|
|
Editorial
Board
London Editor:
(London UK)
Melanie
Eskenazi
Regional Editor:
(UK regions and Worldwide)
Bill
Kenny
Webmaster:
Bill
Kenny
Music Web Webmaster:
Len
Mullenger
|
MusicWeb is a
subscription-free site
Clicking Google adverts on our pages helps us keep it that way
Seen
and Heard International Opera Review
Puccini,
Madama Butterfly:
Soloists, Orchestra and Chorus Teatro Real,
Conductor: Plácido Domingo, Teatro Real de
Madrid, 17/18.7. 2007 (JMI)
Production by the Teatro Real, premiered
April 2002:
Director: Mario Gas
Sets: Ezio Frigerio
Costumes: Franca Squarciapino
Lighting: Vinicio Cheli
Casts:
Cio Cio San: Cristina
Gallardo-Domas/Micaela Carosi
Pinkerton: Carl Tanner/Roberto Aronica
Sharpless: Vladimir Stoyanov/Ángel Ódena
Suzuki: Marina Rodríguez-Cusí /Itxaro
Mentxaka
The Teatro Real has been offering non-subscription
performances of operas from the main repertoire at
popular prices for the
past year or so. This initiative is praiseworthy,
since it allows a larger public to see major
operas with well-known titles and good casts
cheaply without having to commit themselves to a
whole season.
This production had its premiere at the Teatro
Real in April 2002 with stage direction by Mario
Gas and a world famous team of collaborators: Ezio
Frigerio, Franca Squarciapino and Vinicio Cheli.
The production consists of filming a black and
white movie in the 40s, with their cameras,
placards, floodlights, make-up girls etc, etc. It
is an original concept and naturally has its pros
and cons. Among the pros is the preparation of
movie shooting before the opera actually starts
and the continuous projection of live images
(black and white) on the screen above the stage,
which allows a very close follow up of the
interpretation. Among disadvantages, the loss of
some intimacy should be mentioned, since the
action surrounded by so many cameras and people.
It is an novel vision however and the audience
clearly love it. It includes the recreation of
Butterfly’s Dream, with a brief appearance of
Pinkerton, embracing both Cio Cio San and their
son. More distracting and therefore less
interesting are the almost continuous and
gratuitous turning of the movie stage in a kind of
a “merry go round”. Cio Cio San's house is framed
by a series of columns which could in truth be
recycled as Dalila’s mansion or Idomeneo’s palace.
A good perspective of the sea is continuously
present at the back of the stage, except at the
beginning of Act II when we see red neon lights
instead for a short while. Costumes are very
suited to the idea of the movie filming with
kimonos always in black, grey and white to which
the only exception is the red kimono that
Butterfly wears for her wedding and suicide.
The lighting is particularly good and has a real
impact on the drama.
Musical Direction was the responsibility of
Plácido
Domingo, surely an authentic miracle in the world
of opera. Passed the age of official retirement
for common mortals, he continues with an amazing
range of activities. As singer, conductor, theatre
manager, he has become a real Renaissance Man of
the theatre and it's not impossible to imagine him
him singing and conducting at the same time
Although his ability as a conductor is still not
quite comparable to his singing, I have to concede
that Mr. Domingo has improved greatly and these
days his appearance in the pit is already a
guarantee of quality, at least in operas from the
main repertoire. His reading was very sound,
getting a good performance from Orquesta Sinfónica
de Madrid, and was in fact superior to some
performances we have heard directed by other more
recognized maestros. Within this more than
reliable reading however, it would be reasonable
to ask for greater control of the stage action
(he's too dependent on the score at the moment),
for more life in the love duet in the first act
and less volume at certain points.
There were two different casts with two
outstanding sopranos. The great protagonist of the
first cast was the Chilean Cristina Gallardo-Domas,
making her Teatro Real debut in this performance.
She obtained a very well deserved triumph and
confirmed she is one of the great Cio Cio Sans
these days. The first act seemed rather
uncomfortable for her but she made the famous
entrance with ability and without brilliance. From
“Un bel dí vedremo” onwards though, the Chilean
soprano became the absolute power on the stage,
possessed of a very beautiful voice, singing with
an infinity of shades and able to overcome the
volume of the orchestra with ease, The public
stopped the orchestra after the intense arioso
that ends the duet with Sharpless, so great was
the conviction, quality and emotion of her
interpretation. She has decided apparently to drop
the role from her repertoire, which is hardly
good news.
