Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD CONCERT REVIEW
Richard Strauss, Till Eulenspiegel
Igor Stravinsky, Violin Concerto
Sergey Prokofiev, Romeo and Juliet, suite,
While it would be unfair to describe the performance of Till
Eulenspiegel which opened the concert as ‘routine’, it would
perhaps be reasonable to say that it was marked by high professional
competence than by any sense of compelling personal vision. It was
as good as one feels entitled to expect from an orchestra and a
conductor of this quality, but it didn’t have about it the air of
necessity. Changes of tempo and dynamics were purposefully and
precisely articulated as we were switched to and fro between
detailed close-ups and wide-screen effects, as it were. There have
been more boisterous Tills than this and some of his predecessors
have been more fully characterised.
So, for various reasons, neither opening nor closing work was on
quite the same level as the Stravinsky concerto performed between
them, though they each had some pleasures to offer. Baiba Skride’s
(and Fischer’s) reading of that concerto demonstrated its subtlety
of design, both in detail and larger shape. Its economy of means,
its relatively laconic way of proceeding made a vivid contrast with
the orchestral opulence on either side of it, and made a very
persuasive case for the proposition that less can be more. An
excellent pre-concert talk by Stephen Walsh, Professor of Music at
Cardiff University and author of the highly recommended
Stravinsky: A
Creative Spring 1882-1934
(1999)
and
Stravinsky: The Second Exile
(2006),
as well as
The New Grove
Stravinsky
(2002) added to one’s pleasure in what was very much the musical
centrepiece of this particular triptych.
Red Violin
Festival 2 :
Strauss, Stravinsky, Prokofiev
Baiba Skride (violin), BBC National Orchestra of Wales / Thierry
Fischer (conductor), St. David’s Hall, Cardiff, 4.02.2007 (GPu)
This was a well-designed musical triptych, with two opulently
orchestrated and expansive works flanking an altogether sparer
composition; two lavishly pictorial and programmatic works framing a
tightly argued piece of abstract music.
In a very fine performance of Stravinky’s Violin concerto the
soloist was the young Latvian Baiba Skride. Her recordings of works
by Mozart, Schubert and Haydn (see
review) and concertos by Shostakovich and Janacek (see
review) have, quite properly, attracted a good deal of
favourable attention – the Shostakovich-Janacek recording was chosen
as a disc of the month in these pages. She is indeed a considerable
violinist. She has, as one has come to expect these days, great
technical command; but more than that she has imagination and subtle
musicianship. She is not – on the evidence of this concert – a
flashy or showy player; there were no self-foregrounding
histrionics, no mere flamboyance. Rather, her work was characterised
by the seriousness (in the best sense) of her approach and by her
obvious, and communicated, pleasure in what she was doing. She
showed an equal alertness to both the wit and the lyricism of
Stravinsky’s writing in the concerto, handling both with agility and
delicacy. In the opening Toccata she voiced Stravinsky’s music with
energy and brightness of tone; the dialogue of soloist and orchestra
had real wit and verve, a humour by turns dry and relatively broad.
The echoes of, allusions to, the musical language of the Baroque
were clear but not overemphasised. The music is diverse and
episodic, but this was a performance which – thanks to both soloist
and conductor – located unifying patterns and had the momentum to
ensure that everything held together in the far from simple
trajectory from the dissonant chord (which opens each movement) to
the consonance which closed the Toccata in an air of only slightly
ironised triumph. In the second movement (Aria I) the darker central
passage was played with such real intensity that the change of mood
in the closing moments of the movement had genuine force. The third
movement (Aria II) is a miniature masterpiece, as near to
‘Romanticism’ as the so-called neoclassical Stravinsky ever comes.
It got a quite ravishing account here, in which the beautiful tone
of Skride’s instrument – the Stradivarius ‘Wilhelmj’ violin of 1725
– was heard at its clearest. The orchestral strings are heard more
forcefully in this movement, and the work of the strings of the BBC
National Orchestra of Wales in this movement complemented the
elegant, expressive work of the soloist as attractively as the winds
had in the previous two movements. In the closing Capriccio the
complex opening was handled with authoritative clarity by Skride,
and Fischer’s conducting ‘placed’ the oblique orchestral comments to
great effect. The insistent ostinati were produced without any
danger of mere doggedness and the syncopated rhythms soon had the
foot tapping. It was a joy to be reminded once again of just what a
fine concerto this is. The performance was part of the Red Violin
Festival, of which Madeline Mitchell is the artistic director. In
the programme for the Festival, Mitchell writes that “in Welsh to
play the violin is can’ur ffidil (to sing the violin)”. Baiba
Skride certainly sang – and ‘danced’ – the violin, making it very
obvious why George Balanchine should have made use of this music for
his ballet Balustrade in 1941.
The balletic associations of Stravinky’s concerto made an apt
introduction to the work occupying the second half of the programme
– a suite from Prokofiev’s Romeo and Juliet. For this
performance, Thierry Fischer had selected material from all three of
the orchestral suites. So we heard ‘Montagues and Capulets’, ‘The
Child Juliet’ and ‘Scene’ (The Street Awakens), all from Suite Two,
‘Madrigal’ from Suite One, ‘Dance’ (Suite Two), ‘Romeo and Juliet’
(Suite One), ‘Romeo and Juliet Before Parting’ (Suite Two), the
‘Death of Tybalt’ (Suite One), ‘Romeo and Juliet’s Tomb’, from Suite
Two, and the ‘Death of Juliet’, from Suite Three. Prokofiev’s music
has plenty of theatrical flair and fire, and some rich sentiment.
But it always strikes me as a work of rhetoric rather than poetry,
of cleverly made effects (which suit their purpose admirably),
rather than a work which gets beyond gesture and evocation and into
the realms of musical necessity. It has sometimes been called an
orchestral showpiece and the term seems about right – insofar as one
doesn’t apply it to works which make one ‘forget’ the orchestra in
the experience of the music. It was certainly very well played by
Fischer and his orchestra. Fischer is a master of orchestral colour
and the various sections of the orchestra took their opportunities
to shine eagerly and effectively. Rhythmically lithe, Fischer’s
reading drove much of the music quite hard, but there was delicacy
too. ‘Scene’ (‘The Street Awakens’) was very nicely shaped, with an
attractive sense of growing alertness. The lower strings were very
good in an account of ‘Romeo and Juliet’ which had abundant ardour
and a certain emotional radiance; the long lines of ‘Rome
and Juliet Before Parting’ were played with grace and affectionate
dignity. The violence of the ‘Death of Tybalt’ was palpable, the
percussion section fierce, powerful and precise. ‘The Death of
Juliet’ prompted playing of real weight and gravity. For all the
accomplishment of both playing and conducting, however, I remained
unconvinced that this is really concert music of sufficient
merit and substance to sustain the entire second half of a
programme. It remains theatrical music, designed to support dancers
and narrative, rather than offering a fully integrated musical
argument. Fischer’s selection of pieces was a good one, but it
didn’t - by the very nature of the materials with which he was
working – amount to a truly satisfying musical whole.
Glyn Pursglove