Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD INTERNATIONAL RECITAL REVIEW
Bach and Rachmaninoff: Jeremy
Denk and Adam Neiman, pianos, Illsley Ball Nordstrom Recital Hall,
Benaroya Hall,
Seattle 26.1.2008 (BJ)
Jeremy Denk is one of the finest young pianists now before the
public, I have on several occasions enjoyed his brilliant and
sensitive playing, and he has also shown himself, in the musings
on his web site and blog, to be a highly intelligent thinker about
music and other subjects. Adam Neiman, too, has impressed me
before now in performances during the Seattle Chamber Music
Society’s summer festivals. So the prospect of hearing Denk play
Bach’s “Goldberg” Variations, and then team up with Neiman for the
original two-piano version of Rachmaninoff’s Symphonic Dances, was
enticing. This, surely, was going to be one of the highlights of
the winter season.
In the event, much of what we heard was indeed splendid. Denk’s
Bach had all the rhythmic incisiveness and burnished tone I have
enjoyed in his past work. The Rachmaninoff showcased both pianists
in commanding vein, producing massive fortissimos that yet avoided
harshness, and responding each to the other’s nuances of
expression with evident sympathy and remarkable precision. And
yet, in both works, it seemed to me that something was amiss.
This “Goldberg” reminded me of an experience I had more than40
years ago, listening to Pierre Boulez conduct Beethoven’s Ninth
Symphony in London: at a certain point in the first movement back
then, I found myself wondering when we were going to get to that
apocalyptic moment that opens the recapitulation–and realized that
it had already happened, and that I hadn’t even noticed it, which
must in a negative sense be accounted a considerable conductorial
achievement. On this occasion, similarly, Denk might just as well
not have played the sublime Adagio 25th variation for all the
emotional effect it made. Nor is that my only complaint. Denk’s
decisions regarding the inclusion or omission of repeats had a
disastrously arbitrary effect in a work that largely depends for
its impact on the artistry that the player brings to bear on the
embellishment of repeats, but that was not much in evidence in
this performance. And though I ought perhaps not to be bothered
by such considerations, the pianist indulged throughout in an
extraordinary repertoire of nodding and jerking head-movements
that I have never observed in his playing before, making it very
hard to concentrate on the music.
The Symphonic Dances, whether played on two pianos or in the
orchestral version that Rachmaninoff soon made of it, is one of
the composer’s greatest works, and it made a strong impression
under Neiman’s and Denk’s hands. But there was again a physical
oddity, for they had chosen the strangest stage set-up I have ever
seen in a two-piano performance. Instead of facing each other,
with one piano behind the other, they sat side by side, with the
two pianos angled at roughly 45 degrees toward the back of the
platform. Maybe they felt they could secure better ensemble that
way, and I had certainly no complaint in that regard. But the
effect was incommunicative in the extreme, since both pianists
were facing away from the audience, and many members of the
audience in turn could see them only with difficulty, especially
with a page-turner seated between Denk and the public. Before they
play the piece again, I would urge them to think hard about this.
They are both far too good musicians to saddle themselves with
such circumstantial distractions.
Bernard Jacobson