Editorial Board


North American Editor:
(USA and Canada)
Marc Bridle


London Editor:
(London UK)

Melanie Eskenazi

Regional Editor:
(UK regions and Europe)
Bill Kenny

 

Webmaster: Len Mullenger

 

 

                    

Google

WWW MusicWeb


Search Music Web with FreeFind




Any Review or Article


 

 

Seen and Heard International Concert Review

 

 

 

Beethoven, Ligeti, Bartok: Peter Serkin, Piano, New York Philharmonic,  Jonathan Nott, Conductor, Avery Fisher Hall, New York City, 26.10.2006 (BH)

 

 

Beethoven: Overture to König Stephan (King Stephen), Op. 117 (1811)

Ligeti: Lontano, for Large Orchestra (1967)

Bartók: Piano Concerto No. 1, BB 91 (1926)

Beethoven: Symphony No. 5 in C minor, Op. 67 (1804-08)

 

 

 

It is a bit hard to believe that the invigorating Beethoven König Stephan Overture had not been performed here since 1980, particularly since every last work of the composer seems to be recycled every year without any loss of audience interest.  (I say this as a fan of the composer, but also as one who regrets the many unusual and worthy pieces that fall by the wayside in favor of yet more Beethoven.)  That said, the overture was given a vigorous, splash-of-cold-water reading by Jonathan Nott, fast rising as one of the world’s most intriguing conductors.  Nott’s programming instincts are sometimes almost giddy in their daring but precise in their juxtapositions (such as his memorable Beethoven, Ligeti, Mahler and Strauss extravaganza with the Bamberg Symphony last year).  Beethoven’s huge sound blocks seemed to anticipate the Ligeti, written some 156 years later.

By now many think that Lontano is one of the 20th century’s masterpieces, along with Atmosphères, written about the same time.  Both approach the idea of music in a completely new way, and just as the revolutionary aspects of Beethoven must have shocked his listeners, the extreme ideas in Lontano still have the power to disturb and perplex.  Yet with Nott as the best possible guide, encountering Ligeti’s seething textures felt as natural as entering a room, albeit a space in which the proportions are subtly distorted and continuing to evolve, thanks to slow-moving shifts of timbre and pitch.  The orchestration is radical for its time.  A favorite texture has the contrabassoon at one end of the spectrum, simultaneously with the concertmaster in a high harmonic, with nary another sound in between.  The Philharmonic generated some unearthly plates of sound, subtly turning and shifting, ardently following Nott, who has a clear-sighted ability to get to the heart of Ligeti’s physical sound world.  (He has recorded two superb discs of composer’s work on Teldec, with the Berlin Philharmonic.)

After being surprised at the scarce performances of the Beethoven, I am even more shocked that one could have been a New York Philharmonic subscriber for twenty-four years, and never have heard the Bartók First Piano Concerto, last performed by the Philharmonic in 1982 (with Daniel Barenboim and Zubin Mehta).  At this point all three of Bartók’s concertos are acknowledged to be among the most well-wrought for the instrument, and I am a particular devotee of this one, arguably the most difficult.  The piano is treated in a relentlessly percussive way, with wild barrages sometimes unable to reach above the equally dense orchestral passages.  On paper, I was absolutely delighted to find out that the soloist was Peter Serkin, but at least on this occasion, he seemed slightly at odds with the material.  The opening seemed far too timid, not nearly as ominous as it must be, and often I felt the volume was simply too soft for this ritual nightmare.  Now and then Nott would turn around, urging on his soloist, but the body language between them telegraphed that something wasn’t quite right, and the performance did not have the barbaric authority that it must.  The orchestra sounded terrific, if also slightly hesitant, and at some points I could see Mr. Serkin with his fingers in a quintessential blur of hammering (which the piece is), but his sound was sometimes overwhelmed.

It happened a bit serendipitously, but I had the great pleasure of hearing the Beethoven Fifth Symphony with a friend who had never heard the piece in live performance.  (I highly recommend this procedure for works that have become stale from overexposure.) But “overexposure” would have been the last word on my mind after hearing this muscular, pinging reading of arguably the most famous piece in the literature, with the Philharmonic playing with the kind of zeal usually accorded to Mahler these days.  The stormy, propulsive first movement led to a second on the brisk side, with gorgeous work by the group’s flute, clarinet and bassoon in the middle interlude.  The final two sections were taken very fast – the finale so infectious that one could have danced to it.  Nott’s affability with contemporary scores informs his classics with invigorating surprises, and as in the opening overture, it was easy to imagine that one was hearing the Fifth for the first time – no easy task these days.

 

 

Bruce Hodges

 


 



Back to the Top     Back to the Index Page


 





   

 

 

 
Error processing SSI file

 

Error processing SSI file