Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN AND HEARD CONCERT REVIEW
Stravinsky and Dvořák:
Pieter Wispelwey (cello). Budapest Festival Orchestra, Iván Fischer
(conductor), Royal Festival Hall, London. 6.6.2008 (MMB)
Stravinsky – Concerto in E flat for chamber orchestra
‘Dumbarton Oaks’ (1938), The Firebird Suite (1919)
Dvořák – Cello Concerto in B minor Op. 104 (1894-95),
Legend in B flat Op. 59 No. 10 arr. for orchestra (1880), Nocturne
in B for strings Op. 40 (1875), Slavonic Dance in A major Op. 46 No.
5 (1878)
Iván Fischer is a dynamic, innovative conductor and the soul of the
Budapest Festival Orchestra. He founded the orchestra in 1983
because he wanted to do something different, believing passionately
that the entire musical system needed a profound shake-up. In his
own words: ‘I felt that orchestral musicians didn’t see themselves
as artists, but as having a job.’[1]
So, once he had his own orchestra assembled, Fischer introduced new,
intensive rehearsal methods and an emphasis on creative work for
each musician in the orchestra. Fischer started new concert formats,
like special concerts for children, public concerts where he talked
about the compositions, and so-called “secret concerts” without an
announced programme. The orchestra works strictly 30 weeks per year,
as Fischer believes that more would make the players (and perhaps
audiences) switch off and, to stimulate creativity, he has
devised an annual competition from within the orchestra to give the
musicians soloist opportunities. Whether one agrees with Fischer’s
radical approach to running an orchestra or not, one must concede
that he is definitely doing something right. Twenty-five years after
its creation, the Budapest Festival Orchestra is one of the finest
in the world; a serious case of popularity, performing to packed
houses, both at home and abroad, and displaying a brilliance that
one does not see very often. Players enjoy an intimate artistic and
reciprocated relationship with Fischer which most ensembles and
conductors can only dream about. This concert at the Royal Festival
Hall lived entirely up to expectations.
Stravinsky’s famous “Dumbarton Oaks” concerto for chamber orchestra
was commissioned by a wealthy American, Mr and Mrs Robert
Woods Bliss in 1937 in celebration of their 30th wedding
anniversary in 1938. The name Dumbarton Oaks was that of their
estate in Washington D.C.. The piece was innovative, composed during
Stravinsky’s neo-Classic period, a time when the composer was
experimenting with forms of western musical tradition. To my mind,
the “Dumbarton Oaks” concerto is a musical essay on composing in the
Baroque style, using a modern harmonic, rhythmic and melodic
language, and deliberately invoking J. S. Bach’s Brandenburg
Concertos. Fischer’s rendition with 15 Budapest
Festival Orchestra players was simultaneously exuberant, energetic
and delightful.
Preparing to perform Dvořák’s magnificent Cello Concerto in B minor,
the Dutch cellist Pieter Wispelwey made an interesting, unusual
entrance in the sense that he was in shirt sleeves and a
bright golden waistcoat, heavily contrasting his appearance with the
orchestra and conductor, all in formal black and, in the case of the
men, tails and bow tie. He reminded me of a working man ready to
open his tool box and start the job, and I mean this as a
compliment. Concerts often suffer from too much formality and
therefore this made for a refreshing, welcoming start. Refreshing
was also the word for Wispelwey’s and Fischer’s approach to the
concerto, each handling it with sobriety and sustained intensity and
never allowing it to become over-sentimental. Although the
concerto’s solo part is demanding, Dvořák did not intend it as a
vehicle for virtuosity but instead aimed for orchestra and soloist
to form an integrated whole.
It is fair to say that Wispelwey, Fischer and the BFO
achieved the composer's intentions to a degree reaching near
perfection, most obviously during the masterful, lyrically intense
first movement Allegro. Orchestra and soloist exchanged the
two main themes in a truly harmonious conversation, displaying a
brilliant understanding of the composer’s ideas. The slower second
movement, Adagio ma non troppo, is possibly the concerto's
most poignant section, opening with a painfully beautiful clarinet
solo. While Wispelwey’s execution was certainly effective here,
but I could not help longing for the spontaneous, delicate
sensitivity of the legendary Mstislav Rostropovich (who sadly passed
away in April 2007), wonderfully captured in his memorable 1969
recording with Karajan and the Berliner Philarmoniker.
Wispelwey’s reading was moving and lyrical but perhaps lacked the
purity and crystalline clarity of sound that Rostropovich managed to
extract from the cello, particularly during this second movement. In
the third and final movement however, Wispelwey was back in his
element and his performance was ravishing and fluid, and even though
he was perspiring copiously he still managed to look cool and
assured, sending Fischer and the BFO into the rousing finale
and
bringing out a loud, well deserved roar of applause for both himself
and the orchestra at the end.
After the interval, Iván Fischer and the BFO truly came into their
own with four different pieces for the full orchestra, enabling them
to
showcase their brilliance, creativity and glorious sound. It was
obvious that a great deal of thought went into devising the best,
most effective placement of instruments to obtain the
best possible sound and Fischer did not shy away from making minor
adjustments, depending on the piece to be played. He
favoured a very symmetrical, antiphonal orchestra layout throughout
the evening, in both halves of the concert, and he was proven
completely correct. The BFO sound was fabulous, clear and precise without ever
becoming dry.
The second half of
the evening began with three fine, little gems by Dvořák,
respectively Legend in B flat No, 10, arranged for orchestra from
the original piano duet, the Nocturne in B for strings
and Slavonic Dance in A major No. 5. The performance of each piece
was excellent and beautiful, displaying their differences and
variety most effectively. I particularly loved the interpretation of the
Legend in B flat, which was extraordinarily evocative, echoing
childhood memories of deep forests, inhabited by fairy tale
creatures. The Nocturne was suitably hushed and lyrical and the
Slavonic Dance masterfully energetic and vibrant.
The concert
closed, as it opened, with a piece by Stravinsky. In this case the
suite No. 2 from his great ballet score The Firebird, graphical music
in which Fischer and the BFO really excelled,
giving it its full character, depicting the various changes in mood
brilliantly, from the mysterious to the magical, from the dark to
the luminous,
particularly during the dance of the firebird, the lullaby and
the glorious finale. The response of the audience at the RFH was
understandably one of enthusiastic, roaring applause and demands for
many curtain calls. In typical style, asked the audience what they would like to hear
as an encore. The reply
was deafening and the only clear request was for another great Stravinsky
masterpiece The Rite of Spring, which brought more than a few smiles on
the musicians’ faces but was never going to happen. After a
brief discussion with his first violin, Iván Fischer opted for
another Slavonic Dance by Dvořák, this time the seventh. It was the
right closure to an evening of great music.
Iván Fischer must
be very proud of his orcheatra and their combined achievements. The relationship
between the player and the conductor is obviously one mutual respect and understanding, possibly
even love. Mixed in with suberb talent this is the secret of their success.
Margarida
Mota-Bull
Back to Top Cumulative Index Page