Other Links
<Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD CONCERT REVIEW
Swansea Festival 2: Haydn, Bartok,
Beethoven
Allegri
Quartet: Ofer Falk, Rafael Todes (violin),Dorothea Vogel (violin),
Pat Banda (cello). Brangwyn Hall,
Swansea,
13.10.2007 (GPu)
Bartok
String Quartet No. 6
Beethoven
String Quartet in C, Op. 59 No.3
Glyn Pursglove
Haydn
String Quartet
in A, Op. 20 No.6
Not long ago I was rereading Robin Daniels’s Conversations with
Menuhin (1979). On my way home after this concert given by the
current, fairly youthful, incarnation of the Allegri Quartet (50
years old in 2004) a passage from the book was very much in my mind
and I got it off the shelves to check it:
“RD: Do you regard chamber music – and especially the string quartet
– as the highest form of musical activity?
YM: Yes, I do. The independence and interdependence of each line;
the subtlety of inflection and of the emotions expressed; the
restraint, the economy of instrumental resources – a quartet can
convey so much more than a huge orchestra with a battery of brass,
producing an ear-splitting volume of sound, each composer trying to
outdo the other in decibel strength …
RD: The glory of the string quartet is derived not only from its
compactness but from the number four being symbolic of wholeness.
YM: Yes. A string quartet covers more or less the range and
divisions of the human voice, male and female. It can express the
deepest and most sensitive of human emotions. It can speak of
eternal truths. … I am not decrying the great works written for
orchestra, but I am in no doubt that the string quartet, in which
each player has total responsibility for his part, is a more subtle
and evolved form of communication”.
The Allegri’s well-chosen and well-executed programme was a
delightful demonstration of many of the virtues adumbrated above –
wholeness, restraint, economy, reflection of the range of the human
voice, the deepest and most sensitive of human emotions.
Throughout the ensemble playing was impeccable, but without ever
feeling over-regimented as it can with some modern quartets. The
sense of conversation, of equal voices expressing their views on a
common theme or situation was everywhere apparent. The instrumental
balance was a joy in itself; but like everything else it existed to
serve the music not as a shiny-surfaced end in itself.
They began their programme with the last of Haydn’s six opus 20
quartets, originally published in 1774 as Six Divertimentos.
As that title may suggest, they owe much to the mannerisms of the
gallant style, but they fuse this with a weight of thought and
emotion which were increasingly to become the hallmarks of Haydn’s
quartets. In terms of Haydn’s development as a writer of string
quartets – which is to say in the development of the string quartet
per se – these opus 20 quartets are works of great
importance. The Allegri’s performance was properly lyrical, not
least in the extended aria of the adagio, in which grace was
complemented by hints of darker emotions. Throughout the Allegri
played with a delightful clarity of line and, without any sense of
forcing, their presentation of the contrasts between movements was
apt and telling. The third movement menuet and trio was particularly
lovely, the slow and almost fragmentary tentativeness of the opening
burgeoning with an air of great naturalness into lucid melody and
harmony. Perhaps the three-voiced fugue of the final allegro didn’t
quite succeed in fusing fugal correctness with the figures of a
quasi-peasant dance as the most outstanding performances of the
movement do, but that is only to quibble at what was a fine opening
to their programme.
Earlyish Haydn was followed by the very different world of Bartok’s
last quartet. Though it is a work whose meaning is in no way limited
by the circumstances of its composition, it is hard to forget that
it was written in the months of his mother’s final illness. Bartok’s
mother died in December 1939. The writing of the quartet began in
August 1939 and completed in November of that year. Of course,
Bartok had more than family distress to worry about at such a time.
With the rise of fascism in
Hungary, the
Bartoks planned to emigrate and left for
America
the following year, before any performance of the quartet could be
given in Hungary.
The
Allegri’s reading of the quartet was not as dramatic, not as wildly
expressive as some that I have heard. There was, rather, a marked
degree of restraint to their performance which elucidated Bartok’s
argument perfectly. The motto-theme of the quartet, marked mesto
(sad) is mournful, but dignified, soaked in the inflexions of Magyar
music but, at the same time, classically ‘correct’. Its first
statement by the viola of Dorothea Vogel was heart-rending in its
balance of the suffering and the stoic. When the theme begins the
second movement, its statement in a two-part counterpoint, voiced by
the cello and commented on by the higher strings showed the
Allegri’s ensemble work at its very best. When the “mesto” theme
returns at the beginning of the third movement there is a feeling of
inescapability about it. The bitter irony of the ‘march’ in the
second movement seems to have led only to a kind of comically
excessive gypsy-pathos; nor will the burletta of the third movement
do more than comment on the futility of struggle to escape sadness,
leading to a somewhat manic quality in the recognition of the
triviality of the offered alternatives. When, then, the “mesto”
motif returns at the beginning of the final movement, there is no
further attempt to run away from it, as it were. The three previous
movements carry, respectively, the designations “Mesto - Vivace”,
“Mesto - Marcia” and “Mesto – Burletta-moderato”; the final movement
is, with stark simplicity, marked just “Mesto”. The “mesto” motif
now becomes the generative stuff of the entire movement and there is
a degree of resignation (but no signs of self-pity) in its
acceptance and, indeed, in its elaboration. Moments of (pretend?)
happiness from the earlier vivace are recalled, but now subsumed in
the all-encompassing sense of poignancy. The Allegri’s quite
outstanding reading of the quartet resisted all temptation to
melodrama, even in the rather sinister tremelo chords on the last
page of the finale; instead they presented with enormous clarity, a
clarity that made it all the more moving, Bartok’s musical
argument, in a performance which had great innerness and, to repeat
a word used earlier, wholeness.
The Bartok, for me, was the highlight of the evening, but an assured
performance of the third of Beethoven’s Razumovsky quartets was also
richly enjoyable. The harmonically unexpected opening was played
with hushed tension, and even for listeners familiar with the music,
there was a quality both of release and of almost impudent surprise
when the allegro vivace burst out. The transition from near stasis
to gratifying fluidity was handled in delightful fashion. Having
just been listening to Bartok, the eastern European quality of some
of the music that makes up the second movement, a kind of idealised
archetype of folk melody, was particularly striking. If that was one
case of intertextuality evident in the Allegri’s well-designed
programme, another existed in the exuberant Fugal finale (actually a
blend of sonata and fugue) reminiscent of Haydn’s use of fugal
devices in the finale of the quartet which began the programme.
The Allegri’s Beethoven – and not only that – was played with an
absolute lucidity which never became merely clinical; that lucidity
is perhaps a function of the perfect instrumental balance they
achieved in this concert. I don’t think I have ever noticed before
just how superb the writing for viola is in Bartok’s sixth quartet.
That I did so on this occasion was not because Dorothea Vogel forced
herself disproportionately on the listener’s attention. Just the
opposite, in fact. It was the perfection of instrumental balance
that allowed one to hear all four voices with utter clarity.
When I hear a really good string quartet I am sometimes tempted
toward the heretical belief (implicit in some of Menuhin’s remarks
quoted earlier) that we might safely dispense with all those
orchestras and singers – that this is the only music we need. This
was one of those nights.