Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD RECITAL REVIEW
Schubert and Beethoven:
Belcea Quartet (Corina Belcea-Fisher (violin), Laura Samuel
(violin), Krzysztof Chorzelski (viola), Antoine Lederlin (cello))
Wigmore Hall, London, 10.6.2008 (BBr)
Franz Schubert:
String Quartet in A minor, D804 (1824)
Ludwig van Beethoven:
String Quartet in C sharp minor, op.131 (1825/1826)
Only a few weeks ago I was knocked out by a performance by this
ensemble of Schubert’s Der Tod und das Madchen Quartet in
this very hall and this evening they turned their attention to the
quartet which immediately preceded it. A work of infinite
melancholy, the Quartet in A minor is the first of
Schubert’s works which exploit the heavenly length
(Schumann’s description of the 9th Symphony)
which was to dominate so many of his later compositions as he
wrote bigger and more powerful works on a very large scale.
The A minor Quartet is restrained almost to a fault. The
music seldom raises its voice, being happy in its contemplation of
the very means of music making. When it does increase in volume it
is seldom for more than a few moments, and those moments truly
disturb the forward momentum of the music. The lightness of
feeling of the second movement – commencing with a quote from
incidental music he had recently written for the play Rosamunde
– and the quasi gypsy dance of the finale give some respite, but,
in general, we are in a resigned mood throughout.
The Belcea Quartet understood Schubert’s state of mind at the time
of composition and gave a performance of muted and understated
understanding. Their approach was never forlorn for there was
always hope in their performance and the players kept everything
discreet, never raising their voices unless it was absolutely
essential to do so, and when they did we certainly knew about it.
This was Schubert playing of great understanding with love and
care lavished on every bar.
Beethoven’s late Quartets are amongst the pinnacles of the quartet
literature. It can sometimes be hard to understand the furore
caused by some of these works at their premières
as we have become inured to the dissonance or unusual forms used
because of everything which has happened in the intervening years.
However, if ever an early 19th century work still has
the power to shock, this quartet must be that work. Unlike
Schubert’s Quartet,Beethoven’s is big and passionate, questioning
and questing; Beethoven is opening new doors in his compositions,
seeking new goals. The opening fugue, an astonishing movement by
any standards, was played with consummate mastery by the quartet –
it’s hard to keep this slow music moving without losing the thread
of the argument – each strand of the discussion speaking firmly
and clearly so that the texture created by the counterpoint was
never muddied. The slow movement was likewise well handled,
emotions held in check as the music gradually unfolded. The finale
was wild and fiery; here the quartet really let go and it played
for all it was worth, bringing this most fascinating of works to a
thrilling conclusion.
What more can I say? I am seldom at a loss for words but with this
performance I really am quite speechless and simply cannot find
words which adequately describe what I heard. The music making was
of such an high order and the sustained concentration of the
players held the audience in thrall. The Belcea Quartet is, quite
simply, one of the best quartets working today and their
performances this evening were magnificent.
Bob Briggs
Back to Top Cumulative Index Page