Other Links
<Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD CONCERT REVIEW
Dvořák:
Pierre-Laurent Aimard (piano); London Symphony Orchestra/Michał
Dworzyński. Barbican Hall, London, 11.10. 2007 (CC)
Last
minute cancellations are surely the dreams of every aspiring
conductor. To make one’s
mark on the international scene because of an indisposition is an
opportunity not to be wasted.
The 28 year old Polish conductor, Michał Dworzyński, stepped in for
Daniel Harding at the eleventh hour for an all-Dvořák programme.
This could have been the stuff fairy tales are made of …
“Could
have”
being the operative phrase.
The
young Dworzyński won the Donatella Flick Conducting Competition in
2006; part of the prize was an Assistant Conductorship of the LSO.
His big break even came with a gift-wrapped top-flight soloist in
tow. In the end, the evening was a rather lacklustre affair. Still,
good to hear Dvořák’s
Othello
Overture of 1891/2. Dvořák’s tone poems are substantial enough and
inspired enough to warrant regular performances, but somehow they do
not have seemed to have attained the popularity of the Slavonic
Dances (the Op. 72 set was originally programmed as the second half
of this concert). At just under a quarter of an hour,
Othello
is a relatively terse affair that was actually the highlight of the
concert. From the tender string phrasing of the opening through to
much affectionate playing later on, there was much to admire. A
sloppy brass attack was a shame, but there was much to admire in
Dworzyński’s highlighting of the gestural. The delicious
orchestration was duly relished, and the very Wagnerian progression
towards the end led to a passage of real darkness. Dworzyński’s beat
is clear, his body movements similarly so, but often rather studied.
Strange, as spontaneity, after all, is what the occasion seemed to
demand.
Aimard has recorded the Dvořák Piano Concerto, a reading (on Teldec)
that I have never really warmed to, perhaps because of the
contribution of Harnoncourt there. On this occasion, Aimard chose,
surprisingly, to use a score; another surprise was his
over-projected right-hand, initially at least. His interpretative
stance seemed at first rather objective, although perhaps a digital
alarm going off as he began to play distracted him! Later he warmed
in to the music somewhat but he never attained the grand sweep of
Richter (I think of the Bavarian performance with Kleiber, currently
on an EMI GROC). Aside from one superfluous gesture to the timpani,
Dworzyński showed himself a fine accompanist. If the orchestral
opening of the slow movement was rather literal (Aimard was far more
tender), it set the pace for this movement - the orchestra simply
could not sustain Aimard’s concentration, a problem also in the
finale, which tended to meander rather. Aimard’s big, almost
Brahmsian statement towards the end was not enough to redeem a
performance of a work that deserves all the championing at the
highest level it can get.
The Eighth Symphony is quite an interpretative challenge. Dworzyński
imparted a nice feeling of breadth to the famous opening before
giving rather too much frenzy later on. The slow movement had me
wondering whether Dworzyński really should use a score. He spent too
much time looking down, not enough engaging with his players.
Perhaps as a result, drama was on the low side and the LSO sounded
distinctly under par. Subtlety was generally lacking, as was any
off-the-cuff magic, the latter a fault particularly evident in the
third movement, with its forced-sounding string portamenti. The
finale, at least, was a success, broadly-speaking. Horn trills were
nicely non-elephantine, climaxes were given their due and it was
clear that Dworzyński was trying to be alive to the wide-ranging
emotions of this movement. There is hope, it seems, but I cannot say
I will be first in line for his next concert.
Colin Clarke