as this would have paid dividends.
If I have uncharacteristically dealt more with the production than
with the musical performance, then this is at least partly a
consequence of the rather overwhelming nature of the stage
business. In that sense, I am reminded of last year’s
Salzburg
Benvenuto Cellini. Less is often more, as directors of
all persuasions should remind themselves. It takes a Harry Kupfer,
as for instance in his superb Berlin
Salome,
to show that more can occasionally be more too.
Mark Berry
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page