Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN AND HEARD CONCERT REVIEW
Elgar, Walton and Vaughan Wiliams:
Guy Johnston (cello), Royal Philharmonic Orchestra, Paul Daniel
Cadogan Hall, London, 13.5.2008 (BBr)
Edward Elgar:
Serenade for strings in E minor, op.20 (1892)
William Walton:
Cello Concerto (1956)
Ralph Vaughan Williams:
Symphony No.4 in F minor (1934)
Due to a fall we were robbed of the presence of Vernon Handley on
the podium but Paul Daniel more than made up for that loss, starting
with a delightful Elgar Serenade; light and delicate, with
rich and warm middle textures and the violins really singing their
themes. The slow movement was especially beautiful, Daniel showing
us that this was an embryonic form of the great symphonic adagios
that Elgar was to write a decade later.
Walton’s Cello Concerto has never gained the popularity of
the Violin Concerto and it’s easy to see why. Quite apart
from the fact that there are fewer cellists than violinists on the
concert circuit, it is an autumnal work – odd this, in that in terms
of his age Walton was not that old when he wrote it – and is much
more relaxed than its more famous predecessor. Starting with a
medium paced movement, with a long flowing, and widely ranging first
theme, and filled with the delicate sonorities of vibraphone and
celesta, the music is impassioned with the emotion held in check.
The scherzo which follows has a similar sense of holding back, fast
music, to be sure, but without the hectic qualities of some of
Walton’s scherzi. The finale is a set of four “improvisations” on a
theme and herein lies the stumbling block of the composition. The
second and fourth sections are for the cello alone – the first fast
and leading into a more typical Walton scherzo, the second slow and
lyrical and bringing the work full circle with a return of the
opening music and a peaceful conclusion. My feeling is that both
these “improvisations” are too long, and although I know that, for
the sake of musical balance, they have to be the durations they are,
I wish Walton had, for once, ignored that balance and been a little
more succinct, creating a shock in the listener with the
asymmetrical shape it would have given the music.
Guy Johnston is a fine cellist and a superb advocate for this music.
His virtuosity impressed but it was his handling of the lyrical
music, and this Concerto is full of that, which was most
enjoyable. He gave himself time to enjoy the themes and allowed them
to breathe. His phrasing of the long opening theme was glorious and
his handling of the end of the first movement, quite Don
Quixote-like in its resignation, was stunning. The scherzo was
quicksilver light, but try as he might the finale didn’t hold
together, but this was no fault of any of the performers who gave of
their all. Johnston is an exceptional talent who will go far in his
career.
“I don’t know if I like it, but it’s what I meant” is how Vaughan
Williams described his 4th Symphony, and after the
interval Daniel and the RPO gave us a powerhouse performance of this
difficult and disturbing work, making it sound even more like an
intimation of the coming war which the composer claimed it wasn’t!
Choosing brisk, but not hurried, tempi Daniel never allowed the
tension to drop for one second; this is tersely argued stuff and
there is no respite, even in the lyrical moments; think of the
second subject of the first movement which, although ostensibly
lyrical, is full of wild rushes and is wide in its range, played
against a disturbed background of repeated, seemingly disjointed
chords. In the development section of the first movement Daniel,
quite rightly, pushed things forward, martial music to the fore,
hard hitting, troubled and very disturbing; the quiet coda finally
bringing our demons to rest, but only for a moment. The slow
movement was well paced but was full of foreboding, our demons were
at work again. The scherzo was frenetic, forceful, and the
galumphing, fugal, trio, starting with tuba and double bassoon, had
no feeling of the playful bucolic, it was yet another assault on our
senses. The finale continues the argument, full of angst, and, as
before, even the lyrical and playful moments are full of
presentiment. There is an ominous quality to this music and when the
opening music re-appears at the very end we feel no sense of
homecoming, just a feeling that we’re “for it again”, as our dad
would tell us when we’d done something we shouldn’t have, and just
as we realise this VW snuffs out the music with a loud thump for
full orchestra.
Throughout, Daniel’s interpretations were most intelligent, and the
Royal Philharmonic responded with their very best playing. On a
couple of occasions there was some muddiness in the sound but this
couldn’t be helped for the scoring is big and thick and I have the
feeling that because the Cadogan Hall stage isn’t as large as some,
and without the trombones and tuba being on risers their important
contribution was sometimes not heard to the full.
This is the third of the Green and Pleasant Land series given
in the Cadogan Hall and all of them were the most perfect examples
of just how strong our own music is and how important it is in the
world music scene. Almost full houses on each occasion also
confirmed that the public enjoy, and more importantly, want this
music. With performances of such truthfulness it is to be hoped that
more fans have been won over to English music.
Bob Briggs
Back to Top Cumulative Index Page