Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN AND HEARD RECITAL REVIEW
Shostakovich, Britten, Bridge and Elgar:
Natalie Clein (cello), Kathryn Stott (piano).
Cadogan
Hall London 2.5.2008 (MMB)
Shostackovich– Sonata in D minor for cello and piano, Op. 40
(1934)
Britten – Third Suite for Cello, Op. 87 (1971)
Frank Bridge – Cello Sonata in D minor (1913-17)
Elgar – Salut d’Amour, Op. 12 (1888), In Moonlight (1904)
arranged by Julian Milone, La Capricieuse, Op. 17 (1891) arranged by
Natalie Clein
This was the programme advertised before the recital, and listed in
the concert brochure. After the Shostakovich piece however, Ms Clein
announced she was going to play Bridge’s sonata first and Britten’s
suite after the interval. Once she completed the Britten however, as
she returned on stage to play the three different pieces by Elgar which
were supposed to close the programme, she announced a bigger change.
She played an extra - Ástor Piazzola's “Grand Tango”. This was then
followed by only one Elgar piece instead of the three listed,
the beautiful and very popular “Salut d’Amour”, which the composer
dedicated to his wife. The reasons for the change were not quite
clear and it appeared to me that some people in the audience were
slightly disappointed for being deprived of two short but pretty
Elgar works.
This recital was part of Cadogan Hall’s Celebrity Recital Series and
entitled Friends and Inspiration. Natalie Clein gave a
pleasant, interesting introduction when she first came on stage,
explaining the reasons for the title and the link to the programme
choices. The principal link was the great Russian cellist and
conductor Mstislav Rostropovich who died a year ago almost to the
day. He was a friend of Shostakovich though twenty years his junior
and also later became friends with Britten. Both composers, who were
also friends, were inspired by Rostropovich's playing and wrote
pieces specifically for him, designed to show off his unique
virtuosity and sensitive delicate interpretations. To illustrate
the 'inspiration' topic further, Ms Clein added that she too had often
been inspired by Rostropovich’s recordings of the same pieces.
Natalie Clein’s introductions were a particularly nice touch to this
recital, making it more personal and intimate. She not only
explained the title of the concert and the reasons for the programme
choices; she also introduced each piece in an informative way,
interacting with the audience in a simple, unassuming and friendly
manner, which to my mind enhanced her audience’s experience of the
works played.
Interestingly enough, Natalie Clein began her recital with
Shostakovich’s Sonata in D minor for cello and piano, which
was written before the composer met Rostropovich. While not
dedicated to him, it certainly sounds as though it could have
been, such is the combination of virtuosic lyricism and
passion that it requires. It is a striking piece with great
emotional impact, composed just a couple years before Shostakovich
incurred Stalin’s wrath and hinting that the composer had already begun
searching for a new, simplified musical language even before
being forced to do so to save his career. The Sonata has
four movements and some passages seem reminiscent of both
Tchaikovsky - the lyrical second theme in the first movement,
Allegro non troppo – Largo, or even of Beethoven in the dark
mood of the 3rd movement Largo. To my mind, Ms
Clein’s performance was near perfection: emotion pours out of
her; she treats every note with equal care, extracting a warm,
crystal clear tone from her cello, particularly during the most
lyrical passages, which she phrases in a smooth, delicate legato.
Her playing gives the instrument a quality of the human
voice which is much more apparent than usually and her virtuosity is
also undeniable, particularly during the finale which she
delivers in an astonishing display of dexterity and emotional power
sufficient literally take one’s breath away. At the piano, Kathryn
Stott matched Clein’s gentleness note for note and during the
finale her playing was equally as virtuosic as her partner's.
Shostakovich was followed by Frank Bridge’s Cello Sonata also
in D Minor. The sonata begins with a passionate poetic first
movement, expressing much energy and emotion. Ms Clein’s
interpretation was suitably romantic and lyrical during this passage
but she successfully changed into the dark, sombre mood required
for the second and final movement. Bridge originally planned to
write a more conventional sonata in four movements when he began the
work in 1913, but by the time he finished it in 1917, his
world view had changed, greatly influenced by the First
World War. After the “classical” first movement, the
remaining movements were condensed into a single expression of the
darkness of the time. The lamenting sounds that Natalie Clein drew
from the cello, felt almost as if the instrument was telling
the audience how much it needed them because of its lonely
desperation.
Continuing the friendship by following the Bridge sonata with a work
by his pupil Britten, after the interval Ms Clein played
Britten’s Third Suite for Cello, one of three that he
composed specifically for Rostropovich. This is a technically
demanding piece, extremely difficult to play and anyone who heard
Rostropovich perform would instantly understand why the piece was
meant for him: the work's Russian tunes and Rostropovich'
legendary virtuosity are integral to the dedication. This is not a piece that I particularly enjoy
myself, and
although I recognise its technical difficulties, it always leaves me
indifferent to its content. Even Ms Clein’s wonderfully expressive
performance failed to change my opinion despite her ability to
demonstrate many of the qualities of Rostropovich’s own
playing ; she is subtle and restrained in her virtuosity however,
making the interpretation her own rather than mere imitation.
At this point, the audience was ready for Elgar’s pretty
melodies but what they heard instead was Piazzolla, the “Grand
Tango” arranged, as I understood it, once again by
Britten for Rostropovich. Actually, this is a very interesting
piece. It is a lively, passionate tango with an unmistakably
Argentinian sound. Ms Clein and Ms Stott delivered it with
undeniable Latin flair, expressing all of the tango's
excitement and passion. It deservedly got one of the
biggest cheers of the evening. Finally, with the eagerly awaited
Elgar, Natalie Clein produced a beautiful and
heart-warming “Salut d’Amour” which almost inevitably was rewarded
with the greatest applause. She and Stott then returned for an
encore, another tango by Piazzolla, entitled “Milonga”. While
, lacking the passion of the “Grand Tango” this was also
musically very interesting and both cellist and pianist
executed it brilliantly, rounding off a fine evening of
music making.
Margarida Mota-Bull
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page