Editor: Marc Bridle

Regional Editor:Bill Kenny

 

Webmaster: Len Mullenger

 

 

                    

Google

WWW MusicWeb


Search Music Web with FreeFind




Any Review or Article


 

 

Seen and Heard International Recital Review

 

  

Ivan Moravec in New York: Janáček, Debussy, Chopin; Carnegie Hall, New York City, 31.10.2005 (BH)

 

 

Janáček: In the Mists
Debussy: Pour le piano
Chopin: Fantasy in F Minor/A-flat Major, Op. 49
Chopin: Nocturne in C-sharp Minor, Op. 27, No. 1
Chopin: Nocturne in D-flat Major, Op. 27, No. 2
Chopin: Nocturne in F-sharp Major, Op. 15, No. 2
Chopin: Nocturne in C Minor, Op. 48, No. 1
Chopin: Ballade in G Minor, Op. 23

Carnegie Hall, New York City,

Ivan Moravec, Piano

 

Much like good string quartet writing, music for solo piano has an intimacy that larger forms like orchestral works or opera simply do not have.  Last Monday night, New Yorkers had the opportunity to get very close to Ivan Moravec, who gave a recital notable for its haunting understatement.  Moravec, now 75, plays like a 35-year-old, and I mean that as high praise to both age groups.  Where some elder statesmen can be forgiven fingerwork or memory lapses, Moravec was pristine yet powerful, gentle yet politely roaring – an essay in refined pianism, in marked contrast to some recitals where sheer force seems to be the order of the day.  If Moravec probably won’t be heard in the work of Xenakis, Ferneyhough, Murail or Ligeti, it didn’t really matter during this unexpectedly graceful evening.

The Debussy was easily the hit of the evening.  The three short pieces that make up Pour le piano flowed from Moravec’s hands with an astonishing naturalness, with no undue emphasis on stretching the phrasing, no overly analytical references to anyone or anything else – just gently heroic playing, and that miraculous sense of effortlessness that the best artists cultivate.  Moravec uses a good bit of pedal – almost too much, according to one pianist friend – but for these pieces in Carnegie’s acoustic, it seemed just right: Debussy as the culmination of an era.  A different artist might play it more like the beginning of another.

If the Chopin seemed just slightly less gripping, it may have been (as another pianist pointed out) Moravec’s tendency to sometimes subvert expectations with his phrasing.  Soloists often “sing” in a way similar to the human voice, but here he seemed to be gently trying out a different way of playing these, especially the four Nocturnes.  The result was a certain distance, almost detached but not quite.  Nevertheless, certain qualities were in evidence throughout the program: elegantly framed phrases, a touch that seemed feather light when needed but plunged into stentorian fortissimo at a moment’s notice, and nothing overly fussy or twisted out of shape.  The last two, in F-sharp major and C minor, were particularly effective, and not the least of Moravec’s achievements was a highly distilled articulation at a very low volume level.  The Ballade, a favorite of Horowitz, maintained its strength but was notable in the more hushed moments.

The opening Janáček was tender and nicely handled, although after some exposure to this work by several other artists, I’m still not quite convinced that the work shows the composer at his finest.  In any case, Moravec employed the same precise, velvet handling, coupled with a soupçon of mystery that made me wish he had put some Bartók on the program.  The three encores were lovely: Chopin’s wispy Prelude in A Major seemingly over just as it began, a jaunty Polka in E-flat Major by Smetana, and in what many people thought the most mesmerizing of all, Debussy’s Serenade for the Doll from Children's Corner, delicately painted with immaculate control right through to the very end, when Moravec’s finger landed like a butterfly on the final celestial note.

 

 

Bruce Hodges

 

 

 

 

Back to the Top     Back to the Index Page


 





   

 

 

 
Error processing SSI file

 

Error processing SSI file