Bruch and Mendelssohn:
Tamsin Waley-Cohen, violin, Orchestra of St John's / John Lubbock, conductor,
Cadogan Hall, 6.4.2006 (ED)
Tamsin
Waley-Cohen first came to my attention in the 2005
Royal College of Music String Player of the Year
concert, and I was impressed with her playing, so
it came as a welcome opportunity to hear her again
in the more expansive context of Bruch’s first violin
concerto.
Her reading
seemingly began in media res with the first
solo statements hinting at glimpses of the eternal
that Bruch extends to great effect as the work continues.
If early on there was a slight tendency for some
phrases not to be given their full due, this was
quickly overcome as confidence and passionate advocacy
of the solo line took hold. With playing that emphasized
inherent musicality over the display of virtuoso
technique for its own sake Waley-Cohen proved a
persuasive and enchanting soloist. Particularly
pleasing was her willingness to inflect the part
with shadings of piano playing without making the
effect seem anything other than natural. In respect
of the tone Waley-Cohen produced, this was possessed
of an unforced singing quality that was notable
in the higher register, which contrasted well with
the rich chest voice of her instrument’s lower ranges.
The second movement was memorable for the direct
simplicity of her playing and phrasing, whilst the
third movement was imbued with a rousing bite to
the phrasing.
In a work
so well known as this it can, alas, be commonplace
for audiences to encounter performances built around
the soloist, whilst the orchestra runs routinely
through the motions. Such a state of affairs was
clearly anathema to the Orchestra of St John’s under
John Lubbock’s direction, it being from the first
unfailingly vital and full of orchestral sonorities
that proved as worthy of attention as Waley-Cohen’s
playing of the solo part. Brass and woodwind lines
were distinctive for the character they added to
the rich unity of tone found in the strings. John
Lubbock’s guidance allowed individual sections the
space to shape their own phrases whilst never losing
sight of the overall architectural plan of the concerto.
With an opening tempo sensibly chosen, linked to
the broad-breathed central movement gave way to
a finale that was infectiously caught rhythmic drive.
Lubbock’s
direction of Mendelssohn’s Italian symphony continued
in the same vein as the closing movement of the
concerto, emphasizing the vivace – the wonder
of the young composer at the glories of Italy –
in the writing with notable contributions from oboes,
clarinets and brass departments. Relative weight
was brought to bear in the string playing that proved
most effective. The andante con moto was given with
impressive unison playing underlined not too forcefully
by the brass, and in the movement’s steady long
lines readily brought to mind the regularity of
a pilgrim’s march said to have inspired it. The
character of the third movement was noticeably more
Germanic, and this was caught in the expressive
horn motifs that punctuate the writing, giving it
a certain matter-of-fact quality. To close, Lubbock
most delightfully allowed fine woodwind lines to
emerge with vibrancy from the full orchestral texture.
That this is a young composer’s joyous work was
undeniable, and how wonderful that a concert billed
as “full
of the joys of Spring” left one feeling uplifted
now that the long winter nights are finally past
us.
Evan Dickerson