PROM 47:
                      Shostakovich, Schnittke, Tchaikovsky, Yuri Bashmet 
                      (viola) / London Symphony Orchestra / Valery Gergiev 
                      (conductor), Royal Albert Hall, 18.08.06 (ED)
 
 
Shostakovich: The 
Golden Age - excerpts
Schnittke: Viola 
Concerto
Tchaikovsky: 
Symphony No. 6 in B minor, 'Pathétique'
 
 
                       To 
                        open his long weekend residency at the Royal Albert Hall 
                        Valery Gergiev presented with the LSO excerpts from Shostakovich's 
                        The Golden Age, a work that sought to fuse lip service 
                        to decadent Western musical forms with an acceptable socialist 
                        aesthetic. A hard task for anyone to fulfill, and although 
                        Shostakovich gave it his best the work was a flop when 
                        first performed. With distance from its time of creation, 
                        however, it has become easier to identify the work as 
                        central to a specific thread within Shostakovich's writing. 
                        It quickly became apparent that Shostakovich's often quirky 
                        sense of humour comes as second nature to Gergiev - although 
                        this was countered in his conducting by launching into 
                        the selected items with a couple of dances taken at hair-raisingly 
                        driven tempi. Soft jazziness imbued much else of the remaining 
                        five numbers: the soprano saxophone nicely to the fore 
                        in Dance of the Diva and the most sensitive of foxtrots 
                        that was possessed of some very evident tongue-in-cheek 
                        playing. Smiles all round were in evidence at composers 
                        sly take on 'Tea for Two' in the Entr'acte before an uproarious 
                        Cancan brought the set to a close.
                        
                        Alfred 
                        Schnittke's viola concerto received its third Proms performance 
                        with Yuri Bashmet, the work's dedicatee, as soloist. On 
                        the two previous occasions (1989 and 1996) I was in the 
                        Arena crowd and the work left such a strong impression 
                        that the other works on the programme seemed but afterthoughts. 
                        The works sense of foreboding is obvious from the start 
                        - appropriate as it happens, Schnittke was to suffer a 
                        heart attack just days after completing the score. The 
                        solo line, on this occasion played with poignant hollowness 
                        by Bashmet, set its path in motion over sparse, unemotional 
                        strings. Gergiev's unleashing of the full orchestral body, 
                        however, left one in no doubt of the dark humour the work 
                        contains also, monstrous in scale though it might be. 
                        Dance episodes, very echt-classical, were brutally given 
                        despite the tender dynamic that was often requested by 
                        Schnittke; something of a paradox indeed. In some senses 
                        the leading voice of the work passes from soloist to orchestra 
                        as the work progresses, but Gergiev held back his plan 
                        of the overall direction until the last moment. In this 
                        respect at least, one could sense some connection with 
                        Shostakovich, as we've just heard a composer with an equally 
                        quick and dark wit.
                        
                        Parallel 
                        paths of psychedelic fantasy were in fact established 
                        within this reading, each as bizarre and far-fetched as 
                        the other. For all Gergiev's whipped up formalism in the 
                        final section, it is nonetheless the viola's coda that 
                        proves to be the work's true emotional kernel and representative 
                        of the composer's condition. With Bashmet giving lyrical 
                        snatches of line it almost appeared as some kind of remission 
                        from the increasingly dour and oppressive atmosphere all 
                        around. Such moves by Bashmet though were rebuffed with 
                        intentionally matter-of-fact and perfunctory orchestral 
                        playing which could do little to banish the now long-established 
                        mood of unease within the music. Gergiev's lengthy pause 
                        to hold silence before the outbreak of applause at the 
                        work's close only seemed to heighten the feelings of tension 
                        that this concerto can leave in its wake.
                        
                        Back 
                        in 1989, Gergiev was scheduled to conduct the Schnittke 
                        concerto, but his indisposal led to a substitution of 
                        conductor and final work in the programme: the work chosen 
                        to replace Act III of Sleeping Beauty was Tchaikovsky's 
                        'Pathétique' symphony. On that occasion it was fairly 
                        unimpressively performed, but with Gergiev on the podium 
                        I had high hopes things would be different. I was not 
                        to be disappointed. It was a performance, for me at least, 
                        that brought home the qualities that make Gergiev such 
                        an in demand and exciting figure for the musicians he 
                        conducts, as well as the public. Many attending a concert 
                        could find an attraction in his 'remote and rugged' figure 
                        (as I have heard him described), his nervous almost manic 
                        energy on the podium or his knowledge of what he wants 
                        or demands from his players. But watch him carefully: 
                        the right hand has an edgy twitch that never rests; the 
                        left giving the beat, but with it also so much energy 
                        and freedom to his players. It is a far from straightforward 
                        mix to pull off, but Gergiev makes it appear so simple. 
                        I doubt if there's anything tangible one could identify 
                        at the heart of this phenomenon, it's more likely based 
                        on two qualities that elude most conductors all their 
                        lives: musicality and respect.
                        
                        Proof 
                        that both run with ease between the LSO and Gergiev was 
                        only too evident here. Gergiev's resolutely unhackneyed 
                        tempi must have come as a breath of fresh air to players 
                        and audience alike who were after something different 
                        from a tired and predictable play-through of the score. 
                        Within the overall framework Gergiev seemingly allowed 
                        the players to shape much of their own parts: murmured 
                        strings at the opening, the careful viola phrasing of 
                        the second movement, precise yet restrained articulation 
                        in the woodwinds during the third movement before an exuberant 
                        repeat, or warmth despite despair in the final movement 
                        were all instances of this. But Gergiev realized that 
                        such freedom was only fully effective when controlled, 
                        and the ultimate control was to be the work's unremitting 
                        downward emotional spiral. Carefully calculated it was 
                        directed with a near improvisatory touch by Gergiev that 
                        was both disarming and deadly in its results. Unsurprisingly, 
                        the LSO players were as one in praising their Principal 
                        Conductor Designate for his efforts, but they too deserve 
                        a large measure of credit. Only when I was at the very 
                        brink of desolation did I realize it and was barely the 
                        wiser for how I had arrived there. The journey home was 
                        a solitary reflection on that journey: equally dark yet 
                        uplifting in the wonder at what had taken place.
 
 
                       
                         
                        Evan Dickerson