Seen and Heard International
Recital Review
Schumann, Debussy, Beethoven:
Ivan Moravec (piano), Perelman Theater, Kimmel Center, Philadelphia,
28 March 2005 (BJ)
Quite aside from the fact that we still have a couple of months
to go, to hail this recital as “the event of the season”
may seem like asking for trouble, in the sense of provoking disagreement
from concert-goers with other priorities on their preference list.
Yet I cannot think of a single presentation till now, whether
of chamber, instrumental, or orchestral music, that I would put
in the same league as Ivan Moravec’s recital for the Philadelphia
Chamber Music Society on 28 March.
The program was characteristically serious and characteristically
traditional: Schumann’s Kinderscenen, Estampes
and a group of five preludes by Debussy, and Beethoven’s
“Appassionata” Sonata. To succeed with music of that
stamp you have to have both a strong technique and a strong personality.
Moravec has both, and the astonishing thing is that he seems to
get better and better as he moves through his 70s. There is not
the slightest diminution in technical command, while the musical
insight, always keen, becomes ever more strikingly convincing.
The “Appassionata” on this occasion was a case in
point. Not only has Moravec restored the idiosyncratic repeat
in the finale that he omitted when he recorded the work decades
ago–that is mere detail. Much more important was the way
this performance combined all the familiar fire his readings have
generated over the years with the greatest rhythmic and textural
clarity; the first big outburst in the opening movement, for example,
arrived at its top note with total punctuality. The Andante con
moto, too, was an object lesson of inexorably graceful rhythmic
diversification culminating in an utterly natural reassertion
of the broader original pulse as the movement neared its end.
At this conclusion, the sudden fortissimo arpeggio that heralds
the finale demonstrated another Moravec trait: the ability to
make the piano ring with a brilliance and solidity rivaled by
very few pianists of this or, so far as I know, of any time. The
blend of sensitively nuanced timbre in soft music, superbly controlled
power in louder passages, and rocklike security in the bass at
all dynamic levels also informed and illuminated his revelatory
Schumann and Debussy before intermission. Typically, the Träumerei
movement in Kinderscenen was at once fluid and totally
lucid in pulse. The evocations of Asia in Debussy’s Pagodes,
of Spain in La soirée dans Grenade and La
puerta del vino, of Italian folk-dance in Les collines
d’Anacapri, and of all manner of mystery and myth in
La cathédrale engloutie and Ondine were limned
in with unfailing vividness of perception and richness of drama.
To assert that, since the death of Sviatoslav Richter, no pianist
has been able to rival Moravec’s sheer mastery of poetry
and technical security alike may, again, be dangerous. I assert
it nonetheless. I also found it fascinating that one good judge
I spoke to during intermission was struck before anything else
by the gentleness of Moravec’s playing, whereas for another
it was his strength that first claimed notice. And they were both
right.
Bernard Jacobson