Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN AND HEARD RECITAL REVIEW
Schubert,
Mozart, and Bach:
David Fray
(piano). Wigmore Hall, London. 8.5.2008 (MB)
Schubert – Impromptu in C minor, D 899 no.1
Schubert – Impromptu in G flat major, D 899 no.3
Mozart – Piano Sonata in B flat major, KV 333/315c
Mozart – Adagio in B minor, KV 540
Bach – Partita no.6 in E minor, BWV 830
The audience at this Wigmore Hall recital was disappointingly small,
despite the recent release of David Fray’s widely-lauded first disc
for Virgin Classics. Perhaps this is a case of a record company –
and record collectors – being more discriminating than concert
audiences, for Fray, on the evidence of this recital alone, is a
very important pianist. He does not need to be treated as
‘promising’; he is a fully-fledged musician. This is not to say that
everything was performed at an equal level, but where I am more
critical, namely in the performance of the Mozart piano sonata, this
is more a reflection on the very high quality of the rest of the
performance than upon any serious failings.
Clichés concerning French musicians, not least pianists, die hard,
but the only thing Gallic about Fray’s performance was his
appearance. Indeed, if one closed one’s eyes during the two Schubert
impromptus, one might have guessed at least ‘school of’ Wilhelm
Kempff. In his programme notes, Jonathan Burton likened the C minor
Impromptu to ‘taking the tune for a walk,’ which was just how it
sounded here. Fray’s alertness to harmonic motion ensured that we
were in safe hands with regard to the walk’s direction, whatever its
diverting twists and turns. Voice-leading was excellent, though
never in a self-consciously ‘individual’ way. The Erlkönig-triplets
were ominous but never melodramatic; this was an impromptu,
not an aspirant sonata movement. And the way in which the music died
away – an especial strength of Fray’s performances throughout the
recital – was truly magical, testament to his powers of touch and
phrasing. The G flat major piece rightly stood closer to Mendelssohn
than to Bellini; if vocal this were, then it was a song without
words, not an aria. It was again a performance driven by a profound
understanding of the work’s harmonic sense. Schenker – and indeed
Furtwängler – would have approved. The darker undertones were well
judged: neither too little nor too much. Again, the music subsided
into nothingness, the only Gallic concession being the shrug at the
end.
Mozart’s sonata in B flat, KV 333/315c was the only work
concerning whose performance I had reservations. The opening
Allegro was taken at quite a speed. Though not really
hard-driven, I did think that it could profitably have been taken
down a notch, and that Fray might have yielded a little more to
Mozart’s lyricism. In this respect, the second subject was moulded
to better effect during the exposition repeat and the recapitulation
than it had been upon its initial presentation. The ineffably
operatic vocal leaps first heard at the end of the exposition would
have benefited from more tender shaping. Moreover, the dynamic range
was somewhat restricted throughout: Fray proved himself excellent at
differentiating between a wide range of piano playing, but
never rose to a true forte. His varied articulation, however,
was excellent. The Andante cantabile was certainly a modern
reading in terms of its flowing tempo, but ultimately it sounded
ever so slightly impatient. Admittedly, the exposition sounded more
relaxed the second time round, so this was not simply a matter for
the metronome. The concerto finale, marked Allegretto grazioso,
was not excessively fast, but again I felt that a slightly more
measured pace would have been preferable, not least when we reached
the coda, whose figuration, whilst perfectly delivered in technical
terms, suggested that a slower basic tempo might have been
beneficial. This movement sounded louder on the whole, sometimes to
good effect, as in the ‘orchestral’ lead-up to the cadenza, although
I missed the shades of piano evident during the first two
movements. The cadenza certainly sounded as a cadenza should.
After the interval, Fray remained with Mozart, for the miraculous
Adagio in B minor, KV 540. Here, from the word go, there were
greater dynamic contrasts, indicating a greater willingness to
employ more or less the full resources of the modern piano.
Imitating the fortepiano merely reduces the music, and I fancy there
was a little of this to the sonata performance. Having said that,
there is the undeniable fact that to perform Mozart well is the most
difficult of all musical tasks, so one should not be too harsh; I
have heard far, far worse. At any rate, we were treated – in every
sense – not only to a true forte, but even sparingly to a
true fortissimo, albeit always at the service of the music.
Great care was taken with the voicing of the semiquaver chords,
enabling their rhythmic and harmonic momentum fully to register. And
there was an undeniable sense of fatal progression, always leading
to the desolation of the coda and the final consoling warmth of B
major.
If the Mozart Adagio was excellent, then the Bach partita received a
performance for which the word ‘great’ is not an exaggeration. There
was no sense whatsoever here of fearing to use the modern instrument
to the full; it is interesting, though regrettable, that pianists
nowadays often sound more circumscribed in Mozart than in Bach.
Indeed, it was absolutely clear from this performance that, for
those for whom Bach is more – so much more – than merely decorative,
generically Baroque, the continuously developing life-force of his
music will always demand the piano. As Ernst Bloch put it,
‘the harpsichord’s sharp, short sound fulfils not a single one of
Bach’s requirements. … there can be no doubt that only our own
pianos, the incomparable Steinways that were born for the modern
Bach, clear, booming, edged with silver, have revealed how the
master should now be played.’
The Toccata began with a splendid sense of freedom, both
rhythmic and dynamic, to the opening flourishes. There was an
excellent sense of the counterpoint developing therefrom, rather
than providing a mere contrast. Every note counted, both in itself
and for where it was going. Here, the tempi sounded ‘right’
without fail; there was no sense whatsoever of being hurried. Finely
modulated dynamic contrasts added to the great cumulative build up
to the reprise of the earlier, freer music. This return sounded duly
inevitable, yet the sense of transformation was truly magical. The
Allemande brought a good sense of Bachian ambiguity between
the melodic and the chordal in its arpeggio figuration. Intricacy,
expressive rather than decorative, was the key to the almost
Wagnerian sense of ‘unending melody’. The Corrente was nicely
contrasted, sounding a more boisterous mood from the outset. There
was a real sense of the corrente dance truly running, though
running meaningfully, for there was real depth to the projection of
the music’s chromatic twists. In the Air, an especial joy was
the subtle contrasting of the presentation of the theme, allied once
again to a supreme sense of line and unendliche Melodie. The
beauty of the Sarabande’s broken chords showed what only the
piano could do, yet these were not merely ‘colourful’. Indeed, there
was a presentiment of Boulezian proliferation – Fray’s disc for
Virgin combined Bach and Boulez – as the dialectic between harmony
and melody worked itself out. Likewise, the ornaments were truly
melodic, which had not always been the case in the Mozart sonata.
There could be no doubt that this movement formed the still heart to
the partita. Fray boldly projected the Gigue’s
counterpoint. From the opening bar, it was sharply defined
rhythmically, and showed how one can have drive without ever tending
towards the hard-driven. Bach’s extreme chromaticism brings us close
to Berg, an aspect Fray clearly relished. Moreover, the expressive
potential of the intervallic relationships, especially in the
wedge-like opening out of the themes, was frankly Webernian, to an
extent I cannot recall hearing previously. At the end, one
appreciated that Fray had conceived the performance as a whole, and
had triumphantly succeeded. It only remained for the poet to speak
in the magical Schumann encore with which Fray concluded his
distinguished recital.
Mark Berry