Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
              SEEN 
              AND HEARD CONCERT  REVIEW 
              
              Sibelius: 
              Ben Heppner (tenor), Los Angeles Philharmonic Orchestra / 
              Esa-Pekka Salonen (conductor)  Barbican Hall, London, 13.11.07. 
              (ED)
               
              
              Much of what one hopes for in a world class concert was to be 
              found throughout the duration of this event; why then did I come 
              away from it feeling a little deflated by the experience?  Hardly 
              any technical fault could be ascribed to the 
              Los Angeles 
              players, who were not overly taxed by the programme. But maybe 
              this was the problem: that it all seemed too assured and too 
              easily achievable for them.
              
              The sixth symphony which began the concert is one of Sibelius’ 
              most challenging for the conductor. Not only do questions of tempo 
              inter-relationships have to be adequately resolved, but the 
              instrumental voices – particularly amongst the strings -  
              have to be carefully balanced. Salonen coped better with the 
              latter than the former, since he drove the work on relentlessly. 
              This was more effective in the ebullient third movement than 
              elsewhere. However, the fourth movement left me wishing for 
              greater variety of tone from the orchestra than was forthcoming.
              
              A selection of seven songs were performed with new orchestrations 
              commissioned by the orchestra from composer John Estacio 
              specifically to feature Ben Heppner as soloist. He delivered all 
              with much vitality of phrasing, even if his tone occasionally 
              exposed rawness due possibly to recent over-use. His contribution 
              however was enthusiastically received. I wish I had had similar 
              feelings about Estacio’s orchestrations, which seemed  
              consciously to steer away from Sibelius’ own models for orchestral 
              song. Both Heppner and Estacio were heard at their finest in 
              Soluppgang and Var det en dröm?, when orchestral 
              restraint found a suitable partner in the strong narrative sense 
              created by the text.
              
              The fifth symphony, played in its 1919 revision, found Salonen on 
              happier ground than in the sixth. Although from the start,  a 
              certain aloofness between conductor and music could be detected, 
              Salonen proved more willing in the fifth's opening movement than 
              in the previous symphony to draw the music’s various ideas 
              organically from one another. Even so,  some of the playing 
              verged on the brusque, brought about by Salonen’s preference for 
              precision when more generosity of feeling might have done Sibelius 
              greater favours.  The closing movement emphasised still further a 
              deliberate streak in both playing and composition. The abrupt 
              orchestral blows that close the work lent some credence to 
              Salonen’s overall approach, but perhaps too little too late.
              
              Ironically the encore, the Death of Melisande from Sibelius' 
              Pelleas  and Melisande, was full of tender feeling and 
              inflection from the upper strings particularly.  Salonen 
              conducted sans baton, and in the process let slip precious 
              emotion. If only this had happened earlier.
              
              
              
              Evan Dickerson
              
 
