Other Links
<Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD CONCERT REVIEW
Fragments of
Venice (4) : Nono,
La Lontananza nostalgica utopia futura Irvine Arditti
(violin), André Richard (sound projection) Queen Elizabeth Hall,
London, 31.10.2007(AO)
La Lontananza
is in many ways the quintessential expression of Nono’s
brilliance. It’s more than “just” music, it’s a conceptual
innovation which makes us rethink the very nature of music. For
Luigi Nono, music grew from life, and enhanced life and similarly
art didn’t need to be confined to any specific conventions. Form
was just a “construct” to help frame ideas conveniently because
the spirit of art lies beyond that, free and limitless as the
creative impulse. Too much is often made of Nono’s “political”
work, which so many of his contemporaries, like Henze and Berio
also pursued but his real genius lies in pieces like this, which
stretch the very spirit of art.
The South Bank Nono series wasn’t subtitled “Fragments of Venice”
for nothing. Entire programmes were devoted to Monteverdi and the
baroque masters for a very good reason. As a young man, Nono
spent a lot of time in the many churches in Venice, staying for
hours in their cool interiors. This was a completely different
world from the hot, noisy streets outside with their endless
bustle where Nono would have heard music performed with reverence,
and in an atmosphere conducive to inner reflection. He learned
things like polyphony, freedom of expression within ensemble, and
the subservience of elements like text to overall meaning. More
fundamentally, what he absorbed was the idea that music isn’t a
fixed, rigid commodity but a human experience that draws from many
sources, and has more possibilities than we can imagine. It’s no
surprise then, that so many cutting edge composers today, like
Ferneyhough, draw inspiration from the baroque, just as Nono did.
La Lontananza
is performed in darkness, as if in an ancient, unlit and unheated
church. This stills the mind, the better that we can focus on
contemplation, free of external distractions. The first sounds we
hear come from behind a screen, “masked” as it were – another
aspect of the intriguing ambiguity that is so much part of the
magic of Venice. It is only when Irvine Arditti quietly
materialises at the side of the screen that you realise that the
violin you’re hearing exists not in “reality” but on a recording,
forcing the listener to ask, 'What is reality ? What is illusion ?
' and ' Why ? ' which is even more pertinent.
In a church, what you hear is literally shaped by space. In the
nave, you’ll hear certain resonances not quite so clear in the
wings. Even the height of the roof impacts on the way things
sound. Yet all are part of the whole experience. Thus Nono has
the violinist moving from place to place in the auditorium.
Processions, and movement, are part of music in many cultures, not
just in Christianity, but something we’ve lost in the
fixed-platform approach that has dominated western music for the
last 300 years. Thus Arditti makes a progress round the hall,
playing at different stands. At first it seems to matter “where”
he’s playing, but as the music unfolds, that focus no longer seems
important. What impresses more is the seamless, surround sound
quality of the experience. Gradually it no longer matters what is
being played live and what’s recorded, for the human violinist
blends with the electronic version of himself on tape with such
seamlessness that reality itself blurs once more. Again, we have
the image of Venice, half built on water, half on land, and of
horizons where sea blends into sky.
La Lontananza
has a sub title, “madrigale per più ‘caminantes’ con Gideon
Kremer”. The different positions that Arditti plays in aren’t
just for acoustic completeness, but reflect subtle progressions in
the music itself. For Nono, the idea of movement, of “travelling”
is fundamental. His music “goes somewhere” and is open ended.
The theme of journeying recurs in works like Hay no caminar
which itself exists in two versions, one growing out of the
other. That title refers to an inscription Nono spotted in an old
building. “Caminantes,
no hay caminos, hay que caminar”. It means “Travellers, there are
no roads, but we travel on.” The South Bank series wisely
presented Hay no Caminar twice, first in its
semi-orchestral version with the London Sinfonietta, and then in
the version for two violins, before which Arditti led a
masterclass. Arditti had studied the piece with Nono himself, so
his insights were fascinating. He explained the significance of
minute details so lucidly that even non-string players could
appreciate what he meant.
This
fascination with journeys connects to something quite fundamental
in Nono’s music. He’s an explorer, seeking new direction and
means of expression. The “journeying” also fills a spiritual
purpose. Nowadays, we expect so much instant-access expertise,
however superficial, that it’s easy to forget that in many
cultures, the path to wisdom is through humble learning and
experience. La Lontananza is a pilgrimage towards some
undefined goal, a kind of atheist Stations of the Cross. Its quiet
but firm traverse is a kind of meditation, making us listen
patiently and examine why.
A friend who did a lot of
the theoretical maths that’s behind modern sound technology used
to say that our ideas of “mono” and “stereo” were hopelessly
primitive, because sound is ambient, coming at us from all
sources, and at all levels. It’s our brains that filter and
process what we “hear” whatever the sound sources. It’s not
surface 'noise' that makes music, but something altogether more
elusive. Everything goes into the experience. Thus, if during
this performance, we heard the sounds of workmen outside the
auditorium, and coughs from the audience, it wasn’t a problem
because this music functioned on many levels. Remember Nono,
sitting in a church while a different world revolved around
outside.
Each performance of this work is unique as it’s shaped by the
spatial and acoustic properties of wherever it’s played. A church
is a purpose-built “performance space” because its design and
ornamentation extend the impact of the music. Even the cruciform
shape is symbolic. The Latin Mass could be like total theatre,
conveying meaning in many levels, so even if the actual words were
in an alien language, the impact still came through. Architecture
shapes sound. In a church, high vaulted ceilings make sound echo,
and what you hear in the wings is different from what you hear in
the nave. Yet it’s all part of the same “whole”, whatever the
angle from which it’s heard. Nono’s use of the entire performance
space thus breaks rigid boundaries of sound projection and creates
a more flexible approach to what music can be. His use of
recorded sound and snatches of mechanical sound or taped noises
also expands the panorama of what we hear beyond the confines of
“formal” music. Sound projection becomes an art form in its own
right. André Richard, who has performed this piece since its
inception, knows how to gauge a venue and its acoustic, and
operates his instrument like a chamber player, sensitive to what’s
happening around him and to his partner, the live soloist. The
possibilities of creating music in space are still being explored:
just this year, Simon Bainbridge premiered two pieces on this
theme, Music Sound Reflection and Diptych, which
incidentally was inspired by Venice.
Arditti’s
violin is clearly venerable, for its tone is lusciously rich and
resonant – even with a broken string. It would sound exquisite in
any music, yet here he manages to coax beautiful new sounds which
its maker might not have imagined. Here we heard Arditti, in
music that’s still state of the art, yet his instrument would
have been played by many other great virtuosos in their time and
hopefully, it will serve other musicians in centuries to come.
The performance juxtaposed past, present and future. Once again,
the world of the baroque connects to the modern, in parallel just
as in Venice, traces of the past co-exist with the present.
For Nono, history was important and he was immensely proud of what
Venice had achieved. By humbly learning from its traditions, he
could continue to build on them, in his own way : there is so much
in La Lontananza that rewards patient “pilgrimage” into its
many depths.
Anne
Ozorio