Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD CONCERT REVIEW
Beethoven:
Yevgeny
Kissin (piano), London
Symphony Orchestra, Sir Colin Davis (conductor) 27.9.2007,
Barbican Hall, London (MB)
Mark Berry
Beethoven: Piano Concerto no.3 in C minor, Op.37
Beethoven: Symphony no.3 in E flat major, Op.55, 'Eroica'
This was the first concert held by the
LSO to celebrate the
eightieth birthday of Sir Colin Davis, now the orchestra's
President. Opinions at such a rarefied level vary, of course, but I
should go far as to call Sir Colin the greatest British conductor
since Beecham - and this in
no sense implies that I consider him
Beecham's inferior. (I am
assuming that we count Stokowski
as American, insofar as it matters.) After a prolonged period in
which Davis appeared to be lauded more abroad than at home, British
critics appear to have woken up to the fact that this is someone
very special indeed, and worthy of celebrating.
The concerto received a duly grand performance. There appears to be
little anyone can do completely to rid me of my reservations about
the opening tutti.
Wonderful though the music may be, it simply seems too long - a full
sonata-form exposition - before the soloist enters. Beethoven only
really heeded Mozart's example in his final two piano concertos,
both towering masterpieces. Nevertheless, Davis and his orchestra
played the music for all that it was worth. The strings really dug
into the music, and played as if their lives depended upon it. There
were no concessions to 'period' sonority or articulation.
Articulation was not pitted against phrasing, as tends to be the
case with such contemporary performances. (Nikolaus
Harnoncourt springs
immediately to mind.) Instead, phrases and paragraphs all fitted
into their place, as a consequence of a structural command and
orchestral weighting that recalled
Klemperer. Kissin
impressed throughout with his marvellous rich, almost
chocolate-like tone. His
articulation too was impeccable, again without any recourse to
short-breathed preciousness. It sounded as though his reading was
informed by his experience of voice-leading in Chopin, which gave
his performance a slightly unfamiliar and most welcome twist. Not
that it ever sounded 'like' Chopin, with the possible and perfectly
justifiable exception of the virtuosic first movement cadenza.
There, Kissin's double
octaves provided a feast for the ear; they were not indulgent, but
they were a treat.
The slow movement was allowed to unfold naturally, organically - or
rather, this was how it seemed, for much work is necessary (in
Davis's case, of course, many decades of experience) to engender
that sense of inevitability. There was no question of adopting the
fashionable tendency to rush, of transforming a
Largo
into an Andante.
In many senses, and certainly for a pianist, Beethoven's slow
movements present the greatest challenge of all. To sustain the
over-arching line without sacrifice of detail, and to plumb the
emotional depths without becoming merely 'heavy' is no easy thing.
If I am to be harshly critical, it seemed on occasion as if there
could have been greater integration of piano and orchestra. Davis
presented a more or less perfect canvas, upon which
Kissin painted some
ravishing detail, but the element of chamber music was not perhaps
quite so evident as it might have been. That said, the woodwind
solos here, as throughout, were delectable: somehow both pure and
sinuous.
This was also true of the finale, which provided a thrilling and
noble conclusion. The orchestra and Sir Colin were on truly wondrous
form, and Kissin's
pianism proved once again a
marvel in its dynamism and delicacy. Indeed, the latter was more to
the fore than it had been during the first movement. The one thing
lacking on his part, though not on the orchestra's, was a sense of
impish humour, never more to the fore than in Beethoven's ornaments
and syncopations. I am not
sure that Kissin 'does'
humour, but this was a minor drawback in a truly heroic account, by
far the best I have ever heard 'live'.
Such a performance augured well for the second half of the concert,
and we were not to be disappointed. The
Eroica
is a highlight of Davis's very fine set of Beethoven
symphonies with the Staatskapelle
Dresden, and this performance was at least as fine. From the shock
of those extraordinary - and yet in another sense so 'ordinary' -
opening chords onwards, everything, and I mean everything, was in
place for an inevitable unfolding of Beethoven's great symphonic
narrative. I do not think there was a single chord that was not
weighted so as to seem as it could not be otherwise, and the
conductor brought a profound sense of understanding to the work's
harmonic and rhythmic progress. There was no need for ascetic
thinning of textures, let alone for ugly tapering of phrases;
nothing was done to bring attention to itself. Instead, the
multifarious strands of Beethoven's blend of harmony and counterpart
were balanced so as to give just the right measure to both, and
never more so than in the finale's variations, where once again
comparisons with Klemperer
seemed justified: not just his
Eroica recordings, but also the
Grosse
Fuge.
Throughout, the strings - which can sometimes be the Achilles heel
of London orchestras - evinced a weight of tone and an athleticism
that sounded to the manor born. No other orchestra is ever going to
sound like the Vienna Philharmonic, and none is likely to
achieve quite the richness
of the Staatskapelle
Dresden; such odious comparisons aside, it is difficult to imagine
how an orchestra could have sounded more suited to the work and to
the composer. The brass have long been an especially valued section
of the LSO, and they
certainly shone on this occasion. Indeed, the horns, led by David
Pyatt - is there a better
horn player alive? - achieved a perfect blend, closer to Vienna than
we have any right to expect, during their celebrated opening to the
Scherzo. Before that, the long paragraphs of the Funeral March had
unfolded with such grandeur, such nobility, such inevitability, that
one could hardly fail to be moved to tears. Davis's moulding of
phrases, utterly un-self-conscious,
was an object lesson to those who would wish to 'do' too much with,
or rather to, this music. Tempo variations in the manner of
Furtwängler or
Barenboim, let alone
Mengelberg, have never been
his way. Such is the integrity of approach that what might stand in
danger of sounding 'worthy' on paper is anything but in practice,
not least since there is no lack of blistering attack where
necessary, 'necessary' being the operative word.
David Cairns, in a birthday appreciation printed in the programme,
drew attention to the prominence of woodwind in relation to the
strings in Davis's Dresden cycle. This was again apparent, and most
welcome, given the soloistic
brilliance of the LSO's
players, although 'prominence' is perhaps not quite the right word.
The instruments were allowed to shine where and when
necessary, Gareth
Davies's flute proving a
particular delight. Cairns
suggested that Davis might therefore have been more influenced by
the period instrument movement than he might care to admit. I do not
think this was or is the case at all. The delight in woodwind lines
more likely comes from Davis's great experience in Mozart, yet he
never wishes to reduce Beethoven, to stress his eighteenth-century
inheritance at the expense of what the composer was to usher in. If
'influence' there be, it seems more likely to have come from
Klemperer, whose
Philharmonia woodwinds were
always 'prominent'. But Davis
is very much his own man, and all the stronger for it. This concert
provided a splendid opportunity to confirm his independence from
fashion and, more importantly, his musical intelligence, wisdom, and
integrity.