Cheltenham Music Festival (5):
Beethoven Piano Sonatas: in G major, Op. 79 (1809);
in D major, Op. 20 “Pastoral” (1801); in B
Flat major Op. 106, “Hammerklavier”(1817-18).
Paul Lewis (piano) Pittville Pump Room, Cheltenham, 13.07.2006
(JQ)
The young British pianist, Paul Lewis, has been acquiring
a formidable reputation over the last few years. Already
widely praised for his performances and recordings of
Schubert’s piano sonatas, he’s now turned
his attention to Beethoven and this year and next he is
presenting the complete cycle of 32 piano sonatas in a
series of concerts round the world and is also recording
them. UK readers may have heard recently on BBC Radio
3 the four recitals that he gave not long ago at London’s
Wigmore Hall. The remaining sonatas are to be given in
four more Wigmore Hall recitals next year, I understand,
and I hope that they will also be broadcast.
It was the fourth and last of the afore-mentioned Wigmore
Hall programmes that Lewis brought to Cheltenham. The
recital was clearly one of the Hot Tickets of the festival
and a sell-out audience greeted him. His programme was
shrewdly chosen and beautifully balanced. In the first
half he gave the little Sonata in G major, Op. 79 and
the Sonata in G major, Op. 28 ‘Pastoral’.
After the interval there was just one work, the mighty
Sonata in B flat major, Op. 106, the ‘Hammerklavier’.
As I said, the programme was beautifully balanced. The
Op. 79 sonata consists of just three short movements.
Lasting only about ten minutes, it made for a delightful
aperitif on this occasion. The first movement, which is
the longest of the three, is an appealing Presto alla
tedesca. The music danced and rippled under Lewis’s
fingers. The following Andante is short and wistful and
sounds very close to Schubert. It was sensitively played
here and I admired particularly the beautiful weighting
of the chords at the very end. The finale is a gay rondo
of which Lewis gave a good-humoured reading.
Having launched the recital auspiciously Lewis then treated
us to a fine reading of the ‘Pastoral’ sonata.
He brought a wide range of tone to the first movement
and I admired very much the subtlety of his playing, which
was full of light and shade. The second movement is an
Andante, which was expertly controlled. It’s dominated
by a smooth chorale-like melody over a staccato bass and
there’s a central section that’s slightly
cheeky in nature and which I much enjoyed here. Lewis
was masterly in this movement. The teasing and percussive
scherzo was dispatched in a vivacious manner and then
the finale, a brilliant, bubbling rondo, was quite splendidly
done.
For all the delights of the first half we were in different
musical terrain after the interval. The ‘Hammerklavier’
is one of the Everests of the piano literature. In this
work Beethoven wrote for the solo piano on an unprecedented,
almost symphonic scale, extending hugely the boundaries
of required pianistic virtuosity. It remains one of the
supreme intellectual and physical challenges in the repertoire
and it’s significant that I believe Alfred Brendel,
a superb exponent of the work and Lewis’s erstwhile
teacher, stopped playing the sonata in public a few years
ago.
Lewis launched the huge opening allegro with epic sweep.
The vitality of his playing brought out the heroic grandeur
of this movement very well. He made the most of the many
percussive accents that play such an important role in
the music and while the climaxes were superbly delivered
the moments of repose were equally well observed. I was
especially struck by the tremendous energy that Lewis
brought to the development section.
Inevitably energy was also well to the
fore in the fiery scherzo. But this is but a brief movement
before the profundities of the Adagio sostenuto. Lewis
visibly composed himself for a short while before essaying
this profound meditation and he was surely right to do
so for the music now moves onto an entirely different,
far deeper plane and one of the many intellectual challenges
faced by the performer in this work is to adjust mentally
from the vigour and drive that have characterised so much
of the first two movements and to become contemplative
instead. Even more of a challenge is for the pianist to
make this adjustment of mindset with sufficient conviction
as to take his audience with him. Lewis achieved this
demanding transformation splendidly. Calmly and authoritatively
he probed this profound music throughout its duration
of some eighteen minutes. This was a tremendous feat of
concentration as well as of pianistic skill and perhaps
in this movement above all one realised why he has become
so very highly regarded. I thought that his patient control
and sustained concentration were mightily impressive.
Once again Lewis paused briefly before the finale, allowing
his audience to gather its thoughts, just as he clearly
needed to do. The first few minutes of the finale are
deceptively simple, not really hinting at the enormous
complexity of what is to come. Lewis conveyed the mainly
quiet tension of these pages very well before plunging
excitingly into the vast fugue. This music is not at all
easy for the listener to grasp, presenting an intellectual
challenge as great as anything in Bach’s keyboard
music, to which this is probably Beethoven’s great
tribute. This demanding movement could be described as
“Bach to the power of three” – or possibly
more than three. : Lewis played this movement powerfully,
though without any histrionics, but he managed to maintain
clarity of texture at all times – no mean feat.
The brief quiet episode towards the end of the movement
was a much-needed respite for everyone in the room. Then
Lewis rebuilt the volume and the tension and brought the
movement to a decisive conclusion. At the end I must confess
that your correspondent cast aside the critic’s
objectivity and joined several other members of the audience
in cheering this tremendous display of pianism.
This was an absolutely outstanding recital in every respect
and it thoroughly merited the warm ovation that it received.
Paul Lewis is clearly a musician of great perception and
one who is in complete sympathy with Beethoven’s
music. Though the programme called for – and received
– great technical virtuosity I was impressed with
– and greatly welcomed – the complete absence
of any platform histrionics. Paul Lewis simply came on
to the stage and gave unaffected, deeply musical and very
satisfying performances, which called for respect as well
as admiration.
Surely this was one of the highlights of the 2006 Cheltenham
Festival. I’ve heard a rumour that Paul Lewis will
be back at next year’s festival with another of
his Beethoven sonata programmes. If that happens my advice
would be to book early!
John Quinn