Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD INTERNATIONAL CONCERT REVIEW
Berio and Brahms:
Synergy Vocals, Steven Stucky (host), New York Philharmonic, Lorin
Maazel (conductor), Avery Fisher Hall, New York, 25.1.2008 (BH)
Berio:
Sinfonia for Eight Voices and Orchestra (1968-69)
Brahms:
Symphony No. 4 in E minor, Op. 98 (1884-85)
One of the most stunning moments in this concert occurred before
the performance even began, when composer Steven Stucky asked the
eight members of Synergy Vocals (sitting onstage among the
orchestra’s chairs) to replicate some of the sounds Berio requires
in Sinfonia. First they intoned the rock-solid opening
chords, followed by the eerily precise phonating the syllables of
"o king," whose syllables are based on Martin Luther King's name.
To close, they let fly some portions of the chaotic, Beckett-laced
fervor that runs through the central third section. To say that
the demonstration increased anticipation for the actual concert is
an understatement.
The orchestra had not performed Berio's seminal work since 1988,
when Pierre Boulez returned to conduct it with the Swingle
Singers. To my ears this concert was one of the best evenings
I’ve heard from conductor Lorin Maazel since he began in 2002.
The short first section, untitled, uses Claude Lévi-Strauss text,
against an orchestral texture that becomes more frenetic as it
progresses, helped by the Philharmonic's furious accuracy. The
crystalline Synergy Vocals palette made "o king" leap off the
page, but ultimately the piece lives or dies on its center, an
enormous maelstrom which takes the middle movement of Mahler's
Second Symphony and mixes it with shards of Beckett's The
Unnameable, swirled with Ravel, Schoenberg, Berlioz,
Stravinsky and Beethoven, among others. Its constantly pulsating
surface constantly teases the ear, playing tiny magic tricks with
the brain, the context shifting with each overloaded measure.
The fourth section returns to the quietude of the second, the
voices whispering, half-heard fragments fluttering above a
monolithic orchestra, before the fifth attempts to bring together
moments from the previous four. Conducting with keen attention to
the score, Maazel could not have been more involved, and the
surfeit of details was probably an ideal match for his restless
mind. The exultant orchestra combined Berio's precision with the
fever of the 1960s, the percussion section in exacting form. As
Maazel's arms came to rest at the conclusion, the only slight
disappointment was the subdued audience, who barely brought out
the conductor three times. I wanted to shout to the rafters.
The Brahms Fourth Symphony, good as it was, seemed almost an
afterthought following this incandescent display. The vigorous
first movement had blood, but seemed slightly on auto-pilot. The
handsomely played second was minus a certain magic, although the
horns had no end of lovingly shaped phrases, and Maazel invested
the ensemble with suitable weight. Best was the third: fire,
brimstone and a throaty sound, which paused only briefly before
the high-testosterone final movement. But despite the solid
musicianship from the orchestra, the moment had passed.
As time goes on, I'm more and more convinced that Maazel’s
formidable intellect and musicianship require equivalent scores to
keep him stimulated and at the top of his (considerable) game.
Whether in Carter's Variations for Orchestra last year, or Ives's
Three Places in New England in 2004, I wish he would do
more of this kind of repertoire, both for his happiness and ours.
Bruce Hodges
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page