Beethoven: Gerard Schwarz, cond., John Lill,
Seattle Symphony, Benaroya Hall,
Seattle,
1.03.2007 (BJ)
Whizz-kids of the piano come and go. In some cases they grow into artists of
distinction, in others they go as soon as they came, and in all too many
instances they acquire careers out of proportion to their exiguous talents.
Meanwhile, without perhaps ever becoming household names à la Horowitz or
Rubinstein, fine musicians like John Lill go on playing wonderfully year after
year. So it was a pleasure to welcome this English pianist to
Seattle
for a pair of programs encompassing all five of Beethoven’s concertos for his
instrument.
At the first of these concerts, supported with gusto and near-perfect unanimity
by the Seattle Symphony under its music director, Gerard Schwarz, Lill showed
yet again why he is widely regarded as a musicians’ musician. The two works on
this program were the Fourth and Fifth concertos, and I do not think I have ever
heard a pair of performances that so expertly delineated their sharply
contrasted characters. In the Fourth Concerto before intermission Lill took
every opportunity to relax the pulse and refine the dynamics in response to
every poetic impulse in this supremely poetic score. This was music-making in
the grand manner, realized with tone that ranged from the occasional thunderous
(but never harsh) fortissimo to a ravishingly soft (but never
exaggerated) pianissimo. Lill’s penchant here for slowing down at crucial
“plot points” was evidence of daring–but where the Pogoreliches and Lang Langs
of this world impose their interpretative ideas on the music from outside, Lill
drew his from a profound identification with what Beethoven wrote, and with the
tradition he worked in.
I waited with fascination, then, to hear how he would approach the bigger, more
assertive, and altogether more outward-oriented Fifth Concerto. In the event,
just as his delicacy in No. 4 was never allowed to undercut the power of the
climaxes, so in No. 5 pianissimo touches were never lacking at the right
moments, while the huge declarative statements of such passages as the
cadenza-like flourishes that set the first moment on its course were delivered
with truly astonishing strength and solidity, and with a freedom from the
tyranny of the bar-line that attained spontaneity without obscuring the arc of
the solo line. Rhythmically, too, the performance took an opposite tack to what
we had heard in No. 4. This time, even in passages like the first movement’s
subordinate theme where pianists often enjoy pausing to enjoy the scenery, Lill
kept the music moving eagerly ahead.
There were two places, one in each concerto, that might with advantage have been
done differently. In one of the episodes in the Fourth Concerto’s finale, I
would have enjoyed, under the beautifully shaped treble line, a little more
emphasis on the magically propulsive left-hand part. And the slow movement of
No. 5 was, I felt, just a little too slow, having the effect of four
beats to the measure rather than Beethoven’s indicated alla breve meter.
But the near-immobility Lill and Schwarz fashioned did have the result that the
first measures of the finale came as a genuinely thrilling explosion under
Lill’s hands. In any case, these were minor points that in no substantial way
diminished the splendor of the occasion.
Bernard
Jacobson