Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD CONCERT REVIEW
"Gergiev's
Mahler", Sibelius and Schoenberg :
Leonidas Kavakos (violin), Laura
Claycomb (soprano) Valery Gergiev (Conductor) London Symphony
Orchestra, Barbican Hall, London, 12. 1.2008 and 13.1.2008 (AO)
Anne Ozorio
Sibelius, Violin Concerto
Mahler, Symphony 4
Schoenberg, Pelleas und Melisande
Mahler, Symphony 1
Mahler’s symphonies are so integrated as a group that it’s
important to understand them as a whole as well as individually.
This Barbican series is a rare chance for one conductor to create
a real “cycle”, with one orchestra, and in a short time span,
revealing how the symphonies relate as a trajectory. Certain
symphonies, however, stand out as tests, taking the measure of the
conductor’s concept. Very loosely speaking indeed, the 2nd
, 3rd, 4th and 8th reveal more
about how a conductor grasps Mahler’s inner ideas, while the 1st,
5th and 6th don’t quite need the same
approach.
That’s why hearing the 4th and the 1st
Symphony together makes sense. Gergiev’s performances this weekend
provided “proof of concept” for they were so dramatically
different. If one can speculate at all about the series,
Gergiev’s Mahler veers most definitely away from the sensitivities
of the 4th towards a broad brush, flashy 1st.
Not that there’s anything wrong in that per se. Every
conductor reveals something of himself in the way he approaches
his work, and it doesn’t particularly bother me that "Gergiev’s
Mahler" is exactly that – Gergiev’s Mahler, highly idiosyncrasic
and unorthodox. The real issue is understanding why it diverges
so much from other performance ideas. It’s certainly not simply
because Gergiev is Russian or conducts opera. For one thing, there
are many good Russian Mahler conductors, such as Sanderling and
Barshai, with much the same background as Gergiev, whose
credentials as a symphonic conductor are well established.
The well judged performance of Sibelius’s Violin Concerto,
with the brilliant Leonidas Kavakos as soloist, augured well.
Gergiev integrated the orchestra so exactly with the violin part
that it revealed how sensitive he can be when he connects with
depth to what he conducts. However, Mahler’s 4th
Symphony came across almost like a run-through, so little
insight did it reveal of the symphony’s inner complexities. It
was as if Gergiev was inhibited by the quiet, contemplative
spirit, restraining himself to the extent that he missed the
underlying energy that pulls the symphony forward to its ecstatic
conclusion. Clues abound right from the start, but this approach
seemed to skim the surface, without tapping the hidden tensions.
I’d really hoped Gergiev would make more of the Freund Hein
motifs, and the darkness in the third movement, but the emphasis
here was non-committal, episodic rather than integrated into a
deeper exploration of how the symphony works. A lost opportunity
then, but I’ll credit Gergiev for trying something different.
No stillness, then, in the second concert the following day.
Schoenberg’s Pelleas und Melisande condenses the long story
into a concise symphonic poem. It’s really nothing like Debussy,
but the basic elements are totally not dissimilar – images of
water, innocence, violence, barbarity and richness interact. In
this performance, Golo clumps about all over, while Melisande
cowers in the sidelines. Gergiev made so much of the brass and
percussion that the winds and strings didn’t stand much chance.
An astute friend jokes that Gergiev has three default
settings, loud, very loud and VERY LOUD. Of course that´s not
strictly true as he can do quiet when he wants to, but this
performance of Mahler´s 1st Symphony would certainly stressed
volume above subtlety. Of course it was exciting on a visceral,
rollicking level. The audience was ecstatic, wildly applauding at
the end. This is the one symphony where Gergiev´s extreme, one
dimensional interpretation might work, because Mahler´s
protagonist is a brash fellow, full of himself, out to conquer the
world. But there´s so much more. Recently Neeme Järvi - an
Estonian born in the former USSR - conducted a warm, self
deprecating version, making the most of the irony in the music.
Gergiev did observe the vernal aspects ij the score, but again,
they were incidents, rather than integrated into an overall
conception. The real weakness wasn´t the performance so much as
the way it didn´t seem to exist as part of a cycle. Of course it
should be heard on its own terms, but because this is part of a
series, it needs to relate to an overall appreciation of the
group.
The series isn´t called "Gergiev´s Mahler" for nothing as Gergiev
takes a very individualistic approach to Mahler and why not ? He
can´t pretend to be anything he is not: better then, that he
should create off the wall, oddball interpretations that thrill at
least some sections of the audience. But it is a one-dimensional
approach, which ignores the complexities that characterise the
composer´s essence. It´s fine for the first-time listener,
but it´s superficial, ultimately unsatisfying for anyone
expecting more. My main concern is that listeners may become
habituated to brash, superficial Mahler because it does excite on
a basic, primitive level.
I was delighted when the LSO chose Gergiev and Harding as
conductors because they are complete opposites. Harding´s Mahler
is more attuned to the current European approach to Mahler that
Abbado and Boulez and others represent. Musically intelligent
and perceptive as Harding was, his performances didn´t go down
too well with audiences at the time, perhaps because they were so
different from the usual fare people are used to. It takes time
to appreciate something genuinely different. After hearing
Gergiev, maybe audiences might have more appreciation of
just how much more there still is to learn about Mahler.
BBC Radio 3 will broadcast this series on consecutive nights from
28th January in the order : 1st, 3rd,
4th and 6th. The broadcasts will be part of
the Performance on Three programmes, which usually remain
available for listening online for a week.
Full details of the
BBC broadcasts can be found
here.