Other Links
<Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD INTERNATIONAL CONCERT REVIEW
Bach, Beethoven, Brahms, and Chopin:
Murray Perahia, piano, Benaroya Hall,
Seattle,
16.10.2007
(BJ)
Bernard Jacobson
To judge from the response of a large audience, standing and
cheering vociferously at various points in the evening, Murray
Perahia is a favorite of the Seattle public. He has long been a
favorite with me too. Now 60–and an honorary KBE of the British
realm, no less–Perahia was a teenager when Peter Serkin introduced
him to me as we were leaving Marlboro to drive back to New York,
back in the mid-1960s, telling me he was a pianist to look out for.
For some years after that, I watched with delight as the young man
indeed developed into one of the great musicians of his time. Among
many notable achievements, his recordings of the Mozart piano
concertos still stand among the finest accounts of those challenging
works ever put on disc.
But those recordings were made a long time ago, and the equally
impressive live performances especially of Mozart and Schubert I
heard from him also took place years and even decades back. In
recent years, quite apart from some health problems that have
interrupted his career, I began to note a disturbing change in the
way he made music. Always a deep pianist, he seemed to have
conceived a desire to be a Big Pianist, which is not merely not the
same thing, but can actually be damaging to depth of musical
insight.
It gives me no pleasure to detach myself from the enthusiasm of the
audience around me, but I found further evidence of the trend in
Perahia’s performances on this occasion. He has lately been playing
a good deal of Bach, and the Fourth Partita, in D major, which
opened the program, was given with a fair degree of stylistic
appropriateness and an apt dynamic range. The rapid passages, on the
other hand, emerged generally smudged, with the principal note in
each group stressed to the detriment of the subsidiary ones. Both
here and in Beethoven’s “Pastoral” Sonata, Opus 28 in D major, there
was too much swelling and fading in the dynamics, and in the
Beethoven particularly this inflated the music beyond its innate
modesty of scale and undermined its charm.
Some of the evening’s best playing came after intermission, in the
quieter sections of Brahms’s Six Piano Pieces, Op. 118, and of the
Chopin group (two Études and the Third Ballade) that concluded the
official program. And yet here too I felt a dismaying tendency
toward excessively broad (and loud) effects–a general sort of
romanticizing-up of both composers’ expression–as well as more of
the cavalier articulation that bedeviled all of the program’s faster
music.
Comparisons, I know, can be a distasteful game to play, but
sometimes a critic needs to draw his readers’ attention to
performers with whom they may be unacquainted, and whose work casts
a different light on the musician under review. If you have heard
Sergey Schepkin play the Bach partitas, you must surely have
relished his performances’ clarity and elegance, and the magical way
he makes the lines in the counterpoint propel each other
athletically forward. And among many wonderful performances I have
heard, live or on record, of Schubert’s Impromptu in E-flat major,
Op. 90 No. 2, which was the first of Perahia’s two encores, one that
stands out particularly in memory is the one recorded on the IMP
Classics label back in 1990 by the Australian-born pianist Geoffrey
Saba, with its sheer creative impulsiveness of rhythm in the central
episode (or quasi-trio), and with a poise and lucidity in the
figurations of the main section that Perahia came nowhere achieving
on this disappointing evening. (If you want to hear how these two
relatively little-known pianists play the music in question, you can
find Schepkin’s recordings available through the Ongaku web site,
www.ongaku-records.com,
and
Saba’s
on his own site (www.geoffreysaba.com.)
There are still moments when Perahia’s stature peeps out again from
behind the facade of excessive rhetoric that now disfigures his
work. If he would only go back to first principles–to what made him
so great to begin with–no one could be more delighted than I should
be to greet the resurgence of a rare and treasurable talent.