The Italian Micaela Carosi, also making her debut
in the theatre, was the Butterfly in the second
cast. Hers is one of the more outstanding Verdian
voices at present, although her suitability for Puccini in general and Butterfly in particular
raises some reasonable doubts. A great Cio Cio San
needs not only a voice of great beauty and
stamina, but she also has to move the audience to
the point of tears. From my point of view the
fragility of the character and its great
vulnerability is a fundamental part of its
interpretation and it was exactly in these aspects
that Carosi's performance was not wholly
convincing since her physical size (not volume)
does not help to make her believable.
The first act created problems for her - more than
usual - whereas afterwards she was much more
comfortable although never completely scaling the
necessary barriers of emotion. In summary, she's a
good Butterfly vocally, but I do not believe that
Butterfly is a good choice for her. She is an
outstanding Verdian soprano more than a Puccini
heroine.
The American tenor Carl Tanner was a deficient
Pinkerton. The voice is potentially an important
one, but has many unresolved problems just now,
the most important of which is that his vocal
projection leaves much to be desired. “Addio
fiorito asil” was too poor to be acceptable.
In America it is apparently very normal for
Pinkerton to be booed at the end of this opera and
perhaps somebody told Carl Tanner the pious lie
that this custom has been transferred to Europe.
He should not believe this story. There was no boo
at all for to Roberto Aronica, but a rapturous
reception at the end of the opera. He has a truly
beautiful voice, perfectly projected and was
absolutely convincing as Pinkerton.
Vladimir Stoyanov was a good, if not great,
Sharpless with a beautiful voice, although rather
small, and showing with his usual problem of
projection in the high notes while Ángel
Ódena was a more routine consul. Marina
Rodríguez-Cusí was an excellent Suzuki both as
singer and actress and should be singing more.
Itxaro Mentxaka was also decent, if rather light
for the role.
Cristina Gallardo Domas received a standing
ovation with bravos that put the structure of the
theatre in danger. Hers was a well deserved
triumph. Aronica, Carosi, Stoyanov, Rodríguez-Cusí
and Plácido (what a huge paradox in his name!)
shared in her triumph though at a lower level.
Carl Tanner received boos mixed with polite
applause.
The program notes included a curious story about
the characters, worthy of a libretto for
Butterfly Part II. Pinkerton and Kate return
to San Diego, later divorce and Paul Butterfly
(the name chosen for the child on his way to the
USA) goes to school without the support of his
“mother” Kate, who loses care of him. Sharpless
retires and marries Suzuki, keeping in touch with
Paul. Pinkerton is ultimately discovered dead
(hara-kiri with the Mikado’s sword) and Paul
writes back joyfully to Sharpless.
José
M. Irurzun
Back
to the Top
Back to the Index Page
|
Seen and Heard, one of the longest established live
music review web sites on the Internet, publishes original reviews
of recitals, concerts and opera performances from the UK and internationally.
We update often, and sometimes daily, to bring you fast reviews,
each of which offers a breadth of knowledge and attention to performance
detail that is sometimes difficult for readers to find elsewhere.
Seen and Heard
publishes interviews with musicians, musicologists and directors
which feature both established artists and lesser known performers.
We also feature articles on the classical music industry and we
use other arts media to connect between music and culture in its
widest terms.
Seen and Heard
aims to present the best in new criticism from writers with a radical
viewpoint and welcomes contributions from all nations. If you would
like to find out more email Regional
Editor Bill Kenny. |
|
|
Contributors: Marc
Bridle, Martin Anderson, Patrick Burnson, Frank Cadenhead, Colin
Clarke, Paul Conway, Geoff Diggines, Sarah Dunlop, Evan Dickerson
Melanie Eskenazi (London Editor) Robert J Farr, Abigail Frymann,
Göran Forsling, Simon Hewitt-Jones, Bruce Hodges,Tim Hodgkinson,
Martin Hoyle, Bernard Jacobson, Tristan Jakob-Hoff, Ben Killeen,
Bill Kenny (Regional Editor), Ian Lace, John Leeman, Sue Loder,Jean
Martin, Neil McGowan, Bettina Mara, Robin Mitchell-Boyask, Simon
Morgan, Aline Nassif, Anne Ozorio, Ian Pace, John Phillips,
Jim Pritchard, John Quinn, Peter Quantrill, Alex Russell, Paul
Serotsky, Harvey Steiman, Christopher Thomas, Raymond Walker, John Warnaby,
Hans-Theodor Wolhfahrt, Peter Grahame Woolf (Founder & Emeritus
Editor)
|
Site design: Bill Kenny
2004 |